![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'll stand strong until Alex shows me what he can do (again) with a decent OL and WR corps. If KC upgrades there, and he still plays small ball, 1 read, 3 yd per pass? Then, I will be done for sure. Not even worried about that. I have zero doubt that Alex will play well if KC can do what needs to be done. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And that would be a totally whitlock thing to do. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
QB rating is the most worthless statistic kept in pro football. According to the NFL, this stat line is a great game: 14/18, 90 yards, 2TD, 0INT. 124.5 rating, in a game where said QB's team lost by 20 points. The quickest way for me to devalue your football opinions is to use QB rating as an indicator of QB play. |
Matt Cassel is a good QB
|
Comparing Green to Smith is nearly impossible.
As much as Smith sucked this season (and the offensive line is definitely part of the reason), Trent Green wouldn't have lasted two games with this line. In terms of being "injury prone", Trent Green needed three full years to fully recover from an ACL tear. He would have been knocked into retirement behind the 2014 offensive line. The line doesn't exonerate Smith's poor play and lack of TD's to WR's or his inability to thread the needle. But if the Reid and Dorsey want to avoid sitting home in January for the remainder of their tenure, they'll need to fix this offensive line as quickly as possible. Otherwise, they'll both be looking for work by 2017. Edit: Oh, and find some guys that can catch the freakin' ball. |
Quote:
One has a career 82.8 rating, the other has a career 80.1. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
this part made me chuckle. |
Quote:
We still get chuckles out of Tim Teblow and everybody's happy to hammer the last nail in Manning's coffin. All while we spend years trying to rationalize being okay with Matt Cassel and Alex Smith. Stockholm syndrome? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.