-King- |
03-27-2022 11:04 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief
(Post 16218025)
Dude, you don't even understand how Frank Clark's contract works with the numbers you've been spouting which is miraculous as much as it's been discussed here. Don't pretend like you have any clue how this roster is built or what constraints we would otherwise face. It's embarrassing to watch people put arguments in front of you that you just ignore because somehow you can find math (with numbers that aren't even right) where we keep Tyreek Hill for this season.
And oh, this season is all that matters according to you.
|
If you feel so angry about what I'm saying and think I don't know what I'm talking about, just ignore my posts.
So what are the frank Clark numbers for this year and next year. Did we not add money to his dead cap number next year? Do you think it's a good thing to re-structure your worst defensive player and have to pay him even more when you cut him?
And no, we would still have had money in future seasons with the moves I suggested. Funny enough they were some of the same moves suggested before FA vegan and we traded Hill. Now suddenly those same moves would have cost us our future. Funny.
|