ChiefsPlanet
Page 8 of 66 « First 4567 8 91011121858 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   KU ***** OFFICIAL 2015 KANSAS FOOTBALL THREAD ***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=289748)

kcchiefsus 03-26-2015 10:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404452)
That's true. It feels nice to not be owned by anyone.

But if I'm a TCU fan what choice do I have?
You and PB should get it over with finally and **** each other or suck each other dicks or something.

Imon Yourside 03-26-2015 10:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11404305)
It'd be hilarious if Mizzou could ever just win their league
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/btHFguYFgJ0?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

KC native 03-26-2015 11:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11404424)
But the point Bambs is that TCU had to take whatever we gave them. A half membership is worth $13m this year alone. What were they gonna do, turn that down to take $3m? To not be able to play Texas and Baylor and OU and Tech? What effing leverage did those little turds have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404452)
That's true. It feels nice to not be owned by anyone.

But if I'm a TCU fan what choice do I have?
LMAO

We played Baylor, OU, and Tech as their out of conference games regularly before joining the Big 12. Don't let that get in your way.

How much does it piss you off that we're better than you in every way except for early NCAA tournament exits?

Bambi 03-26-2015 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11404628)
LMAO

We played Baylor, OU, and Tech as their out of conference games regularly before joining the Big 12. Don't let that get in your way.

How much does it piss you off that we're better than you in every way except for early NCAA tournament exits?
"better than you"?

lol, what are you 12?

Bambi 03-26-2015 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 11404187)
Sure.

Thanks for keeping KU Football at the top of the forum and most importantly, #1 in your heart. I never have trouble finding it....unlike the TCU thread.
It's KU. Other than the Chiefs it's the most popular program on CP.

Mr_Tomahawk 03-26-2015 12:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404765)
It's KU. Other than the Chiefs it's the most popular program on CP.
I agree.

KC native 03-26-2015 12:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404763)
"better than you"?

lol, what are you 12?
Yes, better than you.

I don't have to lie about the TCU program or other programs to make my arguments like you do.

Saul Good 03-26-2015 01:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404399)
TCU replaced Missouri and A&M with a much more successful football program than both those schools.

However you have to know your place if you're TCU when it takes schools with a much bigger brand like Nebraska to leave before you even get a seat at the table.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11404424)
But the point Bambs is that TCU had to take whatever we gave them. A half membership is worth $13m this year alone. What were they gonna do, turn that down to take $3m? To not be able to play Texas and Baylor and OU and Tech? What effing leverage did those little turds have?
It is an interesting point. The Big 12 brought in a school with fewer than 10k students and is going to hand 10% of its payouts to them. TCU, by far the smallest school involved in major conference realignment, is milking the conference for all it's worth...so they must have had quite a bit of leverage.

Outgoing schools had 150,000 total students. Incoming schools had 30,000. Pretty sweet deal for those two schools if you ask me.

Bambi 03-26-2015 01:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11404780)
Yes, better than you.

I don't have to lie about the TCU program or other programs to make my arguments like you do.
You don't have any championships. What are you better in?

Bambi 03-26-2015 01:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11404794)
It is an interesting point. The Big 12 brought in a school with fewer than 10k students and is going to hand 10% of its payouts to them. TCU, by far the smallest school involved in major conference realignment, is milking the conference for all it's worth...so they must have had quite a bit of leverage.

Outgoing schools had 150,000 total students. Incoming schools had 30,000. Pretty sweet deal for those two schools if you ask me.
Conferences have always shifted since college sports began.

Schools of consequence are never the ones that move though.

To the Big 12 the schools that left are no different than the schools that joined. All involved in "realignment" are simply here to facilitate games for the blue-bloods.

Saul Good 03-26-2015 01:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404814)
Conferences have always shifted since college sports began.

Schools of consequence are never the ones that move though.

To the Big 12 the schools that left are no different than the schools that joined. All involved in "realignment" are simply here to facilitate games for the blue-bloods.
What schools won the last two national championships in basketball? It seems like they both just moved conferences.

The Big 12 has 2 football national championships ever. Nebraska had 3 in the past 20 seasons when they left.

Bambi 03-26-2015 01:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11404836)
What schools won the last two national championships in basketball? It seems like they both just moved conferences.

The Big 12 has 2 football national championships ever. Nebraska had 3 in the past 20 seasons when they left.
Not sure what your point is.

Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas all won National Championships while members of the Big 12.

Those are the blue-bloods I'm referring to.

In reference to your basketball point. Both UConn and Louisville left the Big East because that conference does not have full participation in football. Both UConn and Louisville desire to play football in Division 1.

They had no problem winning the Big East. Teams like TAMU, Nebraska, Missouri, etc. could never win their own league so they left. They still can't win their league. Like I said, fodder.

Prison Bitch 03-26-2015 02:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11404794)
It is an interesting point. The Big 12 brought in a school with fewer than 10k students and is going to hand 10% of its payouts to them. TCU, by far the smallest school involved in major conference realignment, is milking the conference for all it's worth...so they must have had quite a bit of leverage.

Outgoing schools had 150,000 total students. Incoming schools had 30,000. Pretty sweet deal for those two schools if you ask me.
It's really that way for nearly all refugee schools. TCU should never have been given a full cut, and likewise neither should Mizzou. (After all we know Mizzou was willing to take a partial share for the BIG which the Cornfuggers snagged from them).


If MU and ATM had a choice it was: stay or go SEC. Both were so incredibly stricken by their victimhood they had to go. So why cut them in fully?

KC native 03-26-2015 02:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404808)
You don't have any championships. What are you better in?
This is incorrect.

KC native 03-26-2015 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11404954)
It's really that way for nearly all refugee schools. TCU should never have been given a full cut, and likewise neither should Mizzou. (After all we know Mizzou was willing to take a partial share for the BIG which the Cornfuggers snagged from them).


If MU and ATM had a choice it was: stay or go SEC. Both were so incredibly stricken by their victimhood they had to go. So why cut them in fully?
LMAO

Do you honestly think TCU would have settled for not getting a full cut in perpetuity?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 PM.
Page 8 of 66 « First 4567 8 91011121858 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.