As I said it's going to cost us, the Chiefs will have to live with difficult decisions if they want trade into the 1st

How is trading the pick we got from Marcus Peters “robbing from next year?”

There’s absolutely no chance they trade Hill.

It’s silly to even suggest.

3 is overkill, 2 is fine with one penciled in package starter IMO

Its true, this isnt just another CP dumbass 'lets draft a fatty yay O line' drumbeat... everyone from you and me, to national writers knows that LG has been a black hole for freaking years

If there is a chance to lock that spot down for 10 years as one of St Pats 'Unsullied' bodyguards, you take it... Veach has already proven that he intends to load this offense, so dont be surprised about LG

I feel like a nice guy this evening, no insults forthcoming... but there should be

What's your solution?

Using a combination of the pick from Peters and either this years 2 or 3.

Either combination would get us into the late first early second.

Yep.

While Mahomes will possibly make the OL look better than Alex did, no way anyone can deny they've never figured out the LG position and Witz is not the answer at all.

I don't think they gotta shift up in the draft to fill it, but hard to fill that need if they trade off half of the picks and spend it all on corners.

Moving up a but to land a starting corner and nabbing a 2nd one somewhere Day 3 is definitely realistic.

When they are trading off a future choice to fall back under the standard pick count threshold, what else would you call it?

Losing the actual net gain from the Peters trade to move up for his replacement would net them a 6th for 4th swap for an All-pro corner.

That would be like pissing on an electric fence because Frank said you were a pussy and wouldn't do it. You did it and by golly did it hurt, so your solution for burning dick is to numb it up some by sticking it in the waffle iron. Sure it goes numb and the pain subsides and Frank thinks you're cool as ****, but now your dick looks like a mangled burnt breadstick.

you know Dan well the Chiefs will have to over pay especially if it's out in the open.

This won't be a friendly deal on KC's end

If KC is giving up the kind of capital it takes to get to 33-37, they'll likely do what it takes to get to 32 or above. That 5th year option is too valuable.

Teams always overpay to move up. But to suggest that he's contemplating trading Tyreek is ridiculous. It's the man's first draft year, I'm sure he wants to stick around for a few more years. Trading Tyreek guarantees he's one and done.

Not only that, this is exactly how shills like Athan get absurd story lines published. I wouldn't be surprised if he writes about how he's "hearing rumors Veach wants to trade Tyreek, per an unnamed source".

Trade next years second or third, trade Clarks mom... trade anything but your proven All-Pro gamebreaker on his rookie contract for cripe pete!!!!!!

Some aren't living in the real world concerning that making a very public trade will be expensive.

I'm shelling out nightmare scenarios, but people are acting like 3 year olds not understanding that the other team is out to **** us over too.

the trade chart is BS, when other teams are inflating the price because of a bidding war for player(s)

You do realize Philly doesn’t have a 2nd or 3rd round picks?

You do realize that doesn't matter, they just won the SB as it stands