ChiefsPlanet
Page 8 of 9 « First 4567 8 9
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Aghast Over Pendergast? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=204460)

Halfcan 03-20-2009 04:23 PM
:clap:
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5594967)
That's a pathetic excuse for an article, even though the questions raised are legitimate.
yep

Hammock Parties 03-20-2009 04:26 PM
HEY LET'S BASH GOCHIEFS! HIGH FIVE EVERYONE!

SAUTO 03-20-2009 05:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5597153)
There's not NEARLY the amount of talent on that Cardinals defense that you contend there is. They're light years ahead of the Chiefs, for sure, but they're not even close to Top 10 in terms of talent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5598077)
How much of that was the coordinator? How much of it was something else? There's so many variables to include that bitching about Pendergast at this point just doesn't make much sense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5598102)
How much of it was the head coach? Who were the position coaches?

Again, the primary reason you're going to look at the DC is because YOU WANT TO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5598150)
I know, I know.

I always tend to wait for people to prove they can't win before I label them as such.

It's a character flaw. :)
i'm glad someone feels the way i do about this, funny how when you say just about the same thing as me they choose not to call names.

keg in kc 03-20-2009 05:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5598368)
i'm glad someone feels the way i do about this, funny how when you say just about the same thing as me they choose not to call names.
We've tagged poor porker with every name in the book for years. Err, parker. I mean parker. *cough*

SenselessChiefsFan 03-20-2009 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 5598046)
Actually that's what LJ said about the Offensive play calling during the Herm Edwards era, but whatever.
Perhaps, but I believe Eric Hicks was the one who used the term first in 2004 when Gunther came back. I know it was said in 2004 when Gunther came back.

htismaqe 03-20-2009 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5598368)
i'm glad someone feels the way i do about this, funny how when you say just about the same thing as me they choose not to call names.
I was on Carl Peterson's payroll for almost 6 years, so I can handle it.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-20-2009 07:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5598526)
I was on Carl Peterson's payroll for almost 6 years, so I can handle it.
Really?

SAUTO 03-20-2009 08:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5598526)
I was on Carl Peterson's payroll for almost 6 years, so I can handle it.
oh i can handle it too, it's just funny how some bash people's opinions yet when someone with more posts says the same thing they dont get NEAR as belligerent

Red Dawg 03-20-2009 08:35 PM
Pioli has three rings. Dv had one. I think that this a stupid comparoson.

jAZ 03-23-2009 07:49 AM
I think it's a lot more justifiable to question Haley's hiring judgement than Pioli player evaluation judgement.

jAZ 03-23-2009 07:50 AM
That said, I think anyone who doesn't take a wait and see approach to all of it, it's either an emotionally abused fan or getting payed to stir up shit.

htismaqe 03-23-2009 08:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5598528)
Really?
It was a long-standing joke here, and on the Star BB before that.

I'm not a guy that will go full-blown negative without a reason (see Herm :cuss:) and I usually can't keep my mouth shut in the face of hyperbole and outright lies.

So anytime I wasn't willing to join the "fire Carl Peterson" circle jerk, I got accused of being an Apologist. That morphed into being "on the payroll" and myself and many others played it up for fun.

htismaqe 03-23-2009 08:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 5603374)
That said, I think anyone who doesn't take a wait and see approach to all of it, it's either an emotionally abused fan or getting payed to stir up shit.
This.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-23-2009 08:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5603438)
It was a long-standing joke here, and on the Star BB before that.

I'm not a guy that will go full-blown negative without a reason (see Herm :cuss:) and I usually can't keep my mouth shut in the face of hyperbole and outright lies.

So anytime I wasn't willing to join the "fire Carl Peterson" circle jerk, I got accused of being an Apologist. That morphed into being "on the payroll" and myself and many others played it up for fun.
Well, if Pioli fails, at least you've got THAT payroll to look forward to. :D

htismaqe 03-23-2009 09:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5603453)
Well, if Pioli fails, at least you've got THAT payroll to look forward to. :D
There's no room for patience or diligence on a board like this. Every discussion has to be highly-polarized - you're either violently for or violently against. Don't even try to occupy the middle ground... :D


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:17 PM.
Page 8 of 9 « First 4567 8 9
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.