The annals of football history are littered with elite teams led by a cover backer.

Would you take Mike Singletary (19 sacks for his career)?

How about Ray Lewis (33.5 sacks... but over 13 seasons)?

Great example - guys not taken within the first 25 picks.

You're a ****ing moron. Seriously. You're a ****ing MORON.

They didn't draft a LB in the top 5. They didn't draft a LB in the 10. They didn't draft a LB in the top 15. They let Joey Porter walk (who's pissed off by the way that he didn't stay in Pittsburgh). Harrison is undrafted, Farrior was an UFRA and Woodley was a late 2nd rounder. If ANYTHING, this says "Don't spend the number 3 overall pick on a linebacker".

JFC.

Oh, there's a few other reasons why they won the Super Bowl in 2005 and 2008: Ben Rothlisberger and Troy Palumalu.

Without EITHER of those guys, they'd be just another football team.

Just like Tom Brady and Kurt Warner and ... - let's not go there, okay?

The point isn't to find diamonds in the rough, it's who's the most likely diamond at #3. I just listed two LBs who were huge impact players even though they weren't pass-rushers.

If Curry projects out to potentially that kind of player on Piolli's board, why should he not take him?

This is such a ****ing stupid argument.

Your wife beats you, doesn't she? So much anger over nothing...

Well Orange is a Bronco fan so of course he wants us to pick Curry he can then laugh at us for overdrafting a overhyped LB after his team did the samething with DJ Williams and hasn't gotten nearly the production for his selection spot.

Yes, you found me out! I post messages on ChiefsPlanet because I know Pioli will read them and be influenced!!

Damn, you're good.

LOL, you don't have any interest in the Chiefs being good so cmon now.

No shit its like us dogging Cutler when we all would give our left nut to have him.

Strangely enough, I do. They've been my #2 team from back in AFL days.

But let's say you're right and I wish them ill...

Your scenario still doesn't make any sense. Wouldn't I prefer them to draft Sanchez - which I've said would be a mistake - then have him suck so I can laugh at you guys and say "I told you so" for the next three years?

As it is, if the Chiefs draft Curry, I have to hope he works out so I don't have egg on my face.

Ok let me ask you this question..

Why would you draft Curry 3 when that pick would mean you'd have to pay him more than you could get Dansby for in FA, hell if you take Curry 3 you might be able to get Dansby and Leroy Hill cheaper combined.

First, I'm not that high on Curry personally, but he IS the one guy everyone says is a can't miss prospect in this draft, so like I said above a couple pages, it wouldn't surprise me to see the Chiefs draft him.

Second, I don't think Dansby gets past the Broncos.

[edit] to save you having to dig back, I think the Chiefs will (and should*) take a DL.

*unless Stafford is there, but I don't see any way that happens.

Oh, I'm sorry. Weren't you the dumbass touting the Steelers lack of defensive backs, specifically cornerbacks as to a primary reason why a team has to value a cornerback in the top three? Because they have won a Super Bowl two of the past four years? And they have a good quarterback? And that they have drafted good linebackers? And that their cornerback position has been de-valued because of said good linebackers?

Dumbass.

Seriously.

Read what you wrote.

I know it's Valentines, and you are sitting at home, alone, but there is no reason for you to get all pissy about stupid shit you have already penned.