![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
No. But if you think that Matt Cassel is anything but... |
Quote:
A franchise QB doesn't have to be a "chuck it all around" player. Big Ben is a franchise calibur QB -- they Steelers don't win without that last TD on a pass so pornographically perfect that it dumbfounded me. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1999: 4 2000: 1 2001: 6 2002: 1 2003: 1 2004: 2 2005: 3 2006: 23 2007: 17 2008: 1 Only 2 of the defenses weren't top 6. |
Quote:
QB's still provide the most impact, imo. |
Quote:
I don't want Cassel, but that would be a funny situation. |
Quote:
Therefore: -Mark Sanchez PLUS guy they would have taken with 2nd round pick must be compared to: -Tyson Jackson PLUS Matt Cassel People forget that passing on Mark Sanchez gave us the opportunity to draft Tyson Jackson. If we don't trade for Cassel, we don't get Jackson. |
Quote:
The problem with arguments made by people arguing in the same vein Dane and yourself is that they are really not arguments based in logic as much as they are arguments by people pissed off that the team didn't draft Sanchez. Just for one example, you're sitting here harping on this "better chance with a top pick", but you rebel against the statistics about the number of starts a QB has before getting to the NFL. The reality is that, if you go by the "first round" stuff and other relevant numbers, you'd have wanted to avoid Sanchez at all costs. |
Quote:
I can live with that. |
Quote:
I'd take Mark Sanchez and Max Unger over the duo of Jackson and Cassel any day of the week. |
Quote:
The fact is, Cassel has the potential to be EXACTLY what you're wanting, you just won't give him a chance. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.