ChiefsPlanet
Page 8 of 25 « First 4567 8 910111218 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs lose to Denver and draft 3rd or 2nd (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=220599)

KC kid 12-27-2009 03:52 PM
I think a lot of the draft obviously depends on what free agents the Chiefs can get. I doubt many players will be lining up to play in KC though

Mecca 12-27-2009 03:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 6382382)
Wouldn't rule anything out with this regime, tbh. Everyone thought there was no way in hell the Chiefs would draft Tyson Jackson at 3......
That's the complete opposite of taking a QB, if that is your rationale we're taking Okung.

Mecca 12-27-2009 03:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by billay (Post 6382383)
If the Chiefs didn't switch to the 3-4 they would need a 4-3 D-end.
And there are likely to be 2 really nice prospects for that....

KC kid 12-27-2009 03:53 PM
How would Tyson Jackson look at a tackle in the 4-3 next to dorsey?

LaChapelle 12-27-2009 03:54 PM
Tampa had the toughest SOS, the Chiefs 10th
updated to last week
but that was from a Tampa Bay board

Mecca 12-27-2009 03:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC kid (Post 6382396)
How would Tyson Jackson look at a tackle in the 4-3 next to dorsey?
It doesn't matter the odds of us ever going back to 4-3 are less than Pioli admitting he ****ed up on Cassel.

Dayze 12-27-2009 03:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC kid (Post 6382396)
How would Tyson Jackson look at a tackle in the 4-3 next to dorsey?
i'm not sure he can rush to the level that's needed in a 4-3.

KC kid 12-27-2009 03:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6382399)
It doesn't matter the odds of us ever going back to 4-3 are less than Pioli admitting he ****ed up on Cassel.
That is probably true. I was just thinking about how much I like Carlos Dunlap

Titty Meat 12-27-2009 03:56 PM
It's funny how theres 2 teams who are the same as the Chiefs (Bucs & Browns) each time is making a coaching change at the end of the season yet the Chiefs will keep Haley.

chiefzilla1501 12-27-2009 03:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by billay (Post 6382363)
A Gimmick offense? Cassel would benefit from a shotgun 2 RB offense. Charles can't run the ball 20 times a game for the whole season. You'd have 2 playmakers on the field which would be hard to cover and you one of them can return kicks. It would only help the offense.
A shotgun 2 RB offense is a gimmick. How many teams run this consistently? It's a gimmick because almost no offensive coach would do it. Even Payton went from using Bush as a gimmick to getting down to basics--and he's as good of an offensive mind as you'll find. A team averages about 30 carries a game. You give Spiller 20, you give a power back 5 (change of pace). How many does that leave for Charles? You're talking about an offense that would limit your ONLY playmaker to less than 10 carries? Really?

And I don't care about forming an offense Cassel is comfortable with. He needs to prove he can run in a pro offense or he doesn't belong as a starter.

KC kid 12-27-2009 03:56 PM
The more I think about it, Berry really is the only option

Titty Meat 12-27-2009 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6382407)
A shotgun 2 RB offense is a gimmick. How many teams run this consistently? It's a gimmick because almost no offensive coach would do it. Even Payton went from using Bush as a gimmick to getting down to basics--and he's as good of an offensive mind as you'll find. A team averages about 30 carries a game. You give Spiller 20, you give a power back 5 (change of pace). How many does that leave for Charles? You're talking about an offense that would limit your ONLY playmaker to less than 10 carries? Really?

And I don't care about forming an offense Cassel is comfortable with. He needs to prove he can run in a pro offense or he doesn't belong as a starter.
You're right we should just lineup in the I-Formation every time and hand the ball off to our RB who is a Fullback like you suggested. Lets draft Toby Gerhart!

Dayze 12-27-2009 03:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by billay (Post 6382406)
It's funny how theres 2 teams who are the same as the Chiefs (Bucs & Browns) each time is making a coaching change at the end of the season yet the Chiefs will keep Haley.
those teams, obviously, aren't utilizing "the process"

:D

chiefzilla1501 12-27-2009 04:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by billay (Post 6382416)
You're right we should just lineup in the I-Formation every time and hand the ball off to our RB who is a Fullback like you suggested. Lets draft Toby Gerhart!
Where in the world did you get that I think the Chiefs should hand off a lot of passes to a fullback?

chiefzilla1501 12-27-2009 04:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC kid (Post 6382408)
The more I think about it, Berry really is the only option
There's Berry....And then there's the backup plan if Berry isn't available. That sums up our draft options.

If Berry isn't available, the best option is to trade down (with the fat chance that a team will trade up to take Suh).


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52 PM.
Page 8 of 25 « First 4567 8 910111218 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.