Originally Posted by TEX (Post 14037401)

:facepalm: True. But are you really going there? Its not the same at all...We lost 2 games without him out of 14. We lost 2 with him out of 2 games played. Get it?

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 14036694)

Can we somehow get over Berry?

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger (Post 14037418)

BUT HE WAS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THOSE DEFEATS!!!..how the hell anyone can blame him for the Chargers loss WHEN WE WERE WINNING WHEN HE WAS ON THE FIELD is beyond me, it's a pathetic excuse really :rolleyes: .

Originally Posted by Meatloaf (Post 14036927)

Goodness, there's certainly a lot of frustration (bordering on hate) for Berry these days. I'm as frustrated as anyone that Berry hasn't been playing, but c'mon guys, you know as well as I do that this guy is a warrior. There is not one shred of QUIT in this guy as he had EVERY opportunity to do so when battling cancer, rehabbing from the Achilles tear, etc. And when he's been on the field this year, he sure looks to me like he's giving it his all.

Yeah, he makes a gazillion dollars and yeah the Chiefs did him no favors with that stupid day-to-day bullshit, but do you REALLY think this guy is faking it? Seriously? I think his teammates would be the first to know, yet it sure seems as if they still pay a ton of attention to what he says/does on the sideline. Do you really think they'd put up with fake bullshit? I know these guys aren't the second coming of Einstein, but give 'em a smidgen of credit for knowing/recognizing leadership when they see it. And trust me, you know as well as I that we'd be able to tell if his teammates felt Berry's behavior was just so much schtick.

Gentlemen, I fear this is simply another case where it frustrates us to no end when (argueably) our best defensive player isn't playing. Plus, knowing that he's making more $$$ than all of us (probably combined) adds to the frustration.

Hey, we are hosting the stinking AFC Championship game here at Arrowhead! Why get hung up on a situation that we really know very little about. Let's send as many positive vibes as we can muster to One Arrowhead Drive as we make our way to a World Championship!!!!

Go Chiefs!!!

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 14037401)

:facepalm:

True. But are you really going there??? It's not the same sample size at all...We lost 2 games without him out of 14. We lost 2 with him out of 2 games played. Get it?

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 14037464)

No, because if you want to use the sample size excuse then the sample size is too small.

It's a stupid argument.

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 14037434)

No dude, what's pathetic is you have been constantly washing his balls, and suggesting racial reasoning behind anyone who doesn't do the same thing. That's ****ing pathetic.

Did he play against the Chargers? Yes
Did he play against the Seahawks? Yes
Did KC lose both games. Yes

Damn, don't ya just hate it when facts get in the way...

Originally Posted by Basileus777 (Post 14037354)

Gronk is a blocking tight end at this point in his career. He's really good at that, but covering him is like bottom of the barrel stuff to worry about.

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 14037522)

No.

Hell no.

And he shouldn't even be allowed. This defense climbed one hell of a "Hamburger Hill" without his ass OR his "cheer leading". If he wants to go to Atlanta after this game, he can do so on his own ****ing dime( of which he has many ), and watch the game at his parents house.

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 14037527)

Guess you missed our last game agaist the Patriots then. When they needed one catch, it was Gronk they went to with the game on the line. And he delivered.

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 14037522)

No.

Hell no.

And he shouldn't even be allowed. This defense climbed one hell of a "Hamburger Hill" without his ass OR his "cheer leading". If he wants to go to Atlanta after this game, he can do so on his own ****ing dime( of which he has many ), and watch the game at his parents house.

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 14037477)

No, it's not a stupid argument, but you're being stupid if you don't want to understand it. LMAO

Originally Posted by Basileus777 (Post 14037354)

Gronk is a blocking tight end at this point in his career. He's really good at that, but covering him is like bottom of the barrel stuff to worry about.