![]() |
Best case scenario for Tyreek is that he’s not charged and he is punished for what he says on the tape.
Someone clearly believes he did it — but the police and CPS would have asked his son if he said Tyreek did it and one presumes they were left with enough doubt to not charge. What’s bizarre is if his fiancé just wanted him to fry she’d testify against him, support what her son was saying (though the tape makes it pretty clear that she wasn’t a direct witness to anything), and testify against him. And if she’s not out to fry him (or, put another way, if she’s out to protect him), why make this tape in the first place as “insurance” and then give it to someone else who could then release it whether you want it released or not? If you’re the party that wants Tyreek to go down (justifies or not), why are you holding on to something waiting for him to be charged rather than just letting the police have it? None of these motivations make any sense, they conflict with one another, and all the games on the part of the anti-Tyreek participants in this event seem so unnecessary. Tyreek is going to pay for what he said on the tape regardless of any other outcomes but the whole thing is just bizarre and even those who claim to have the child’s best interest at heart (where the focus really should be) seem to be avoiding actions that would lead in the straightest line to some sort of help for the kid. |
Quote:
|
OMG!!! Look at this Florio
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Kareem Hunt has "exceeded expectations" in Cleveland <a href="https://t.co/hnvfBh3pln">https://t.co/hnvfBh3pln</a></p>— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) <a href="https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/1122579604294787072?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 28, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
He called him a "punk ass coward" and that he would like to punch him in the chest, not that he would "punk him." |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Chiefs, NFL likely to take action on Tyreek Hill this week <a href="https://t.co/bprEkPoKej">https://t.co/bprEkPoKej</a></p>— Busch League (@BuschLeagueNY) <a href="https://twitter.com/BuschLeagueNY/status/1122581100168192000?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 28, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Quote:
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ill-this-week/ I guess he got around to reading the comments of the readers who were pointing out what a fool he looked like... |
I know a ton of people are willing to look the other way just because this guy can score TDs, but imagine of this was your kid being beaten or your daughter. This dude has no respect for anybody, much less his fiance or kid. You have to draw the line somewhere, because if this happened on any other team all of you would be saying suspend him a year. I know everybody is hoping this gets pushed under the rug, but this all started back up when they decided not to press charges and people are concerned for their safety. Yea I know he's innocent u til proven guilty but that until is soon. Tyreek has played his last down as a Chief.
|
Quote:
This isn’t really the NFL or the Chiefs decision. Let’s leave it to the professionals. If he is charged with a crime, put him in jail. If not, keep him. Cleveland Browns do not deserve his services. They WILL take him. No one could ever stop Hill, OBJ, Landry, Njoku, Chubb, Hunt, with a competent QB like Baker Cutting Hill today won’t make his family safe, it won’t help anything except rival teams |
Quote:
Should already be banned |
Quote:
|
He good!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
My guess is the league bans him for this year and the Chiefs put him on the list. Retain his rights for next season.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.