ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Call Your Shot: Who’s the Chiefs first selection in the 2020 Draft (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=330630)

duncan_idaho 04-22-2020 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14922587)
It's because they're afraid of being ridiculed on TV especially if the guy they moved for ends up sucking.

Oh, totally. NFL is a copycat, groupthink league.

It's cool whenever you have a leadership group that can take advantage of it and "moneyball" the rest of the people.

DJ's left nut 04-22-2020 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14922702)
The only time I ever saw a good passer was when Oklahoma schemed him some dudes open by 10 yards.....on the NFL level he's not gonna pass well at all.

And I don't think his anticipation is very good either. That's always masked when you have guys running wide open, but he seems just a tick slow on his delivery and when you don't have the arm strength to power it into a window as it closes, being a tick late is an interception waiting to happen.

I don't actually think he's inaccurate - seems to throw where he wants to far more often than he doesn't. I just think he's limited enough in his anticipation and arm strength that any sort of lapses in accuracy will have inordinately bad outcomes.

But here's the thing - he's a better thrower than Lamar Jackson. And while he's not as good a runner as Lamar (not as naturally elusive), he's pretty damn close. Can you build around that?

Hard to say. I'm just glad I don't have to talk myself into guys like this anymore because in years past, I'd have spent a month convincing myself that he's the perfect mix of Jackson and Alex and if you give him a quality OL and running game, he can win you a Super Bowl.

Man those days sucked.

Coogs 04-22-2020 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 14922555)
I was re-watching the 2017 draft last night on ESPN and a couple things stood out - 1) how stupid the 49ers, Jags and Bengals were. The talking heads kept alluding to the fact that those squads needed quarterbacks and all 3 of them went a different direction. Hard to believe it was only 2 years ago but I just cannot see teams as quarterback needy as those squads were passing on a QB of any stripe these days. I guess we'll see w/ what Miami does.

But what I found most interesting was watching Arizona around pick 11. EVERYONE knew Arizona was taking Watson if he fell to 13. But at 12, the Browns clearly didn't care much about the available guys on the board and hadn't talked themselves into Watson. So what they wanted wasn't to move down 1 spot for a 3rd round pick - they wanted that future 1st from someone.

Well Arizona couldn't justify giving up a future 1st rounder to move up a single spot, right? And a future 1st round was what Cleveland was going to want to move out of that spot, even if it meant moving further down in the 1st. So a team like Houston was actually in an easier spot in some ways. Because if Cleveland takes a 3rd to move down to 13 from 12, they realize Watson is gone at that point and their ability to get that extra 1st rounder vanishes because nobody's gonna go ham to move up to 13 and grab Allen or whoever else was left.

In some ways, a big move is easier to make. Walk it all the way back to the 10 spot and assume Buffalo hadn't already reached an agreement in principal with Dorsey. The Cardinals still aren't going to give up an additional 1st to move up from 13 to 10 but both KC and Houston are right in the sweet spot to push themselves into that range and the return for a rebuilding Buffalo/Cleveland squad is going to be strong enough w/ that future 1st that they'll be eager to take it.

It's something you're able to recognize more in hindsight because you know how things worked out. You can actually sit there and say "man...why didn't Arizona move up to get their guy?" and you realize that in some ways, their hands were tied. Oh sure, they could've given up a future 1st and 13 to move up to 10...but that's a ridiculous expectation given what we knew at the time.

A lot of things had to go exactly right for the Mahomes thing to happen (or Watson to Houston), including the fact that both KC and Houston were good enough those seasons that their 2017 1st rounder was far enough back to justify them giving up the 1st in the following year that Buffalo and Cleveland wanted as part of any trade-down scenario.

I'd have to throw the Browns in there with those 3 teams as actually needing a QB, and they passed on Mahomes and Watson. Mahomes once, and Watson twice. Sure, they have a top DE from the #1 spot. But seriously... Mahomes, or Watson for that matter... over a DE and eventually Baker. Browns are gonna Brown.

DaneMcCloud 04-22-2020 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic (Post 14922603)
Buffalo should have taken the Texans offer.

Sean McDermott owes his career to Andy Reid, as do so many others in the Bills organization.

There's no way they'd choose another offer over their mentor and friend.

Kiimo 04-22-2020 11:03 AM

Here's the DB from Bob McGinn. It doesn't sound great for Delpit.


Spoiler!

duncan_idaho 04-22-2020 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 14922816)
Here's the DB from Bill. It doesn't sound great for Delpit.


Reggie Robinson, though...

Re: Delpit, I did see that he didn't miss a tackle in any of their last 3 games - SEC Title vs. UGA, and the two playoff games.

That's a pretty high level of competition. Lends some credence to the idea his tackling problems were due to an injury and the tackler he was in 2018 and at the end of 2019 is who he really is.

The Franchise 04-22-2020 11:07 AM

Nate Taylor drafted Reggie Robinson in his latest mock draft.

The Franchise 04-22-2020 11:09 AM

His full mock draft is:

1. Kenneth Murray, LB, Oklahoma
2. Chase Claypool, WR, Notre Dame
3. Ben Bartch, OT, St. John’s
4. Reggie Robinson, CB, Tulsa
5. Khalil Davis, DT, Nebraska

duncan_idaho 04-22-2020 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 14922831)
His full mock draft is:

1. Kenneth Murray, LB, Oklahoma
2. Chase Claypool, WR, Notre Dame
3. Ben Bartch, OT, St. John’s
4. Reggie Robinson, CB, Tulsa
5. Khalil Davis, DT, Nebraska

I like it but would prefer a different offensive playmaker at 63 than Claypool. TE conversions are always iffy...

Love Bartch and Robinson (who i admittedly hadn't heard much about until the write-up today on The Athletic).

I'd like Bartch more if he was one of two options taken on the OL, since he's more of a developmental pick.

If they could pull a trade down to grab an extra 4th so you take a G as well as Bartch, that seems ideal...

Mecca 04-22-2020 11:14 AM

Swap out Claypool with the best RB there...

Kiimo 04-22-2020 11:15 AM

Also I forgot who was high on Dantzler but he doesn't sound great either.


12. CAMERON DANTZLER, Mississippi State (6-2, 188, 4.60, 3): Dantzler is the tallest and slowest prospect among the top 25 corners. “I liked him a lot but he ran terrible,” one scout said. “On tape, really good instincts, short-area quickness, loose athlete, ball skills. Competes for the ball. Good in run support.” A fourth-year junior, Dantzler redshirted in 2016 before starting 22 of 35 games. “Top of the second round before he ran,” another scout said. “He’s gone from there. Probably middle of the third day now. Although wasn’t Richard Sherman a fifth-rounder? With his height, you don’t have to run as fast as some of the others. You still have coverage.” Two other problems: short arms (30 5/8) and 11.4% body fat, the highest among the top 12 corners. He was removed from one team’s draft board because of makeup concerns. “He’s a good player,” said a third scout. “My biggest problem with him is his body type. He’s really skinny so he’ll have durability issues. I’m worried about the body more than anything.” Dantzler is from Hammond, La.



Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 14922831)
His full mock draft is:

1. Kenneth Murray, LB, Oklahoma
2. Chase Claypool, WR, Notre Dame
3. Ben Bartch, OT, St. John’s
4. Reggie Robinson, CB, Tulsa
5. Khalil Davis, DT, Nebraska


I could crush cans with my penis if this happened

chiefzilla1501 04-22-2020 11:23 AM

It would not surprise me if a lot of mock drafts are putting CBs way too far down the draft boards. This league is full of unimaginative patriots copycats. Id imagine there will be a run on man press corners even though the strength of the draft is OT and WR.

Mecca 04-22-2020 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 14922844)
Also I forgot who was high on Dantzler but he doesn't sound great either.


12. CAMERON DANTZLER, Mississippi State (6-2, 188, 4.60, 3): Dantzler is the tallest and slowest prospect among the top 25 corners. “I liked him a lot but he ran terrible,” one scout said. “On tape, really good instincts, short-area quickness, loose athlete, ball skills. Competes for the ball. Good in run support.” A fourth-year junior, Dantzler redshirted in 2016 before starting 22 of 35 games. “Top of the second round before he ran,” another scout said. “He’s gone from there. Probably middle of the third day now. Although wasn’t Richard Sherman a fifth-rounder? With his height, you don’t have to run as fast as some of the others. You still have coverage.” Two other problems: short arms (30 5/8) and 11.4% body fat, the highest among the top 12 corners. He was removed from one team’s draft board because of makeup concerns. “He’s a good player,” said a third scout. “My biggest problem with him is his body type. He’s really skinny so he’ll have durability issues. I’m worried about the body more than anything.” Dantzler is from Hammond, La.






I could crush cans with my penis if this happened

Dantzlers combine 40 was awful, his supposed proday one was better. I don't buy he's that slow though because he ran with the Bama guys, he actually has far and away the best tape of any CB against Bama and LSU this year, if you buy into tape he's good.

Mecca 04-22-2020 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 14922862)
It would not surprise me if a lot of mock drafts are putting CBs way too far down the draft boards. This league is full of unimaginative patriots copycats. Id imagine there will be a run on man press corners even though the strength of the draft is OT and WR.

Half of the first round is going to be OT's and CB's, CB's always get drafted high.

DrRyan 04-22-2020 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 14922838)
I like it but would prefer a different offensive playmaker at 63 than Claypool. TE conversions are always iffy...

Love Bartch and Robinson (who i admittedly hadn't heard much about until the write-up today on The Athletic).

I'd like Bartch more if he was one of two options taken on the OL, since he's more of a developmental pick.

If they could pull a trade down to grab an extra 4th so you take a G as well as Bartch, that seems ideal...

I agree completely. RB at 63 if there is comparable or likely better value there would be ideal. I have come around a bit on RB earlier, still preferably not at 32 though. I think Cam Akers at 63 or Zack Moss in the third would be most ideal all things considered if they are available. I expect Moss will be there at 96.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.