![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Why do fans insist on making lame ass nick names for players?
|
Running back by committee isn't always a bad thing. Pacheco is the pounder. CEH is the receiving back. Jet is the WTF is he going to do back. I don't know why some here place such value on designations like WR/RB1. Each has a needed skill set.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The best actual runner of the ball is Ronald Jones and they won't play him.
|
Quote:
|
My take is the Chiefs are attempting 38 passes a game and teams plan for that. The running game (or backs coming out of the backfield)is not as heavily looked upon by defensive coordinators. Andy could easily add more running plays or creative usage of the running talent and YAC skills he has in the backfield to make the offense even more devastating and harder to defend. Now maybe he doesn't because of the skills (or lack of) the offensive line has but balancing the attack even just a little more just seems like an idea worth implementing especially against teams that can't stop the run or have LB's that lack in covering backs out of the backfield.
|
There's no evidence to suggest that Pacheco is an upgrade over Clyde at this point. These knocks on CEH about a lack of vision are some of the primary knocks Pacheco also had coming into the draft, and he's done nothing to dispel them. He's really done nothing worthy of touches, other than stay ahead of Ronald Jones, which just earns him a place in the RBBC.
Sure, I hope Pacheco turns into a pro bowler but right now his hype train is running exclusively on angst about CEH and wishful thinking. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I mean shit he was good enough to not get Brady killed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Couldn’t have said it better myself. [emoji106] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.