ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Cassel has a concussion. (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=264784)

ROYC75 10-07-2012 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8990128)
Tell it to the 2-2 Colts who have a badass mother****er QB, you dumbshit redneck.

Check the 2 HC's and come back to me with your answer.

ROYC75 10-07-2012 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8990133)
Plunkett and Gannon were not dog shit before they improved.

Shit, Plunkett threw 19 TDs in his FIRST SEASON.

Quinn has career numbers comparable to BRODIE CROYLE.

But both were given up on before finding their burst.

FAX 10-07-2012 08:20 PM

I'm confused.

Doesn't a concussion require that you actually have a brain?

FAX

Brock 10-07-2012 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROYC75 (Post 8990078)
All the reason why I have never been one for losing to better a draft pick. Losing does not breed confidence into the team & players, winning does! Losing only paints a loser type image to other potential FA's later in the off season.

No franchise QB - nothing else matters.

Coogs 10-07-2012 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8989926)
We were balanced before.

We're going full Tebowtard.

Game one was 33 passes 33 rushes
Game two was 42 passes 24 rushes
Game three was 44 passes 45 rushes
Game four was 42 passes 22 rushes

Balanced twice. Cassel twice. Tebow once.

Messier 10-07-2012 08:22 PM

The sad part about this game is that the Ravens were primed and ready for a road let down. They were ready to roll over and add this game to the list of road losses to lesser teams, but the Chiefs were determined to make sure that didn't happen. The Chiefs had to work to lose this game, it wasn't easy.

Estron 10-07-2012 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CosmicPal (Post 8989858)
We had that game won. It's really sad, because we had a definable chance to win that game and we'd all be one big happy family right now.

Nope. Fully ninety percent of the membership here don't want the Chiefs to win another game this season. These are the Chiefs fans who boo at victory.

Hammock Parties 10-07-2012 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8990174)
Game one was 33 passes 33 rushes
Game two was 42 passes 24 rushes
Game three was 44 passes 45 rushes
Game four was 42 passes 22 rushes

Balanced twice. Cassel twice. Tebow once.

Yeah but we came out every game with the idea that we wanted to run a balanced offense.

This game we decided "**** it, let's go back to the stone age and avoid any chance of turning it over."

Now with a backup QB who has a history of sucking hard, we'll be even more committed to that philosophy.

O.city 10-07-2012 08:28 PM

At this point, what do you have to lose by tossing it around?


You can't just run it

Messier 10-07-2012 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8990189)
Yeah but we came out every game with the idea that we wanted to run a balanced offense.

This game we decided "**** it, let's go back to the stone age and avoid any chance of turning it over."

Now with a backup QB who has a history of sucking hard, we'll be even more committed to that philosophy.

It looked like a gameplan, but it wasn't even a gameplan. A game plan would've been, run, run ,run, then play action pass. Repeat. This was just run like it's 1992 Nebraska football.

Estron 10-07-2012 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 8989969)
Negative. Get your butt back in the starting lineup. We need Geno Smith.

What evidence is there that the Chiefs will draft Smith or any other QB even with a favorable position in the 2013 draft?

ROYC75 10-07-2012 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 8990134)
You think the Chiefs are winning seven games?

Probably so now after losing the last 2 games at home with the upcoming schedule.

Which takes us out of the 1st rd stud QB unless we trade up in the draft. Then we still have Pioli & Crennel, I understand why many here wants to lose. But the bottom line is it's not written that Clark is going to get rid of either, sure he would if the fans revolt and renew season tickets.

But almost everyone here all off year long was saying, we have so much talent, offense & defense, all Cassel has to do is not turn it over, we win.

Well ..... the whole teams is in turnover mode. Reason we are 1 - 4 and looking pathetic.

Today's game was the best all around performance we had to date this year. I'm just saying if BQ comes in and does not turn it over as Cassel does and this team continues to get better, we have a balanced game plan,we will win 7 to 8 of our final games.

Brock 10-07-2012 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Estron (Post 8990212)
What evidence is there that the Chiefs will draft Smith or any other QB even with a favorable position in the 2013 draft?

Uh...because it's the biggest need this team has, and without one you'll never win anything?

Pablo 10-07-2012 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Estron (Post 8990212)
What evidence is there that the Chiefs will draft Smith or any other QB even with a favorable position in the 2013 draft?

Because our hopefully new GM and HC will realize they'll never win anything or keep their jobs without one.

Brock 10-07-2012 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROYC75 (Post 8990213)
But almost everyone here all off year long was saying, we have so much talent, offense & defense, all Cassel has to do is not turn it over, we win.
.

We win what? Nobody thought this team was going win playoff games with Matt Cassel.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.