DJ's left nut |
02-11-2011 01:44 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud
(Post 7424347)
The main point I've tried to stress throughout this thread is that the Chiefs need to improve the interior of their defense and it would be foolish to pass on anyone that could do so because Belcher's is on the roster. I also believe it would be easier to upgrade the TED position than find a Raji/Ngata type that can immediately step in and upgrade the NT. I think they'll find an upgrade (I mean, that have to, right?) but that doesn't mean it'll solve all of their interior issues.
|
Any upgrade at ILB will be marginalized if we have no NT. To quantify it, lets say that Belcher is an 80 ILB and Hawk is a 90, gaining you 10 points. Well the fact that we still don't have a damn NT is going to drag Hawk down to production levels far closer to those achieved by an 80 LB than he would've.
In other words - you're simply patching a hole in the dike and you're doing so fairly ineffectively. In the process, you're eliminating the possibility that Belcher could continue to develop and be one of those guys. If you don't have a true NT in place, the difference in production from Belcher to Hawk is going to be marginal.
Quote:
First off, no where have I stated that I'm "ready to give up". Belcher made a nice leap from season one to season two but he has limited physical talent (mainly speed) and his quickness, strength and instincts need to improve before he can be considered a long term solution. A few others have mentioned that they saw him consistently pushed out of the play by opposing guards, so it's not just me.
|
And Bart Scott is a burner? You sarcastically noted that I wrote Scott off as an elite ILB but I've done nothing of the sort. I've simply noted that he's not Hercules out there throwing guards around and blowing up every running play. He's also not terribly fast. However, he's still been a good ILB, in fact he's one of the best. This simply my previous position - no ILB, no matter how good they are, simply tosses guards out of the way with abandon. All the while, Scott has done this well with phsycal attributes that aren't terribly dissimilar to Belchers. They're both guys that are going to play around 240 (Belcher will absolutely end up there when he's Scott's age and likely far sooner). They're both guys that run a 40 in the 4.8 range.
What makes Scott so good is the fact that he's fearless, he's mean and he's smart. Belcher has the first 2 covered and the last may well come with time. Recall, Scott wasn't anything until 2005 when he was in his 5th season and was 26 years old. Oh, and he came into the league as an undrafted free agent out of a small college.
If anything, Bart Scott perfectly exemplifies why we shouldn't be so eager to 'upgrade' from Belcher until we truly know what we have in him. There's absolutely nothing, not a single thing, in his performance to date or his physical skill set that would preclude him from becoming exactly the player you have cited as someone that should replace him.
|