No, they can't apparently.


Edit: Looks like one of them finally found the right button. LMAO

I'm not left at all. What the hell is he talking about?

LMAO

Yeah. I might be able too. I'm taking it slow, though. Gonna settle in and try and play it straight for a while.

The puppies actually have a calming effect on me. I may just keep them.

LOVE THAT AVATAR!

Well, somebody changed his name back. I assumed it was you.

There you are. Now you need the angry Bo pic in your avatar. I can't remember the last time you had your original name. It wasn't even funny. What was funny was the long one. Double bacon cheeseburger or something. That was funny.

I always liked the Schneider avatar.

Nope. I'm actually in the middle of playing Final Fantasy VIII. Stopping every few minutes to cruise this thread and the woodworking thread.

Goddamnit I finally have my real name back after several years, don't be giving these n00b mods any ideas.

Wait, that wasn't calm at all. Look at the puppies! Cute puppies!

Calm down, n00b. Now we need Skip to come back lol that would be real funny.

Has anyone seen Donger lately?

He still bumps around in DC pretty regularly. Not sure why he doesn't come in the lounge anymore.

Hmm..

So who are the mods these days? I don't feel like reading through all of these threads.

All you gotta do is look at the bottom of the forum in red. It's not like the old days when they weren't red and you didn't even know who they were.

I don't think we have any. It's ****ing anarchy around here.


Or they're listed at the bottom of the front page.

He can't see them on his Garmin Vivomove

I don't think starting a new account is or was ever against the tos. People had started over or been permitted to start over in the past. I think that using multiple at the same time or coming back after having been banned was against the tos. Otherwise a silly trolling project was often permitted. But now you'd get banned or disabled or MUed without any warning and have no method of redress which is kind of lame. Esp when the site could use the traffic anyway.

this isnt true.

ROFL

So, who's mult are you?

In men?

Who the hell is Bugeater?

Some mult of that BaconEater guy, I'm betting. Hold on, I'll go flush the mult turd.....

This place lost its burst when Guru left. Remember when that guy would be posting aaaaaaaaallllllll night long?

I remember seeing the name but didn't see any quality in his posts.

"But now you'd get banned or disabled or MUed without any warning and have no method of redress which is kind of lame."

Might not be true now, but in the past is what standard MO for a mod to do this then hide or ignore...

I dont think this group will be that way. I have met a few of them (via in person or phone) and they seem to be very honest and level folks.

Banish reerun and mark him with the sign of the beast...The Scarlet cartoon chicken

Could you imagine if htismaqe was here? He yelled at GoChiefs for slowing down the server lol and his strict "you must be active with football posts in the lounge or be banned". He was only around during the day though, and most of the fun back in the day was at night lol

.

Crazycoffee and the night threads. Those were the days.

Was he banned? I thought he seemed to be doing better?

He lost it at some point and was put on mu by the looks of things.

hey, people are complicated...

i still love people even when i disagree with them, even when they do something stupid...\

it was wrong for you to be banned in the first place, totally wrong...

but i loves me some man of steel even though he's flawed, like most of us...

btw, i thought it was phobes who slammed the ban on you...

either way, lots of us are berry berry glad you are back! :toast:

ahhhh...

One was the puppet of the other, but it doesn't matter now. Both of the one who sucks the peniss are gone, and here I am. :thumb:

yeah that Guru guy sucks.

yeah back in the day when you were a good poster.:rolleyes:

Ut-oh. Somebody has sand in their Super Duper Decoder Ring.

I was banned because I posted a tweet from Clay, it was right after that I was placed on MU with no reasoning. Clay is back and I'm still on the MU? Not cool.

Inmem Giveaways > Clay GayDays

So are you still on MU? If yes then post a reply back in like 20 minutes.

Perhaps the new regime could give him a fresh start.

Yeah, I am still on MU. Bob Dole couldn't handle being mod. He did not take criticism very well when it came to his precious golden boy Smith. Check out my previous posts and connect the dots. Nothing I did was worthy of being MU'd.

The new mods should evaluate my previous incident.

Seconded

Clay's gay days were great.

I don't think I'm overstepping boundaries by saying that a number of previously banned members are going to be discussed after some other things are worked out.

That being said, judging from your post, I don't guess Inmen was posting much back when you were still around.

Outside of the food threads, he's not a very enjoyable poster.

Dumb. And childish.

Yeah they were.

Wait, so who all is back?

Frazod is back!

Black Bob is back, and acting fairly normal, although I did get a rep from him that said, "**** off McFly, you WILL pay." Not sure why.

And Clay seems to be back as spider2ybanana

I don't remember much about him, frankly. Lots of posters here and I was gone for a long time. I certainly remember the ones I strongly disliked, though, and he's not on that list.

If you say he's got issues, however, I won't argue with you.

Free this glorious Patriot. He has done his part for King and Country.

Eh, I'm in favor of giving almost everyone a clean slate, then our new mods can determine what to do with them based on how they handle it.

I'll tell you one thing, once you've been stuck on that ****ing MU list, you tend to develop sympathy for anyone else who's on it.

Well, almost anyone else. :)

I think this is how it should be.

And I couldn't disagree more.

There's only one person that's been banned in the entire history of Chiefsplanet that came back and changed their M.O. - TimBone.

Claynus, Hootie, InMem, Rudy, DarthCarlSatan/SweetDaddyHate/RoR/Dagnabit have all been exactly the same, each and every time.

It would be a complete waste of the moderators time to unleash all of the banned forum members on the Lounge.

Awwwwww puppy. I chang.....BAN HIM!!

Just a suggestion since its the purpose of the thread.

i was coming here to post this exact same thing.

And my suggestion is that the banned stay banned

:D

Bring back inmen and have a vote to MU a turd every week.

touche'
:toast:

he's had a clean slate multiple times and he has burnt every mod thats gone to bat for him.

but we are going to discuss them all at length i'm sure.

Lucky for me you're not in charge, I guess. :)

i personally dont much believe in rehabilitation

mistakes can happen, but habitual behavior is what it is

let the crazies back in, and that is just what you'll get

Clay is Exhibit A:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=614

Is that Exhibit A illustrating Exhibit B?

What's the point sir?

He's a card toting member of the ACLU. Don't mind him.

thirded

Oh, it's Claynus alright.

And he's back to his same old schtick, along with being too big of a ****ing pussy to repeat what he says in neg rep notes to the forum.

He's a duplicitous, two faced ****.

So let me get this straight, every time I was banned it was for a legit reason? Why did we get new mods again if they were always right? There has been multiple times I was placed on MU for no reason. One little negative comment about the Chiefs I was gone.

I know Tim and I don't see eye to eye, but I'm sure glad he's a mod and not that douchebag Bob Dole.

HOW IN THE **** ARE YOU POSTING SO MUCH FROM MU??

I honestly don't know the history of all of your bannings and MUs. I just remember you being insufferable at times. You know it's not one little negative comment about the Chiefs that does it. You're lying to yourself, there. Plenty of people here make negative comments about the Chiefs (including myself) and get by just fine. It's the repetitive spamming that does it. You made your feelings about Smith clear. Is it necessary to do it in nearly every thread? Even those threads not concerning Alex Smith?

As I mentioned though, there are going to be discussions about a number of the currently banned/MU'ed members. I can promise you that, for my part, I will discuss you fairly, regardless of whether we butted heads or not.

Inmen be honest dude. You made waaaaay more than one post. You got warned and then still went off like a broken record. That's silly.

Basically this.

For example:

Random Thread about about defense,

Inmen: Wtf does it matter how good the defense is? We're going nowhere with Smith. He sucks.

And that might even be fine if you dod it once or twice, but it was all the time. It gets old.

I took 30 minutes to post that lol. I respect that bro, hopefully we can get something worked out. This will be my last post for today, MU is ****ing frustrating lol.

The new concept for the mod team (and related committee) is that there will be a lot more discussion of philosophy rather than individuals just going for it all the time. The advantage is that hopefully things will be clearer and more consistent. The disadvantage is that the wheels of progress turn more slowly.

Priority 1 right now is working out the details of what may become a place where people go in lieu of banning (though obvious rule infractions will still result in actual bans). Once that's worked out, there will likely be a discussion about those who are currently banned but might be OK to bring back in such a space.

Stay tuned.

There should be a Clay v. Tiger Forum that the two of them can argue about Alex Smith for eternity.

I believe the hope is that the Romper Room will contain a lot of that stuff.