Of course. Just wanted to throw it out there.

Meanwhile, The Star is getting BBQ’d on Twitter.

No one here is saying that this isn't true, so why do you keep fighting that straw man? The point is that the editorial board slanted the narrative without saying anything whatsoever about any of the factors that don't make Hill "look even worse." Because doing that would not generate a sexy, click-worthy headline.

As if Tyreek pleading nolo contendre would have mattered compared to the plea bargain he did accept.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If the full audio makes him look worse, why the hell did KCTV5 edit it?<br><br>I’ve never seen a media outlet so openly and brazenly attack a hometown team before. They refuse to even discuss both sides of the story. <br><br>Embarrassing.</p>&mdash; Bozak Horseman (@BozakHorseman) <a href="https://twitter.com/BozakHorseman/status/1149687207755755521?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 12, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


**** #2 identified.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D_SBfx6XUAAyNfN.jpg

Plain and simple. The article is a character assassination on Hill to justify their overall bad reporting on the recent issue, which looks to not be anywhere close to everything they made it out to be or it wanted it to be.

2014 didn't happen. His record was expunged. Like it or not, Hill wasn't arrested, nor did he abuse Espinal.

The next CBA should include a clause stating that disciplinary action for off-the-field incidents must be based on a conviction in the legal system. No conviction = no discipline from the NFL.

this colleen witch was a white house correspondent

keep your ****ing politics out of my sports goddamn it

I wonder how much of this is that they really believe their source (espinals) or if it's just because they think in today's world if they refuse to backtrack everything will be ok because at least half the people reading will agree with them.

"On Thursday, Espinal filed a petition in Johnson County seeking a paternity test for their newborn twins."

What happens if/when the kids turn out to be ex-boo's? Asking for a friend.

The latter.

The Espinals could prove themselves to be totally non-credible and they'd still take their word over all others in order to protect their narrative.

Hill keeps a shitload of his money.

It seems like it was edited to make the tape look more incriminating about the kid's broken arm, not about anything about him abusing her in 2014.

KCTV's deceptive editing in this case looks a lot like what the media often does, which is to cut the facts they actually have with half-truths and lies in order to convey what they believe is true, and that they believe will eventually be borne out by the facts. Lying for a good cause, sts.

Whatever happened to just reporting the news and letting people decide how they feel about it? Why must they try to shape a bullshit narrative.

It's an opinion piece. The facts are correct. The rest is opinion. You can agree, disagree, be triggered by it, or disregard it. Up to you :shrug:

Then he good