![]() |
with Jake Plummer & Kerry Collins for four games there would be no INT bonus in Law's contract
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Giving him top dollar only to have him injured and not playing is throwing money away. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
How about making the Pro Bowl?
|
Quote:
just no Hicks :( |
Quote:
If he's all he says he is then you would think he believes he'd have an impact on the defense as a whole. Maybe we could tie some of the incentives to the overall performance of the secondary or the overall performance of the defense. Any significant improvement on defense would have to consist of improved play by both our corners. Pay him big if our pass defense improves big. After all that's what we're after. He'd get what he wants and we'd get what we need. If the incentives were to be based on individual stats, maybe it would make sense to base it on a statistical improvement of his position compared to last year. Fewer completions, fewer yards, fewer first downs, fewer TD's, etc. Maybe the size of the bonus could be tied directly to the percentage decrease of those negative stats. |
Quote:
If you don't like the fortune he's already spent this offseason, become a ****ing hockey fan. |
Quote:
As far as the second part, I do think he is worth the money. Especially if the bonus can be structured to be on next years. We shouldn't need as many FA's then. Just a shift in power from the offense to the defense. |
I watched the story on sportcenter last night. It showed Law training. I know it's not pads, but he was working hard. Planting, cutting, running up and down stairs. To me that foot looks like it is doing fine. Someone will pay good jack for him. I'd wouldn't mind taking the gamble from what I saw of him.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.