ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Lol Geno (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=272489)

Fairplay 04-26-2013 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9630744)
BREAKING: Geno Smith's conversation with his agent last night leaked.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_Gqwi7Y96sk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>



Roots is a good movie

chiefzilla1501 04-26-2013 09:23 AM

Look, I wanted Geno too. I'm not a fan of Alex smith.

But geez, guys. You have one side treating Alex smith like a franchise qbs and another side screaming that all teams made a mistake in order to justify a reach of one full round.

Easy 6 04-26-2013 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fairplay (Post 9630761)
Geno mafia has a hit on Tomahawk

LMAO yep, its buckwheats for T.

Marcellus 04-26-2013 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9630792)
Look, I wanted Geno too. I'm not a fan of Alex smith.

But geez, guys. You have one side treating Alex smith like a franchise qbs and another side screaming that all teams made a mistake in order to justify a reach of one full round.

I was all on the Geno train until the end of the season when he played like shit, then he didnt overly impress during any of the predraft stuff.

The more you saw of him the more you had to justify the pick purely because of the "I want a drafted QB" mentality.

Eventually it was fairly obvious Geno isn't what I wanted him to be and many here still think he is. He has potential but he also has major concerns.

Reid and Dorsey weren't going to bet the next 3 years of JC, DJ, Hali, and Bowe's talent hoping it worked out. At least that's how I see it.

NorthernWV 04-26-2013 09:32 AM

McShay calls EJ Manuel a "wasted pick"

ChiefsCountry 04-26-2013 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NorthernWV (Post 9630826)
McShay calls EJ Manuel a "wasted pick"

Pretty much is. Manuel's was drafted for his arm to play in Buffalo.

RealSNR 04-26-2013 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9630633)
Part of that is because when the QB gurus were and have been proven wrong they never backed off. They didn't learn any grace from being wrong multiple times while spewing hateful stuff all over the planet over and over. So they will not be given any for they do not deserve it. They didn't earn it because they have shown the same vial behavior to all.

"Hateful stuff"

:LOL:

crazycoffey 04-26-2013 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9630852)
"Hateful stuff"

:LOL:

GENO SMITH!!!1!

RealSNR 04-26-2013 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 9630665)
Bullshit. All I ever said was that they shouldn't take him if they weren't sold on him as their franchise guy, and that it was a repeat of 2009 without Stafford, and you asshats were all over me.

And now you look as stupid as you were acting.

Wow, self-centered much? I don't have a crush on you, dipshit.

You weren't around here in the fall when htismaqe and I had to deal with all the dumbasses like BlackBob. It was ****ing awful.

O.city 04-26-2013 09:46 AM

Chiefs have the worst history in the NFL wiht QB's. Finally lose enough to put themselves in a position where QBs are usually chosen. Some on here really liked the top QB prospect.


I don't understand why thats such a bad thing I guess. Just happened to be the Chiefs sucked in a year that didn't match up with that.

Saul Good 04-26-2013 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9629915)
No dipshit...do you understand nuance?

If Geno had run a 4.4 he ABSOLUTELY goes in the first round (because god damn look at that freak run!!!)...ignore the fact that he had almost identical measurables to Aaron Rodgers though!!!!

What black QBs have slipped out of the first round because they were only average athletes and become solid NFL starters that should have been first round picks?

Russell Wilson is as close as it comes.

NorthernWV 04-26-2013 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9630869)
Chiefs have the worst history in the NFL wiht QB's. Finally lose enough to put themselves in a position where QBs are usually chosen. Some on here really liked the top QB prospect.


I don't understand why thats such a bad thing I guess. Just happened to be the Chiefs sucked in a year that didn't match up with that.

The Geno fans only have to take it until he gets drafted tonight....Then they can ridicule the franchise all they want when Fisher turns out to be an OK Tackle but the team stays ~.500 and never gets any better, while the people who are in love with Alex Smith will sit and cry in the corner

O.city 04-26-2013 09:52 AM

The "Genoites" blabbed and fired away all offseason. With last nights events, the anti geno guys were on full force. You knew it was coming.


However, if Geno does infact go on to be a successful QB somewhere other than KC, the "Genoites" will get their day in the sun.

Marcellus 04-26-2013 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9630895)
The "Genoites" blabbed and fired away all offseason. With last nights events, the anti geno guys were on full force. You knew it was coming.


However, if Geno does infact go on to be a successful QB somewhere other than KC, the "Genoites" will get their day in the sun.

The Sanchez Roller Coaster.

O.city 04-26-2013 09:55 AM

And I still argue that Sanchez would have been a better pick than Jackson and Cassel. Who knows though.

Sorter 04-26-2013 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9630904)
The Sanchez Roller Coaster.

Wouldn't it be funny if he turned in a productive year?

The roller coaster just keeps on the loops.

Saul Good 04-26-2013 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9630792)
Look, I wanted Geno too. I'm not a fan of Alex smith.

But geez, guys. You have one side treating Alex smith like a franchise qbs and another side screaming that all teams made a mistake in order to justify a reach of one full round.

There is maybe one guy on the board who thinks Alex Smith is a franchise QB, and he isn't even a Chiefs fan.

Easy 6 04-26-2013 09:58 AM

"geno is the white rg3"

LMAO

Marcellus 04-26-2013 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ponderception (Post 9630928)
Wouldn't it be funny if he turned in a productive year?

The roller coaster just keeps on the loops.

Oh yea it would be like 2010 all over again.

Sanchez turning it around after the buttfumble season would have to be one of the greatest QB turnarounds of all time though.

O.city 04-26-2013 09:59 AM

It is a bit funny that we've already deemed him a bust and shit player before he even gets drafted.


Oh well.

Marcellus 04-26-2013 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9630952)
It is a bit funny that we've already deemed him a bust and shit player before he even gets drafted.


Oh well.

I dont think anybody has done that.

cockeyes 04-26-2013 10:02 AM

He's not overrated. He's overrated on this website

The Franchise 04-26-2013 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9630957)
I dont think anybody has done that.

Have you been paying attention? They absolutely have.

Just Passin' By 04-26-2013 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9630866)
Wow, self-centered much? I don't have a crush on you, dipshit.

You weren't around here in the fall when htismaqe and I had to deal with all the dumbasses like BlackBob. It was ****ing awful.

It wasn't about being self-centered. It was about pointing out that you were full of shit with what you posted.

O.city 04-26-2013 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cockeyes (Post 9630961)
He's not overrated. He's overrated on this website

Of course he is.


Imagine that though. The pretty much top Qb in the class of the year the CHiefs have a chance to pick him is overvalued here.


Can't imagine why.

Marcellus 04-26-2013 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9630962)
Have you been paying attention? They absolutely have.

I guess I see a difference between Geno being a 1 overall or top 10 talent like some wanted to force down everyone's throat and the guy being a legitimate 2nd round talent.

The fact is it will be harder for him to be a bust being taken in the 2nd rather than 1.1 (obviously).

O.city 04-26-2013 10:06 AM

Geno was what he always was. A late first round talent.


Same as Barkley.

bevischief 04-26-2013 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9630485)
I'm actually more upset that we wasted those picks on Alex Smith now. We would have been in a position to get a quarterback today, be it Geno or Barkley. And we'll be in the same exact position a year from now, sitting in the second round, saying "wow, there's a really great player available but we gave this pick up for Alex ****ing Smith."

I agree.

Sorter 04-26-2013 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9630951)
Oh yea it would be like 2010 all over again.

Sanchez turning it around after the buttfumble season would have to be one of the greatest QB turnarounds of all time though.

Seriously hope it happens, and I detest the Sanchise. Would just be funny to me.


But only if he goes back to being bad later.

ToxSocks 04-26-2013 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9630976)
Geno was what he always was. A late first round talent.


Same as Barkley.

He's a talented QB that may not be ready to start day 1. For months Geno fans have been arguing to draft him and let him learn behind Alex for a season or two. Him sliding into the 2nd doesn't change that one bit. I still don't think the Chiefs will take him though, even if they do get a 2nd from Miami.

The Franchise 04-26-2013 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9630988)
He's a talented QB that may not be ready to start day 1. For months Geno fans have been arguing to draft him and let him learn behind Alex for a season or two. Him sliding into the 2nd doesn't change that one bit. I still don't think the Chiefs will take him though, even they do get a 2nd from Miami.

I don't think the Chiefs will be taking a QB in the first 4 rounds.....if at all this year.

O.city 04-26-2013 10:10 AM

If they can get back into the 2nd, thats the place to take one. It's where the best value is at, especially with 4 of the top 5 guys still there.


However, once they are all gone, meh, just wait till next year.

R8RFAN 04-26-2013 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImAWalkingCorpse (Post 9630593)
First round tackles don't win Superbowls. People who draft tackles number 1 overall do it to play it safe and go 8-8, 10-6.

the same people who don't understand that football is won in the trenches are the same ones who think a team should throw a bomb on every play.

ToxSocks 04-26-2013 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9630989)
I don't think the Chiefs will be taking a QB in the first 4 rounds.....if at all this year.

Probably not, but If the Qb's continue to slide, we could end up seeing a guy like Bray or Wilson get picked up in the 5th.

keg in kc 04-26-2013 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9630989)
I don't think the Chiefs will be taking a QB in the first 4 rounds.....if at all this year.

I agree. And since they don't have a 2nd round pick, that doesn't really bother me.

O.city 04-26-2013 10:12 AM

QB's will start flying off the board sometime. Like I said, once Geno, Barkley, Glennon and Bray are gone, jsut forget it.


No way I'd touch Nassib now, after he got Taylor Maysed

O.city 04-26-2013 10:13 AM

If you feel that strong about Alex Smith, you gotta go all in with him and try and get as much help for him on both sides as you can.

Worry about a developmental guy or another QB if you bottom out next year.

Pitt Gorilla 04-26-2013 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9630952)
It is a bit funny that we've already deemed him a bust and shit player before he even gets drafted.


Oh well.

I'm not sure you can call any of these QBs a bust. They all have talent and could all be very good. There was just no way in hades we were going to take Geno Smith 1.1.

Rain Man 04-26-2013 10:15 AM

If I was Geno, I would show up tomorrow in sweats, bring some Cheetos and pizza, and a little TV to watch the draft. I'd slouch back and put on a team's baseball hat every time their pick comes up. You could get a nation to love you by doing that.

ToxSocks 04-26-2013 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 9631004)
I'm not sure you can call any of these QBs a bust. They all have talent and could all be very good. There was just no way in hades we were going to take Geno Smith 1.1.

It could simply just mean that teams don't view these Qb's as day 1 starters, and that's fine. Everyone around here wants to act like all of these QB's are busts because they didn't go in round 1. Pretty funny.

Carlota69 04-26-2013 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 9631014)
If I was Geno, I would show up tomorrow in sweats, bring some Cheetos and pizza, and a little TV to watch the draft. I'd slouch back and put on a team's baseball hat every time their pick comes up. You could get a nation to love you by doing that.

:LOL:

opposition 04-26-2013 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9631017)
It could simply just mean that teams don't view these Qb's as day 1 starters, and that's fine. Everyone around here wants to act like all of these QB's are busts because they didn't go in round 1. Pretty funny.

I was called a racist mom raper because I said he isn't #1 pick worthy, and not even sure first round worthy. Just thought I'd come back and say boy there really are some genius folk around here. For 1 calling me a racist mom raper. And 2 being right.

I actually think Geno will be a "decent" QB somewhere, but a mom rapist because he isnt #1? C'mon!!!

bevischief 04-26-2013 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9630640)
That's where our philosophical difference lies. First I don't think Fisher's a stud (or Joeckel or Johnson). I think they're middling prospects available anywhere from 15 to 45 in every draft. Although that's really neither here nor there. Second, I think a 'mediocre,' as you put it, quarterback prospect has more draft value than a good line prospect, because the upside value potential is so much greater. Basically I think positional value is a real and key thing.

Obviously the league disagrees with me, but the league is also slow to change and extremely risk averse. Whereas I have nothing to lose if a player I like doesn't pan out.

And I think everyone is making the same mistake they always make at draft time, judging these picks immediately. You judge these picks in 4 or 5 years, as the players head into their second contracts. If Fisher's an all pro, it turns out that the pick was okay (I don't think I'll ever call it 'great', it's such a meh position to draft #1). If Joeckel or Johnson's a better tackle, then we picked the wrong horse. If Geno never sees the field, the league was right, and if he's a pro bowler, the league was wrong.

I agree. This was a safe pick for new leadership that is walking on pins and needles after what the SOC movement did. Another win now mode.

GoChargers 04-26-2013 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9630995)
the same people who don't understand that football is won in the trenches are the same ones who think a team should throw a bomb on every play.

The people who still think football is primarily won in the trenches are living in the 1960's. You can't win games with a historically bad O-line like the Chargers, Eagles, or Cardinals have, but a dominant O-line is a waste of money that needs to be spent on skill positions.

Pitt Gorilla 04-26-2013 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 9631014)
If I was Geno, I would show up tomorrow in sweats, bring some Cheetos and pizza, and a little TV to watch the draft. I'd slouch back and put on a team's baseball hat every time their pick comes up. You could get a nation to love you by doing that.

Include a case of Old Milwaukee and you're set.

The Franchise 04-26-2013 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by opposition (Post 9631037)
I was called a racist mom raper because I said he isn't #1 pick worthy, and not even sure first round worthy. Just thought I'd come back and say boy there really are some genius folk around here. For 1 calling me a racist mom raper. And 2 being right.

I actually think Geno will be a "decent" QB somewhere, but a mom rapist because he isnt #1? C'mon!!!

So you're a racist?

tredadda 04-26-2013 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9630895)
The "Genoites" blabbed and fired away all offseason. With last nights events, the anti geno guys were on full force. You knew it was coming.


However, if Geno does infact go on to be a successful QB somewhere other than KC, the "Genoites" will get their day in the sun.

If he doesn't will the "Genoites" admit they are wrong?

O.city 04-26-2013 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 9631051)
If he doesn't will the "Genoites" admit they are wrong?

Frankly even if he goes somewhere else and is successful, or goes on to suck, you can't say either they were wrong or right.


Circumstances are different in each place.

Easy 6 04-26-2013 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9630996)
Probably not, but If the Qb's continue to slide, we could end up seeing a guy like Bray or Wilson get picked up in the 5th.

I'd be cool with Brays raw talent at five.

Marcellus 04-26-2013 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9631017)
It could simply just mean that teams don't view these Qb's as day 1 starters, and that's fine. Everyone around here wants to act like all of these QB's are busts because they didn't go in round 1. Pretty funny.

Which is exactly why they traded for Alex Smith rather than wasting the next 2 years of JC, Bowe, DJ, and Hali who are all in their prime or heading down the backside of their prime.

If you use logic, its not that difficult to understand.

tredadda 04-26-2013 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9631017)
It could simply just mean that teams don't view these Qb's as day 1 starters, and that's fine. Everyone around here wants to act like all of these QB's are busts because they didn't go in round 1. Pretty funny.

Well so far Manuel has been labeled a reach and a bust in the making while pre-draft Geno was a sure fire stud.

opposition 04-26-2013 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9631049)
So you're a racist?

:LOL: Nooooo nooo noo no.

ToxSocks 04-26-2013 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 9631051)
If he doesn't will the "Genoites" admit they are wrong?

No, because once again, it's not about Geno. It's about the philosophy of developing your own QB. Attacks on Geno Smith are just a deflection for the real issue at hand; the Chiefs are allergic to developing their own QB and so is their fan base.

And you know what? Next year will be a repeat of this year, which was a repeat of last year, which was a repeat of the year before that. The only difference, you'll call us "Bridgwaterites" instead of "Genoites".

Marcellus 04-26-2013 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9631055)
Frankly even if he goes somewhere else and is successful, or goes on to suck, you can't say either they were wrong or right.


Circumstances are different in each place.

That's a load of crap. A franchise QB will succeed no matter where they go, that the point of a franchise QB. "Franchise".

tredadda 04-26-2013 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9631055)
Frankly even if he goes somewhere else and is successful, or goes on to suck, you can't say either they were wrong or right.


Circumstances are different in each place.

But if he succeeds you know as well as I do the "Genoites" will be the first with the "I told you so" posts regardless of how he might have performed here (you know different circumstances). Will they openly eat crow if he busts regardless of circumstances?

ToxSocks 04-26-2013 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 9631061)
Well so far Manuel has been labeled a reach and a bust in the making while pre-draft Geno was a sure fire stud.

I don't know if Manuel will be a bust or not, but i do know that Buffalo had the balls to make a move. They understand that you don't win in the NFL with out a Franchise QB.

QB's are crap shoots. Collect them until you find "the one".

Props to Buffalo for at least taking a chance at solving an issue that's plagued them since Jim Kelly.

The Rick 04-26-2013 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9630952)
It is a bit funny that we've already deemed him a bust and shit player before he even gets drafted.


Oh well.

On that note...

It is a bit funny that we've already deemed the Alex Smith trade a bust before he even plays a down for Andy Reid.

Oh well.

The Rick 04-26-2013 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9631055)
Frankly even if he goes somewhere else and is successful, or goes on to suck, you can't say either they were wrong or right.


Circumstances are different in each place.

The same could be said for Alex Smith in KC playing for Andy Reid. Circumstances are different in each place.

keg in kc 04-26-2013 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Rick (Post 9631080)
On that note...

It is a bit funny that we've already deemed the Alex Smith trade a bust before he even plays a down for Andy Reid.

Oh well.

So we're supposed to disregard his other 7 years in the league? Okay then.

Marcellus 04-26-2013 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9631066)
No, because once again, it's not about Geno. It's about the philosophy of developing your own QB. Attacks on Geno Smith are just a deflection for the real issue at hand; the Chiefs are allergic to developing their own QB and so is their fan base.

And you know what? Next year will be a repeat of this year, which was a repeat of last year, which was a repeat of the year before that. The only difference, you'll call us "Bridgwaterites" instead of "Genoites".

So we should have drafted Geno at 1.1 just to say we tried.

You guys and your inability to understand that THIS draft has nothing to do with the last 30 are hilarious.

If Reid and Dorsey continue to ignore the QB position then all your hand wringing and moaning will be correct. Fact is the evidence of 1 draft, one round of one draft, doesn't support your whining ass theory.

You guys talk like this would have happened if we had last years #1 pick with that draft class. You continue to look dumber and dumber and dumber making the same statements over and over after the NFL just told you there aren't likely any franchise QB's in this draft.

Frosty 04-26-2013 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Rick (Post 9631080)
On that note...

It is a bit funny that we've already deemed the Alex Smith trade a bust before he even plays a down for Andy Reid.

Oh well.

Except we have a body of work in the NFL to look at that points to Smith's ceiling is an injury prone game manager.

Marcellus 04-26-2013 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9631086)
So we're supposed to disregard his other 7 years in the league? Okay then.

What you are saying is you want to disregard his last 28 games and only look at his first 5 years.

Bewbies 04-26-2013 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9631086)
So we're supposed to disregard his other 7 years in the league? Okay then.

Yes. He turned top 5 the day he was traded.

tredadda 04-26-2013 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9631066)
No, because once again, it's not about Geno. It's about the philosophy of developing your own QB. Attacks on Geno Smith are just a deflection for the real issue at hand; the Chiefs are allergic to developing their own QB and so is their fan base.

And you know what? Next year will be a repeat of this year, which was a repeat of last year, which was a repeat of the year before that. The only difference, you'll call us "Bridgwaterites" instead of "Genoites".

Bullshit.

1. The fanbase here has already talked about Buffalo taking Manuel in the first calling him a reach even though Buffalo tried. They were critical of the pick because Buffalo should have taken Geno whom some on here are madly in love with. The fact that EVERYONE in the first round passed on him is not relevant.

2. Had the Chiefs taken Barkley or Nassib or Manuel at 1.1 most on here would have been livid even though they took a chance on a QB in the first (which is apparently what everyone wanted). Bottom line it was Geno or bust.

3. The acolytes of the Cult of Geno on here would be ecstatic if somehow we traded Albert for pick #54 and landed Geno even though we failed to draft a 1st round QB.

This is all about drafting Geno and Geno alone in round 1. Anything else is unacceptable.

Bowser 04-26-2013 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Rick (Post 9631080)
On that note...

It is a bit funny that we've already deemed the Alex Smith trade a bust before he even plays a down for Andy Reid.

Oh well.

I would have felt much better about his prospects as a QB going forward with us had Harbaugh followed him here.

Is he going to be the QB of the last year and a half, or will he be the guy he was the first six years of his career?

tredadda 04-26-2013 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9631077)
I don't know if Manuel will be a bust or not, but i do know that Buffalo had the balls to make a move. They understand that you don't win in the NFL with out a Franchise QB.

QB's are crap shoots. Collect them until you find "the one".

Props to Buffalo for at least taking a chance at solving an issue that's plagued them since Jim Kelly.

I will give you credit for not trashing Buffalo at least. You are an exception right now.

opposition 04-26-2013 10:35 AM

I can't believe Alex Smith is better than Geno. Who would've thought? Oh.. Duh. 32 other NFL GENERAL MANAGERS.

But we have had 7 years to diagnose Alex, but General managers don't know anything.

ndws 04-26-2013 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 9630259)
Exactly. I can't tell you how many rude CP Geno loving IDIOTS neg repped me for having the opinion that Geno would not be the first QB taken and that KC should pass on him at all costs and draft another QB if they were to draft one.

I got neg repped too...didn't sleep that night at all either. Oh well, Vageno will find a home somewhere. He's no Casey Printers, right?

ToxSocks 04-26-2013 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9631092)
So we should have drafted Geno at 1.1 just to say we tried.

You guys and your inability to understand that THIS draft has nothing to do with the last 30 are hilarious.

If Reid and Dorsey continue to ignore the QB position then all your hand wringing and moaning will be correct. Fact is the evidence of 1 draft, one round of one draft, doesn't support your whining ass theory.

You guys talk like this would have happened if we had last years #1 pick with that draft class. You continue to look dumber and dumber and dumber making the same statements over and over after the NFL just told you there aren't likely any franchise QB's in this draft.


I dont care where he is drafted. Hell, i don't even care if it's Geno Smith. I don't know how many times i have to say that for you people to get it.

And the NFL hasn't told anyone anything. Just because the QB didn't go in round one and isn't considered a day 1 starter all of a sudden means that they can't develop into one? Kaep, Wilson and Brees say otherwise.

Marcellus 04-26-2013 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9631117)
I dont care where he is drafted. Hell, i don't even care if it's Geno Smith. I don't know how many times i have to say that for you people to get it.

And the NFL hasn't told anyone anything. Just because the QB didn't go in round one and isn't considered a day 1 starter all of a sudden means that they can't develop into one? Kaep, Wilson and Brees say otherwise.

Alright lets roll the dice not sign Alex Smith and waste another 2 years of our skill players careers.

Saul Good 04-26-2013 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 9631100)
Bullshit.

1. The fanbase here has already talked about Buffalo taking Manuel in the first calling him a reach even though Buffalo tried. They were critical of the pick because Buffalo should have taken Geno whom some on here are madly in love with. The fact that EVERYONE in the first round passed on him is not relevant.

2. Had the Chiefs taken Barkley or Nassib or Manuel at 1.1 most on here would have been livid even though they took a chance on a QB in the first (which is apparently what everyone wanted). Bottom line it was Geno or bust.

3. The acolytes of the Cult of Geno on here would be ecstatic if somehow we traded Albert for pick #54 and landed Geno even though we failed to draft a 1st round QB.

This is all about drafting Geno and Geno alone in round 1. Anything else is unacceptable.

Great post...and I want Geno. I'm just not militant about it.

keg in kc 04-26-2013 10:40 AM

Not many who wanted Geno at 1 would have batted an eyelash at Barkley at 1. That's been part of the discussion for months.

opposition 04-26-2013 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9631117)
I dont care where he is drafted. Hell, i don't even care if it's Geno Smith. I don't know how many times i have to say that for you people to get it.

And the NFL hasn't told anyone anything. Just because the QB didn't go in round one and isn't considered a day 1 starter all of a sudden means that they can't develop into one? Kaep, Wilson and Brees say otherwise.

I think the point is Geno was not worth a #1 pick and many wanted him with that pick.

GoChargers 04-26-2013 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by opposition (Post 9631109)
I can't believe Alex Smith is better than Geno. Who would've thought? Oh.. Duh. 32 other NFL GENERAL MANAGERS.

But we have had 7 years to diagnose Alex, but General managers don't know anything.

Oh really? Then explain why the Niners' GM dumped Alex Smith ASAP this offseason. One of the league's smartest front offices couldn't wait to get rid of him.

ToxSocks 04-26-2013 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 9631100)
Bullshit.

1. The fanbase here has already talked about Buffalo taking Manuel in the first calling him a reach even though Buffalo tried. They were critical of the pick because Buffalo should have taken Geno whom some on here are madly in love with. The fact that EVERYONE in the first round passed on him is not relevant.

2. Had the Chiefs taken Barkley or Nassib or Manuel at 1.1 most on here would have been livid even though they took a chance on a QB in the first (which is apparently what everyone wanted). Bottom line it was Geno or bust.

3. The acolytes of the Cult of Geno on here would be ecstatic if somehow we traded Albert for pick #54 and landed Geno even though we failed to draft a 1st round QB.

This is all about drafting Geno and Geno alone in round 1. Anything else is unacceptable.

Bullshit. People latched onto Geno's nuts because he's been widely considered the top QB available. That's it.

You're trying to lump years and years of a culture that's been brewing on CP in one offseason. These "Genoites" didn't just randomly form an opinion because of Geno Smith. If you think that, then you haven't been paying attention to Chiefsplanet over the last 5 years.

HemiEd 04-26-2013 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9630482)
And Hootie can **** straight off. He rode Geno dick until it became obvious that we weren't taking him.....then Geno was worthless. I don't trust Hootie's evaluation on anyone.

Not even Tony Romo? Peyton Manning?

O.city 04-26-2013 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9631121)
Alright lets roll the dice not sign Alex Smith and waste another 2 years of our skill players careers.

So lets get it out there then, you do infact think Alex Smith is good enough to not waste the next 2 years of our skill players careers by taking them deep into th eplayoffs?

ToxSocks 04-26-2013 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9631126)
Not many who wanted Geno at 1 would have batted an eyelash at Barkley at 1. That's been part of the discussion for months.

These guys want to MAKE it argument. There may have been 2-3 guys that would've bitched about Barkley at one.

Marcellus 04-26-2013 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChargers (Post 9631130)
Oh really? Then explain why the Niners' GM dumped Alex Smith ASAP this offseason. One of the league's smartest front offices couldn't wait to get rid of him.

Because no one here is arguing Alex is better than CK and you dont pay your back up QB $7MM+ a year when you can get a high2nd round pick for him, are you brainless?

Rain Man 04-26-2013 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 9631048)
Include a case of Old Milwaukee and you're set.

Right before every pick was announced, I would stand up and straighten out my sweatshirt and look toward the stage. I might even walk up and stand at the edge of it, staring at Goodell, or perhaps stay at my table but get down in a sprinter's starting stance.

Seriously, he is missing a golden opportunity to become a cultural phenomenon. Everyone loves people who can laugh in the face of misfortune. If he goes home, he becomes a crybaby. He should embrace what's happening like the Mr. Irrelevant players do.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.