ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs The playcalling difference... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=253956)

RINGLEADER 12-19-2011 02:24 PM

Part of it was because we were facing an average defense.

Part of it was because the Packers were selling out against the run and Orton made them pay.

Part of it was because Orton was rarely pressured and when he was he took it like a man.

Part of it was because the offense controlled TOP and the defense weren't out there every 5 minutes.

BigMeatballDave 12-19-2011 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Beans (Post 8219697)
It seems we've come to a chicken or the egg style debate here...

Could we not say that the QB and the play calling are co-evolutionary forces, each playing off one another, the confluence of the two resulting in the postive outcome we're debating today?

Possibly. I know what I saw though.

I saw a QB who could read a D.
Who looked confident in the pocket.
Who went through his progressions quickly.
Who has a quicker release.
WHO LOOKED DOWNFIELD AND HIT OPEN RECEIVERS.

Red Beans 12-19-2011 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8219776)
Possibly. I know what I saw though.

I saw a QB who could read a D.
Who looked confident in the pocket.
Who went through his progressions quickly.
Who has a quicker release.
WHO LOOKED DOWNFIELD AND HIT OPEN RECEIVERS.

I agree. He looked like the best QB we've had under center in the last several seasons.

htismaqe 12-19-2011 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Beans (Post 8219769)
I'm not saying he didn't. I'm saying they ran him outside more than they have all year. That's all I'm saying. I'm not talking about his stats, becasue while you may have pointed out he played no differently, and maybe worse than his averages, he was effective as a greater part of a more effective offense. His individual play wasn't any better, but his role was better, his useage was timed better...

Except that they didn't. He had 2 middle runs, 2 offtackle runs (1 left, 1 right) and one toss play (I think it was a toss right?), all for a grand total of 2.78 yards per carry. In the running game, he wasn't any different than usual.

In the screen game, he absolutely was more effective and it was 100% because of Orton selling the action. Running a screen means allowing pass rushers to come to the QB in order to sell it - Cassel can't do it without panic. I've seen it up close and in person.

Dave Lane 12-19-2011 02:28 PM

There is a lot of obtuseness in this thread.

DaWolf 12-19-2011 02:59 PM

1) The QB play was competent
2) The D we played is not very good when they don't cause turnovers

BigMeatballDave 12-19-2011 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 8219860)
1) The QB play was competent
2) The D we played is not very good when they don't cause turnovers

More or less. However, they've looked bad on O vs shittier Ds

trndobrd 12-19-2011 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8219763)
The defense has to respect the passing game for the first time in forever. Mike McCarthy even said so.

Link?

Hog's Gone Fishin 12-19-2011 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 8219165)
Playcalling looked about the same to me. The difference is that we had a QB who could execute.

Orton shows to be 10 x better than Cassel. And Orton sucks. Well actually he doesn't suck now that he's a Chief.

ReynardMuldrake 12-19-2011 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trndobrd (Post 8219975)
Link?

I heard McCarthy called Orton a "damned good" quarterback.

DaKCMan AP 12-19-2011 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 8219759)
A draw is not the power slam we have been trying with him all season. I am not talking about a draw. Get rid of the draw for this discussion. He is designed to run the draw. He is not designed to power it up the middle like we have seen them attempt to do time and time and time again, except yesterday.

Do you just make this stuff up?

You mean the draw like these? During our previous 4 games?

Den @ KC
2nd quarter
1-10-KC 43 (2:13) (Shotgun) 22-D.McCluster left guard to KC 45 for 2 yards (55-D.Williams).

KC @ NE
1st quarter
3-7-KC 23 (14:24) (Shotgun) 22-D.McCluster right end to KC 29 for 6 yards (74-K.Love).
3rd quarter
1-10-NE 43 (5:28) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 22-D.McCluster up the middle to NE 41 for 2 yards (98-G.Warren).

Pit @ KC
3rd quarter
2-1-KC 43 (2:02) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 22-D.McCluster up the middle to KC 45 for 2 yards (99-B.Keisel).
4th quarter
1-10-PIT 30 (8:51) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 22-D.McCluster right end to PIT 30 for no gain (93-J.Worilds).

KC @ Chi
3rd quarter
3-4-CHI 12 (8:24) (Shotgun) 22-D.McCluster left tackle to CHI 5 for 7 yards (20-C.Steltz).
3-10-CHI 10 (7:02) (Shotgun) 22-D.McCluster left guard to CHI 3 for 7 yards (55-L.Briggs).
3-12-KC 22 (5:21) (Shotgun) 22-D.McCluster right end to KC 25 for 3 yards (90-J.Peppers).

Chiefaholic 12-19-2011 05:06 PM

I don't credit Muir for playcalling, the credit goes to a QB who checks down and actually puts the damn ball in the vicinity for the WR to catch it. In no way, shape, or form is Kyle Orton a franchise QB, but he's leaps and bounds better than Cassel or Palco. Next season we still need to draft a QB high in the draft if it's optional, sign Orton to a 2-3 year deal, and groom the two youngsters to lead this franchise for years to come.

Hammock Parties 12-19-2011 05:08 PM

I honestly think most of it was just Green Bay's defense.

They are that bad.

I would not expect the line to give Orton that much time the next two weeks. Especially in Denver.

Extra Point 12-19-2011 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReynardMuldrake (Post 8219158)
Yeah, I got giddy seeing Orton call an audible yesterday. I'd forgotten what those looked like!

Glad you brought that up!

How many times did Neckbeard call an audible?

At their 1-3 yard line, why the Hell didn't we run on all downs, into the A or B gap, with Battle? We can't pass in the red zone; there's not enough yardage, to do so.

Extra Point 12-19-2011 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefaholic (Post 8220292)
I don't credit Muir for playcalling, the credit goes to a QB who checks down and actually puts the damn ball in the vicinity for the WR to catch it. In no way, shape, or form is Kyle Orton a franchise QB, but he's leaps and bounds better than Cassel or Palco. Next season we still need to draft a QB high in the draft if it's optional, sign Orton to a 2-3 year deal, and groom the two youngsters to lead this franchise for years to come.

Zone reads is something that Orton can do, that Cassel can't.

Cassel can't think into that; Orton can.

Orton ~ Gannon (I don't have a double squiggly key. Sorry)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.