| chiefzilla1501 |
09-13-2009 05:59 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs
(Post 6066832)
I watched the game, too.
He had no help. Bradley had a chance to get two first downs and extend drives and pussied out.
The line couldn't open holes, couldn't pass block for very long.
Was Croyle perfect? No.
But he was by far one of the best players on the field for the Chiefs.
I don't think Cassel could have done much more out there even if he was 100 percent.
|
I don't know about that. The first half of play lost us the game. We didn't get any first downs until the final minutes of the half. When I saw the 20 minutes TOP in the first half, my first comment in the bar was "the defense is going to be completely gassed."
I don't blame Brodie for that. That's what I would expect from a backup QB playing behind this o-line. But I think most people would agree that Cassel would have gotten off to a better, quicker start.
As I've always said, I really like Croyle. He's a really good QB. but his injury history is still a major concern and I still laugh at anyone who thinks that one injury-free game suddenly makes him less of an injury concern. He has to prove that he can play 15 more injury-free games as a starter to ever take away that label. |
