duncan_idaho |
08-19-2014 08:33 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501
(Post 10831534)
I don't think it's a hard story. The Chiefs decided to rebuild but make it enjoyable to watch. I don't think it's a competing philosophy. Judging by the way we negotiated contracts this off-season and dorseys style with the Packers, this year is much more representative of how the team will probably be run all years forward. So over five years, we will look back and probably see year 1 as unusual. Some may disagree with me, but I don't think letting the team tank last year was ever an option. I think Clark hunt gave the ultimatum to at least make the team watchable in 2013 and it's hard to blame him.
|
That still doesn't mean it makes sense as a viable long-term approach for doing things.
If "being respectable" was truly mandated in 2013, and that's what led to the Alex Smith deal, all the FA signings, etc, with anything other than the goal of building a long-term winner in mind, **** Clark Hunt.
Now, maybe Alex Smith really is a guy they looked at as bridging the gap between this prospective "ultimatum" to not suck and building long-term. Maybe. If that's the case, and Andy Reid really likes him that much, it makes signing him long-term even more important.
Problem is, all those shitty FA signings from 2013 to satisfy this prospective "ultimatum" potentially handcuff the Chiefs in keeping Smith and actually retaining the best young player on their roster (Justin Houston).
If Clark Hunt put Dorsey in that spot and is to blame for the competing and counter-productive approaches, **** him.
But that would still be better than Dorsey flip-flopping his approach from year to year.
|