I'm guessing your the resident asshole around here? You could have respectively disagreed and gave reasons why. But I guess there's always got to be one on every board. I'm not the one who makes up lies to back up their points, so you should be the last person throwing the "reeruned" word around.

It's been discussed 852 times I lose my patience after the 100th time.

I haven't read through this, but is someone talking about using a first round pick(top three for that matter) on a RT again?

ROFL

:doh!:

Let me get this straight, a RT is worth a top three pick but a RE(one of the most important positions on a defense) isn't?

Look I understand at times positional value can be overrated but if the guy was a OT worth a top 5 pick guess what...he's a LT.

If you don't like the DE's please pick another position, you'd be better off with Taylor Mays than taking a RT.

Honestly if we drafted a OT in the top three I would play him at LT even if we drafted Albert the first. If Albert can't play RG then move him back to LG like he played in college. I'm sure Waters could handle RG or even C. If waters played C then we could try Niswanger out at RG for a year.

Well I just joined, obviously wasn't here for that. I stated an opinion, and maybe it was off-base, I don't know everything. I come to places like these to hear different viewpoints and learn. A quick answer wouldn't kill ya, or just ignore me.

It's fine.....if you really think it's a good idea you can explain it out, I just don't think it would be a good idea, unless of course your QB was left handed.

Albert has done a very good job there's no reason to burn another really high pick on another LT, unless you are going to hire a coach who thinks running 5 WR's out into the pattern every play and going minimum protection is how you play offense so you need a dominant lineman and 2 outstanding OT's.

A-****ingMen.

Taking the best player, even at RT isn't such a bad idea.

Some of the top teams and up and coming teams in the AFC (Pitt, NE, Balt, Miami, Chargers) play out of a 3-4. They bring pressure from their OLB's on both sides of the line.

Other top 4-3 teams now have good rushers on both ends (Tennesse and Indy). Since the NFL is a copy cat league more teams will try to follow the NYG example and put good pass rushers on both sides of the ball.

It isn't really a case of "just stop Jared Allen on right side" and we don't have to worry too much about the left.

IF a franchise QB or DE isn't available and the next highest rated player is a RT, it isn't such a bad idea.

Except if you go that route the RT would be a much better LT prospect than our current LT, and I'm not saying Albert is bad at all.

Smith will be the first OT off the board and would play LT. Albert would be moved to RT or Guard. You would have one of the best tackle tandems in football for the next 12 years. Other then QB, I think this would be the way to go if you draft on the offensive side of the ball.

Our next number goes out to all those wacky Big 12 QB and Tebow-drafting ****tards...
And-a 1, 2, 3, 4:

You can go to school,
So you don't look the fool,
Go Now!
(note Manning-esque Happy Feet, and keep those eyes on 1:14)

<object width="425" height="344">


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vgJrv8_z33M&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object>

Better resolution, eyes at 2:20. USC lost this game due to a pick six on Mark's part, but what we're concerned about here is technique, form, accuracy, mobility, and rocket-arm.
Resume Class:

<object width="425" height="344">


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fghkCpEHHpg&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object>

Thigpen has proved that the Chiefs offense can score points. What they need in the draft and free agency more than anything are stud defensive players - linebackers and forces on the D-line. Other than Sam Bradford, I don't see anyone I'd go with in the first round at this point.

I would not move Albert under any circumstances at all. I mean, goddamn, he literally dominated Joey Porter. It seemed like Porter never showed up.

And honestly, I can remember at least 3 sacks that he may have given up during his time here (There could be more, but I'm just basing it off of my head). That's pretty damn impressive for a rookie. And on top of that, he did miss all or at least the majority of training camp.

So, that being said, I would not move Albert under any circumstances at all.