![]() |
They were on Sunday night baseball and they were saying that was a change up he threw to Donaldson and all of the analysts were saying he didn't do it on purpose especially with a change up
|
Quote:
Some of the crap that happened earlier in the season was pretty embarrassing, IMO. Especially Ventura and Herrera's antics. |
Quote:
A changup looks like a fastball and when it's up and in, you spin the hell out. he didn't see that ball get caught and he damn sure didn't know it was a changeup when he reacted. MLB Network spoke directly to Cain and Volquez looking to incite, however, and made it a special note of the fact that the Royals dugout emptied immediately when Escobar got hit as though they were looking for another confrontation. That was when the Jays responded in kind. There was no need for the benches to empty at all. If you think it was okay for Volquez to hit Donaldson in the first after Moustakas got hit yesterday (arguable, but not an unfair statement), then after Tulo gets hit, the opposing SS getting hit in the legs should not have emptied the benches. The Royals, again, caused shit that didn't need to happen by ignoring a calculus that THEY established in the first inning. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://m.mlb.com/video/v324498183/kc...game_pk=415218 So your claim the the dugout "emptied immediately" is more BS from you. |
Quote:
No, a changeup coming out of a pitchers hand and traveling near the hitters head is going to look like a fastball in the 1/100th of a second they have to diagnose it and decide. Combine the general nature of a changeup with the fight/flight mechanism associated with a fastball coming at your head and there is no way Donaldson knew that was a changeup when he spun out. Tulo didn't get hit on purpose Sunday but Moose wasn't hit on purpose Saturday (unless we're back to the "all Royals HBPs are on purpose" thing). If Moose getting hit on accident on Saturday is ample justification for Donaldson getting hit on Sunday, then please tell me why Tulo getting hit on accident on Sunday is not ample justification for Escobar getting hit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Kind of like a lot of the Royals problems. They don't start it but overreact and look like the assholes. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Mewling: Welsh valleys slang. To drive around in a car (usually a clapped-out Escort/Nova covered in cheap spoilers and Max Power stickers) with your mates, wearing baseball hats, listening to an incredibly loud stereo, in an attempt to impress and then impregnate the local 14 year olds. 'Jon's gone mewling in his Nova. I saw him doing doughnuts in the Iceland carpark. The local chavettes seemed very impressed.' |
I'm not saying Moose was hit on purpose maybe the Royals did and that why they hot Donaldson but that's that and warnings were drawn and that should of been the end of it. Batters know the difference between change ups and fastballs and the MPH on pitches.
|
Quote:
Seriously, you're going to look at that video from the 2:10 mark and claim it vindicates you? Shit, you really are removed from reality at this point, aren't you? |
I don't know if it's been posted or if you guys give a shit, but Aaron Sanchez got a 3 game suspension for that incident against the Royals.
3 games is ****ing bs. Sanchez is gonna appeal. I think he should because that's a bit harsh. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Jays are NOT allowed to hit Escobar after Tulo gets hit on accident. Got it. Of COURSE it was blatant - that's not the point. Neither side is even arguing that the pitches weren't clear purpose pitches. My question is why you believe the Royals purpose pitch was acceptable and the Jays pitch wasn't? The warning didn't settle things nor should it have by the Royals very own calculus. Once their SS got hit on accident after the warning, the Royals SS became fair game, just as their 3b was fair game when Moose got hit. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.