ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs Sign Sean Smith (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271138)

Hammock Parties 03-16-2013 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9507265)
If he is so bad, why were so many teams interested in signing him?

Because teams are always going to be interested in a guy with top end talent.

ShortRoundChief 03-16-2013 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9507215)
I'll just have to take comfort in the fact that statistically, he was the worst CB in football two years in a row.


By the slanted numbers you provided. Numbers that exposed him to a higher rating because of his number of snaps. He's not even top 20 when average by snaps are compared.

The Bad Guy 03-16-2013 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9507297)
You've got it wrong.

He was ranked dead last in yards per route run in 2012.

In 2011 he had a good year and that's what you saw.

And I watched him in 2011 and there's was no ****ing way he was the 10th best corner in the league.

Hammock Parties 03-16-2013 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9507325)
And I watched him in 2011 and there's was no ****ing way he was the 10th best corner in the league.

He wasn't rated the 10th best CB in the league. LMAO

He was rated 84th overall.

He did have a decent coverage rating though, but had a terrible rating overall due to TDs allowed and leading the league in penalties...which is why I argued he sucked.

Hammock Parties 03-16-2013 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 9507324)
By the slanted numbers you provided. Numbers that exposed him to a higher rating because of his number of snaps. He's not even top 20 when average by snaps are compared.

Nothing slanted about being worst in the league in a major statistic.

And when you compare him per snap to the othe guys on that list...he's still the worst, because he played the same number of snaps as those other guys.

No legs to stand on, friend!

Mother****erJones 03-16-2013 09:08 PM

Clay, you didnt answer my question, wouldnt completion percentage be relevant in terms of TDs and the other stat you said because those are both completions?

Mother****erJones 03-16-2013 09:12 PM

That was harsh clay what you sent him as his avi pic

Hammock Parties 03-16-2013 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life (Post 9507363)
Clay, you didnt answer my question, wouldnt completion percentage be relevant in terms of TDs and the other stat you said because those are both completions?

I was gonna try to care but I just don't.

Mother****erJones 03-16-2013 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9507383)
I was gonna try to care but I just don't.

Nice backpedal. So his defensive completion percentage was good but he gave up a lot of TDs and yards. Might mean his safety help is dog shit. Like that gif against Donnie Avery

Hammock Parties 03-16-2013 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life (Post 9507393)
Nice backpedal. So his defensive completion percentage was good but he gave up a lot of TDs and yards. Might mean his safety help is dog shit. Like that gif against Donnie Avery

No, the Dolphins had good safety play.

PFF grades independent of other players, anyway.

The guy sucks, and has sucked, for two years.

Mother****erJones 03-16-2013 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9507394)
No, the Dolphins had good safety play.

PFF grades independent of other players, anyway.

The guy sucks, and has sucked, for two years.

Well ill reserve judgement til i see for myself. PFF isnt the end of the world

ShortRoundChief 03-16-2013 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9507349)
Nothing slanted about being worst in the league in a major statistic.

And when you compare him per snap to the othe guys on that list...he's still the worst, because he played the same number of snaps as those other guys.

No legs to stand on, friend!

http://i1324.photobucket.com/albums/...psf55a0839.gif

This is the leg I stand on. conveniently it is the graph directly under the one that asserts the 40 + 6 are the worst numbers. Notice you didn't post a link, mine is shown in the pic so everyone can see that you omitted certain facts that hurt your case.

Mother****erJones 03-16-2013 09:26 PM

Oh clay youre caught buddy!!

Hammock Parties 03-16-2013 09:29 PM

Who cares? By either statistic he is among the league's worst CBs.

He's going to play a lot of snaps here and give up a lot of first downs again.

Can't wait!

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-16-2013 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9507428)
Who cares? By either statistic he is among the league's worst CBs.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/transactions/free-agents


But yet on must free agent list he's in the top 20. Man this guy sure sucks.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.