![]() |
Quote:
I'd rather have Aaron Murray than any of the shit ass pet ****er late rounders this year. That's what I didn't get. We drafted Murray and Hogan then said, "Not even gonna try developing them." Yet we'll take a jackass with zero potential to be good in Peterman? |
Watson/Mahommes-rd 1
Dobbs/Peterman-later options I like Kaaya but I think Andy wants a mobile QB |
Quote:
He showed zero ability to overcome the slightest hint of in-game adversity in college. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
If that plan blew up, try again in a different year. The problem with Chiefs fans is that whenever a QB crisis occurs when they can absolutely no longer roll with the current veteran because he's washed up/suck too much, they act like they have to solve the problem NOW. INSTANTLY. They don't think about QB development as a multi-year process. It's like Carl stepped down from GMing, but instead went into the business of mind control lasers, and he's got everybody thinking his way is the best. Thus, you get all the, "Gee, I'd love to draft a QB, but there's no Andrew Luck available at 27th overall! Next year is a better class, maybe we'll get one then!" And it's also how you get, "I don't like what Alex Smith is doing, but what should the Chiefs have done, exactly?" Uhh... how about plan ahead? But since they didn't do that, they should just be ****ing patient. |
hence why i think the chiefs will draft, if given the chance, a qb this year rather than next year in the first or second. not that they wont draft one again next year, just not as high up. again, im not privy to college games, so i don't know what is the best option realistically. just going off the fact alex will be the starter next year and possibly 18. the problem you run into is he incrementally gets better and they extend alex before 18 is up. :D
|
Quote:
Someone like Matt Hasselbeck then move on to someone like Derek Carr after a couple of years. |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Ball velocity numbers (MPH) from the Combine:<br><br>60 - Mahomes<br>59 - Webb<br>56 - Kizer<br>55 - Trubisky, Evans<br>53 - Peterman, Kaaya<br>49 - Watson</p>— Dane Brugler (@dpbrugler) <a href="https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/840334987958329346">March 10, 2017</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
That 60 MPH is impressive for Mahomes. 49 MPH on the other hand for Watson, not good. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
@dpbrugler Since 2008, only guy under 55 with any type of success is Tyrod. (Dak threw 54 but had a bum shoulder) |
That 49 MPH might kill Watson's stock. Seriously. I always thought his deep ball looked like a floater. Similar to Mariota.
Mahomes or bust IMO. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd love to know if Watson was just coasting too much or what, because 49 MPH is awful. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.