Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6564929)

Faulk is 100% correct.

If I'm a stud QB prospect in high school, the last place I'm going is to the U of F if I'm interested in going to the next level.

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6564929)

Faulk is 100% correct.

If I'm a stud QB prospect in high school, the last place I'm going is to the U of F if I'm interested in going to the next level.

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6564933)

He's definitely right.

The funny thing about Mayock is that this debate mirrors his public perception.

Spread Option QBs look great at first, just like he did. Then, the more you see them, the more you realize they aren't suited for the pro game, just like the more you see Mayock, the more you realize he's a ****tard.

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6054510)

And this is based on your infinite knowledge of the future? Have you watched him play or is this more anti-UT bias?(btw I am not a huge UT fan but I do watch all their games)

He has a measured 4.4.. Welker I believe was a 4.6

So what other UT WRs failed in the NFL? Roy Williams? Limas Sweed seems to be catching on with the Steelers... How about Jermichael Finley(played TE/WR) Kyle Shanahan? (oops, ok forget that one)

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6054691)

I've watched enough Big XII and UT games to know what a good college player and what a good pro prospect are and how they are discrete entities. When Shipley runs a 4.4 at a scouting combine, I'll eat my hat.

He does not have a "measured 4.4". He has a guestimated 4.4. He also has a guestimated 4.51. There's a reason why guys run 40s at the combine and they take height/weight measurements. It's because you can't trust measurements from the school. He doesn't have speed. He also doesn't have Wes Welker's quickness. He's also coming from a program that doesn't produce pro prospects that correlate to their hype.

We are all well aware of the fact that you watch all UT games. Whether it's your pimping of Colt McCoy, or your continued pumping up of Michigan products, like that douchebag who had good bench #s and you wanted us to spend a fifth on, you can't be trusted to give an honest analysis of the players that you have the most investment in.

Originally Posted by Priest31kc (Post 6565007)

Wow, Tate will not be available w/ our 2nd pick. A 4.36? Didnt expect that from him.

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6565015)

I'm thinking Benn may be there at 50, and I'd love to make that pick.

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6565033)

Abso****inglutely.

And ROFL at Shipley.

Makes me wonder if Bryant would have run a 4.7+