ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   News Green Day singer booted off flight because of saggy pants (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249443)

Backwards Masking 09-03-2011 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7876360)
You really are one stipud mother****er.

Why? I've already stated I've never understood the baggy shorts look, much less worn them. I just don't think peolple should be getting kicked off of planes and refused service for sporting them. And any 33 year old that thinks men should have their shirts tucked in at all times to the point where he rants about it on the interweb is probably pretty boring. Can't imagine he knows much how to party.

milkman 09-03-2011 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking (Post 7876423)
Why? I've already stated I've never understood the baggy shorts look, much less worn them. I just don't think peolple should be getting kicked off of planes and refused service for sporting them. And any 33 year old that thinks men should have their shirts tucked in at all times to the point where he rants about it on the interweb is probably pretty boring. Can't imagine he knows much how to party.

You're a stupid mother****er because you apparently think that saul was saying that he, specifically, is the target demographic.

Saul Good 09-03-2011 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking (Post 7876423)
Why? I've already stated I've never understood the baggy shorts look, much less worn them. I just don't think peolple should be getting kicked off of planes and refused service for sporting them. And any 33 year old that thinks men should have their shirts tucked in at all times to the point where he rants about it on the interweb is probably pretty boring. Can't imagine he knows much how to party.

When you can't win the argument, create a straw man. Nice work.

He didn't get kicked off for having his pants down. He could have pulled them up, and everyone would have been on their way. He got kicked off for cussing at a flight attendant and not complying with the company's rules. This isn't that complicated.

007 09-03-2011 01:07 PM

these are the some of the same people that don't understand why they can't find a job when dressed like an idiot.

Backwards Masking 09-03-2011 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KurtCobain (Post 7876357)
Not the same thing though. Metallica is Metallica, and Greenday is Greenday, think about what you're posting.

They're both rock American rock bands, ones just more metal, ones more pop punk. RnR has the same attitude through most genres, it stands for rebellion, independence, giving the man the finger and never growing up. Or at least it's supposed to. GD still has many millions of fans that go along with that line of thinking, maybe not as many at metcallica, but still a whole damn lot. like i said before, if 100 of them see this article and fly elsewhere, thats 20k lost to SW.

Backwards Masking 09-03-2011 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7876436)
You're a stupid mother****er because you apparently think that saul was saying that he, specifically, is the target demographic.

touche, ill get you that, my sarcasm meter was off. 33's not terribly old though, not majorly far away from the demographic, like 50-60.

dirk digler 09-03-2011 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7876406)
I disagree. They didn't want this to turn into a big deal. There was a similar incident with a woman whose skirt was too short a year or two ago.

http://plancksconstant.org/blog1/200...rt_to_fly.html

First off, I am always disappointed whenever some petty functionary worries himself over some minor dress issue when there are bigger threats to the security of this country. One would think that airline officials should be troubling themselves over the threat of Islamic terror instead of acting like Islamic terrorists who think scantily clad women are like sizzling steaks.

Here's the story:

Pantagraph,
Airline tells woman skirt too short to fly

SAN DIEGO -- A 23-year-old woman who boarded a Southwest Airlines plane in a short skirt for a flight to Arizona says she was led off the plane for wearing an outfit that was considered too skimpy.

Kyla Ebbert said a Southwest employee asked her to leave her seat while the plane was preparing to leave San Diego's Lindbergh Field on July 3.

Ebbert, a student who was headed to Tucson for a doctor's appointment, said Friday on NBC's "Today" show that the employee told her she would have to catch a later flight.

"You're dressed inappropriately. This is a family airline. You're too provocative to fly on this plane," she quoted the employee as saying.

"I said, 'What part is it? The shirt? The skirt? Which part?' And he said the whole thing."

Ebbert was eventually allowed back on the plane after offering to adjust her sweater but said she was humiliated and embarrassed.

We will agree to disagree. I think they realized this crew ****ed up just like the crew that ****ed up with the lady.

SW doesn't have a dress code so this really comes down to individuals deciding for themselves what they deem appropriate or not.

Quote:

And here’s the kicker: On the return flight, she not only wore the same outfit and encountered no trouble whatsoever from the Tucson-to-San Diego crew, but she told Lauer that one flight attendant actually complimented her.
Quote:

Ebbert said she found out later from a reporter that Southwest did not have a specific dress code. (That was reported by the San Diego Union-Tribune, who quoted a company spokesperson as saying a passenger could conceivably wear a bikini top as long as all the proper spots are covered.)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20641687.../#.TmJ6SF35N9s

007 09-03-2011 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking (Post 7876446)
They're both rock American rock bands, ones just more metal, ones more pop punk. RnR has the same attitude through most genres, it stands for rebellion, independence, giving the man the finger and never growing up. Or at least it's supposed to. GD still has many millions of fans that go along with that line of thinking, maybe not as many at metcallica, but still a whole damn lot. like i said before, if 100 of them see this article and fly elsewhere, thats 20k lost to SW.

SW won't lose a single dime over this. Hell, they might even get customers they didn't before because of it.

Backwards Masking 09-03-2011 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7876438)
When you can't win the argument, create a straw man. Nice work.

He didn't get kicked off for having his pants down. He could have pulled them up, and everyone would have been on their way. He got kicked off for cussing at a flight attendant and not complying with the company's rules. This isn't that complicated.

he didnt want to pull them up, he still would have gotten kicked off without cussing at the flight attendant. not pulling them up is not complying with the company's rules, you didn't need to separate them.

Backwards Masking 09-03-2011 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 7876453)
We will agree to disagree. I think they realized this crew ****ed up just like the crew that ****ed up with the lady.

SW doesn't have a dress code so this really comes down to individuals deciding for themselves what they deem appropriate or not.





http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20641687.../#.TmJ6SF35N9s

Yep. SW was clearly in the wrong, and admitted they were. Argument over.

Backwards Masking 09-03-2011 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 7876454)
SW won't lose a single dime over this. Hell, they might even get customers they didn't before because of it.

you dont know that the former, though the latter, i admit, IS possible.

007 09-03-2011 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking (Post 7876470)
you dont know that the former, though the latter, i admit, IS possible.

No, I don't know that but it is my opinion so I don't have to know it :)

Spott 09-03-2011 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking (Post 7876465)
Yep. SW was clearly in the wrong, and admitted they were. Argument over.

That apology was only made because the guy was famous. If it was the typical idiot/thug that walks around holding his pants up with one hand because he's too stupid to figure out how a belt works, SW would have said nothing.

Saul Good 09-03-2011 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking (Post 7876465)
Yep. SW was clearly in the wrong, and admitted they were. Argument over.

Show me where they admitted it.

Backwards Masking 09-03-2011 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7876491)
Show me where they admitted it.

"As soon as we became aware of what had happened, we reached out to apologize for this customer's experience," said Brad Hawkins, a Southwest spokesman. "He elected to take the next flight. We followed up with this customer and involved employees to get more details and, in our latest conversations, understand from the customer the situation was resolved to his satisfaction."


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.