ChiefsPlanet
Page 8 of 10 « First 4567 8 910
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Teicher: Waters thinks Chiefs don’t need offensive-line upgrade (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=221120)

Brock 01-05-2010 05:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerPig (Post 6412619)
Those times could be contributed to either overly-conservative playcalling (Schottenheimer) or lack of defense (Vermeil).
Or maybe, just maybe, a lack of playmakers.

FAX 01-05-2010 05:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6412624)
Look at his pass blocking in the first half of the season compared to the second half.

Not even close.

http://profootballfocus.com/by_playe...&playerid=4329
Add two tablespoons of experience, a pint of coaching, and fifty gallons of Charles and you have a recipe for improved play at that position.

FAX

DaneMcCloud 01-05-2010 05:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAX (Post 6412627)
I think (think) that Albert is improving, but I'm not sure. I like the fact that the coaches are working with him on his technique. I do believe that, if he masters the technique necessary to play NFL left tackle, he could be excellent.
This really isn't the main issue. Albert played at an extremely high level last year in Gailey's scheme. Haley and Muir changed from that scheme to a zone blocking scheme.

If Haley and Muir had been here in 2008, Albert would have never been drafted. They're forcing a square peg in a round hole and to Albert's credit, he's making the adjustment nicely.

I expect him to become even more comfortable after working in this scheme for the next 9 full months.

TigerPig 01-05-2010 05:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6412629)
Or maybe, just maybe, a lack of playmakers.
Schottenheimer = DT...enough said. He may have not been offense, but all Marty had to do with that defense is put up 14 or so. And he didn't.

Brock 01-05-2010 06:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerPig (Post 6412649)
Schottenheimer = DT...enough said. He may have not been offense, but all Marty had to do with that defense is put up 14 or so. And he didn't.
Didn't really matter, the teams with playmakers like Dallas and SF were way, way ahead of anything coming out of KC at that point.

HemiEd 01-05-2010 06:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6412624)
Look at his pass blocking in the first half of the season compared to the second half.

Not even close.

http://profootballfocus.com/by_playe...&playerid=4329
milkman called this early in the season, the guy has been right about Albert since early in his last year of school.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6412629)
Or maybe, just maybe, a lack of playmakers.
Exactly

googlegoogle 01-05-2010 06:20 PM
Only Pioli and haley have answers and they aren't going to tell us because it compromises us in the draft.

Other teams read this shit.

TigerPig 01-05-2010 06:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by googlegoogle (Post 6412735)
Other teams read this shit.
ROFL

Its funny cause its, sadly, probably true. :-) Now whose screen names are the culprits?

Chiefnj2 01-05-2010 08:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6412624)
Look at his pass blocking in the first half of the season compared to the second half.

Not even close.

http://profootballfocus.com/by_playe...&playerid=4329
Looks like he does better against OLB's in a 34 than he does 43 ends.

OnTheWarpath15 01-05-2010 09:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6412629)
Or maybe, just maybe, a lack of playmakers.
This Brock guy GETS IT.

Just Passin' By 01-05-2010 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6412629)
Or maybe, just maybe, a lack of playmakers.
That reason isn't allowed for Haley and company. Why should it be allowed for previous administrations?

OnTheWarpath15 01-05-2010 09:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6413440)
That reason isn't allowed for Haley and company. Why should it be allowed for previous administrations?
He's not excusing previous regimes, dipshit. He's actually criticizing them.

If you had any history here other than defending your Master, you'd get that.

Brock 01-05-2010 09:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6413440)
That reason isn't allowed for Haley and company. Why should it be allowed for previous administrations?
Most of the previous regimes were at least competent gameday coaches. Marty Schottenheimer and Dick Vermeil, for all their faults, didn't repeatedly stick their heads up their own asses, the way Haley seems to do on a weekly basis.

Mr. Laz 01-05-2010 09:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6412547)
You're a dumb****. Albert just spent 16 games learning how to play with new technique in a new body. He FINALLY got it down by game 16. ****ing with him now is uber-fail.

He's gonna be awesome next year.
:Poke:


ROFL

Just Passin' By 01-05-2010 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6413450)
He's not excusing previous regimes, dipshit. He's actually criticizing them.

If you had any history here other than defending your Master, you'd get that.
Perhaps you should try re-reading. You seem to have a habit of not bothering to read things properly the first time.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 AM.
Page 8 of 10 « First 4567 8 910
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.