ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Are you in favor of releasing Tyreek Hill? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=322570)

htismaqe 05-03-2019 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 14250253)
Lawyers going to lawyer and didn't change a thing.

The text conversation has changed my viewpoint quite a bit. I'm human, perhaps it's because I want to believe.

This is about where I'm at.

For all of the people "waiting for facts", so many seem to be only waiting for facts that clear Hill. These text messages certainly look better for Tyreek but until they're independently verified, they really don't mean anything. They're not anymore concrete than the phone recording, the DA not pressing charges, or any of the rest of it. So why are all these "patient" people already declaring him innocent?

As for me, I certainly want him to be innocent. I want to see him play for the Chiefs again. I really don't want to see him play for someone else. But if we're going to wait for all of the fact to emerge, we have to be honest and wait for ALL of the fact to emerge.

Hammock Parties 05-03-2019 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14250270)
These text messages certainly look better for Tyreek but until they're independently verified, they really don't mean anything.

They WERE.

By an INDEPENDENT computer forensics company.

The law firm didn't give it to their nerd in the back server room.

Hammock Parties 05-03-2019 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14250270)
So why are all these "patient" people already declaring him innocent?

Because this evidence is ironclad and flies in the face of every piece of bullshit that the media tried to trump up as TYREEK HILL, WORST HUMAN TO WALK THE EARTH, HITLER IN PADS.

Prison Bitch 05-03-2019 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 14250233)
Hamas used to be the most un-PC person on this board. Sadly, too many years at college, studying to be faculty I presume, has shifted his outlook on things quite a bit. But hey, someone has to take crazy, redheaded, former professor's spot at Mizzou, amirite?!

Spot on^


I used to laugh at his shit. Now it’s full-on SJW and screaming at people he seems to be bad people. It’s sad.

htismaqe 05-03-2019 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14250273)
They WERE.

By an INDEPENDENT computer forensics company.

The law firm didn't give it to their nerd in the back server room.

A company paid by the defense to analyze forensics data isn't independent. That's not how things work, dude.

Hammock Parties 05-03-2019 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14250283)
A company paid by the defense to analyze forensics data isn't independent. That's not how things work, dude.

C'mon, man. You really think these kind of lawyers would pay someone to fake that kind of data? It wouldn't hold up in court AT ALL.

Crystal and the media went off all half-cocked here and the pros hit a hanging curveball out of the park.

This is already over in my mind.

htismaqe 05-03-2019 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14250292)
C'mon, man. You really think these kind of lawyers would pay someone to fake that kind of data? It wouldn't hold up in court AT ALL.

Crystal and the media went off all half-cocked here and the pros hit a hanging curveball out of the park.

This is already over in my mind.

It's not about faking data. It's that even forensic evidence presented in a court of law is subject to interpretation and only as good as the sway it has on the jury.

How is that in nearly EVERY case where forensic evidence is key, BOTH sides have forensic "experts" and they always come to different conclusions?

It's because they aren't paid to be objective, they're paid to get an acquittal (or a conviction).

As for this being over, if the texts are real and true, as you believe they are, then Tyreek is probably in trouble for not handing them over before.

We all WANT this to be over. It isn't over and it probably won't be for a while yet, unfortunately.

Hammock Parties 05-03-2019 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14250305)
It's not about faking data. It's that even forensic evidence presented in a court of law is subject to interpretation and only as good as the sway it has on the jury.

This isn't going to court. ROFL

Iczer 05-03-2019 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14250270)
This is about where I'm at.

For all of the people "waiting for facts", so many seem to be only waiting for facts that clear Hill. These text messages certainly look better for Tyreek but until they're independently verified, they really don't mean anything. They're not anymore concrete than the phone recording, the DA not pressing charges, or any of the rest of it. So why are all these "patient" people already declaring him innocent?

As for me, I certainly want him to be innocent. I want to see him play for the Chiefs again. I really don't want to see him play for someone else. But if we're going to wait for all of the fact to emerge, we have to be honest and wait for ALL of the fact to emerge.

Only thing is all of the "facts" were not out there before everyone was crucifying Hill. I'm not waiting for facts to clear Hill, I'm waiting for facts to PROVE SOMETHING.

This is what I know, please correct me if I'm wrong.

Hill was not home when he saw on his camera that his fiance was passed out with his kid running around.

The broken arm was investigated and determined that it was caused by an accident and NOT by abuse.

Text messages have been authenticated as real(I'm sure we'll see more into this).

Iczer 05-03-2019 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14250305)
It's not about faking data. It's that even forensic evidence presented in a court of law is subject to interpretation and only as good as the sway it has on the jury.

How is that in nearly EVERY case where forensic evidence is key, BOTH sides have forensic "experts" and they always come to different conclusions?

It's because they aren't paid to be objective, they're paid to get an acquittal (or a conviction).

As for this being over, if the texts are real and true, as you believe they are, then Tyreek is probably in trouble for not handing them over before.

We all WANT this to be over. It isn't over and it probably won't be for a while yet, unfortunately.

We're not in Hill's situation. Did Hill or his fiance think it'd get this far? Have they fallen out since this went down? Did he realize she was recording conversations in a public area where he most likely just wanted to end it so it didn't cause a scene? Is he now releasing more evidence because it was not previously needed and now is trying to clear his name since everyone is characterizing him as some child abuser?

htismaqe 05-03-2019 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iczer (Post 14250322)
We're not in Hill's situation. Did Hill or his fiance think it'd get this far? Have they fallen out since this went down? Did he realize she was recording conversations in a public area where he most likely just wanted to end it so it didn't cause a scene? Is he now releasing more evidence because it was not previously needed and now is trying to clear his name since everyone is characterizing him as some child abuser?

When your subject of interest in a criminal investigation, ALL evidence is relevant. There is no such thing as "well, I'm going to hold onto it because it isn't needed."

That's universal. I don't have to be in Hill's situation to know you don't withhold information from law enforcement during an active investigation.

htismaqe 05-03-2019 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iczer (Post 14250315)
Only thing is all of the "facts" were not out there before everyone was crucifying Hill. I'm not waiting for facts to clear Hill, I'm waiting for facts to PROVE SOMETHING.

This is what I know, please correct me if I'm wrong.

Hill was not home when he saw on his camera that his fiance was passed out with his kid running around.

The broken arm was investigated and determined that it was caused by an accident and NOT by abuse.

Text messages have been authenticated as real(I'm sure we'll see more into this).

The text messages were authenticated by a forensics expert hired by Hill's lawyers. You and I may want to believe they are true but it doesn't matter what we think. You can be sure others will weigh in on them. Until the DA or similar 2nd party comes out and agrees with the authentication, they're not authentic. It doesn't work that way.

Iczer 05-03-2019 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14250329)
When your subject of interest in a criminal investigation, ALL evidence is relevant. There is no such thing as "well, I'm going to hold onto it because it isn't needed."

That's universal. I don't have to be in Hill's situation to know you don't withhold information from law enforcement during an active investigation.

You're making assumptions that the investigators asked all the right questions and insinuating he purposely withheld evidence. Do you have anything to back this up? Could it not be his team is still working with him to find more evidence due to the case rumored to be re-opened? His name being further dragged in the dirt and ultimately taking away what could have been a massive contract

htismaqe 05-03-2019 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14250314)
This isn't going to court. ROFL

It absolutely will go to civil court. In fact, it's already IN family court.

There's more to this than criminal allegations.

Iczer 05-03-2019 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14250332)
The text messages were authenticated by a forensics expert hired by Hill's lawyers. You and I may want to believe they are true but it doesn't matter what we think. You can be sure others will weigh in on them. Until the DA or similar 2nd party comes out and agrees with the authentication, they're not authentic. It doesn't work that way.

I agree, if he truly has months worth of texts like they say. It should be pretty easy to authenticate them based on previous conversations, how they talk, etc.

htismaqe 05-03-2019 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iczer (Post 14250333)
You're making assumptions that the investigators asked all the right questions and insinuating he purposely withheld evidence. Do you have anything to back this up? Could it not be his team is still working with him to find more evidence due to the case rumored to be re-opened?

I've said all along that I'm making that assumption. That's why I've used words like "could" and "possibly".

The only difference between my assumption and the people assuming he's innocent is that I actually admit the following:

ALL of it is assumption. We literally don't know anything. Still.

Iczer 05-03-2019 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14250343)
I've said all along that I'm making that assumption. That's why I've used words like "could" and "possibly".

The only difference between my assumption and the people assuming he's innocent is that I actually admit the following:

ALL of it is assumption. We literally don't know anything. Still.

I disagree, there are plenty of facts about this case that if known from the beginning could have changed public perception of Hill. Media sensationalizing headlines about a passed out women, etc.

Hill was not present at home when she was passed out.

The broken arm was deemed an accident and not by abuse.

Two big facts there.

GloryDayz 05-03-2019 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14250283)
A company paid by the defense to analyze forensics data isn't independent. That's not how things work, dude.

^^^ Says this stupid shit, but has the noose tied for Tyreek because of unverified audio tapes manufactured by the crazy bitch ^^^

LMAO

htismaqe 05-03-2019 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 14250399)
^^^ Says this stupid shit, but has the noose tied for Tyreek because of unverified audio tapes manufactured by the crazy bitch ^^^

LMAO

False.

Hammock Parties 05-03-2019 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iczer (Post 14250364)
Media sensationalizing headlines about a passed out women, etc.

Hill was not present at home when she was passed out.

Crystal passed out? TYREEK MUST HAVE DONE IT!!!!

And most people fell for that shit. Myself included.

**** 'em.

htismaqe 05-03-2019 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14250411)
Crystal passed out? TYREEK MUST HAVE DONE IT!!!!

And most people fell for that shit. Myself included.

**** 'em.

Honestly, I've been logged in so off and on the past few months, I'm not even sure what "passing out" incident you guys are talking about. :D

GloryDayz 05-03-2019 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14250404)
False.

:spock:

Mecca 05-03-2019 10:05 AM

It could be worse...friend of mine wants him to hang so bad he's basically saying there aren't any text messages and the lawyer is lying because "that text is just typed" then he cites some lawyer that was on 610.

Hammock Parties 05-03-2019 10:14 AM

This is a witch hunt.

Tyreek is Trump, the broken arm is Russian collusion, him being a dick on tape is obstruction of justice.

And it's all bullshit.

htismaqe 05-03-2019 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 14250433)
:spock:

I never fitted Hill for noose. The only thing I said that comes even remotely close is that I thought he did it and hoped the Chiefs cut him if he did.

All along, my commentary has been more about the NFL and their ability to punish him, whether he committed a crime or not.

And that is still pretty likely to happen, BTW. Goodell is a power hungry jerk.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-03-2019 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14250482)
This is a witch hunt.

Tyreek is Trump, the broken arm is Russian collusion, him being a dick on tape is obstruction of justice.

And it's all bullshit.

Finally what I’ve wanted to say but didn’t want to bring DC into this :clap:

Chiefaholic 05-03-2019 12:05 PM

Innocent until PROVEN guilty. The media and quite a few fans need to put away their pitchforks and torches until there's a legitimate legal conviction. And NO, I don't think a parent should get jail time for spanking a kids ass. That's half the problem with kids of this generation. There was no serious repercussion for wrong doings and kids will push you as far as they can to see what they can get by with.

Jimmya 05-03-2019 12:07 PM

Down here in Texas, elementary & primary schools still use a wooden paddle. Imagine the outrage!

Chiefaholic 05-03-2019 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 14250755)
Down here in Texas, elementary & primary schools still use a wooden paddle. Imagine the outrage!

I had my ass paddled a few times, and I knew where the line was before there was a scolding harsher than "time out" that occurred. And the "punch to the chest", despite being wrong, is more than likely dramatized by the child's mother. Common damn sense tells you that Hill didn't outright punch the child. Both of my parents would have been burned at the stake if people here were judge and jury. I love both of them and have and will do anything they need. They taught me morals, work ethics, and took us to church to keep our priorities right.

GloryDayz 05-03-2019 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14250498)
I never fitted Hill for noose. The only thing I said that comes even remotely close is that I thought he did it and hoped the Chiefs cut him if he did.

All along, my commentary has been more about the NFL and their ability to punish him, whether he committed a crime or not.

And that is still pretty likely to happen, BTW. Goodell is a power hungry jerk.

WE GOOD..

GloryDayz 05-03-2019 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14250482)
This is a witch hunt.

Tyreek is Trump, the broken arm is Russian collusion, him being a dick on tape is obstruction of justice.

And it's all bullshit.

Sadly, yes...

synthesis2 05-03-2019 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14250077)
You do realize for this to be a bowl team we kinda need him right now?

Look I'm not saying if he is isn't charged to not play him this year, sure go ahead and play him and try to make and win the superbowl, that's all good by me.

My take is that drama follows this guy in a bad way.

I'm for tagging him at the end of the season and trading him for a 1st round pick, if he keeps his nose clean someone won't be able to resist. If we walk away with a 1st then I'm good.

Pasta Little Brioni 05-03-2019 09:53 PM

There is nothing to warrant a suspension, much less to cut him.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-04-2019 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synthesis2 (Post 14251251)
Look I'm not saying if he is isn't charged to not play him this year, sure go ahead and play him and try to make and win the superbowl, that's all good by me.

My take is that drama follows this guy in a bad way.

I'm for tagging him at the end of the season and trading him for a 1st round pick, if he keeps his nose clean someone won't be able to resist. If we walk away with a 1st then I'm good.

I'm not trading our Jerry Rice for 5 first round picks. Some partnerships can not be priced.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-04-2019 01:00 AM

Tyreek will be in the HOF someday. Why people want to trade him I will never understand

GloryDayz 05-04-2019 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 14251637)
There is nothing to warrant a suspension, much less to cut him.

Maybe a little suspicion, but not enough to halt our progress toward a Super Bowl with him helping as a member of our team.

Pitt Gorilla 05-09-2019 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14250498)
I never fitted Hill for noose. The only thing I said that comes even remotely close is that I thought he did it and hoped the Chiefs cut him if he did.

All along, my commentary has been more about the NFL and their ability to punish him, whether he committed a crime or not.

And that is still pretty likely to happen, BTW. Goodell is a power hungry jerk.

You literally voted that you are in favor of releasing him. I still don't understand this line of thinking, outside of overly-emotional petulance.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-09-2019 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 14261483)
You literally voted that you are in favor of releasing him. I still don't understand this line of thinking, outside of overly-emotional petulance.

Hear hear!

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-09-2019 08:59 PM

The Shameful 236.

Brand them and march them to the sea.

WhiteWhale 05-09-2019 09:22 PM

Nah, **** that.

KC releases Hill

The media would respond with "Oh, what a move by the chiefs, taking a stand. Good for them!"

Another team signs Tyreek Hill later and and it's all:

"Well, what a smart move to get a great player for so cheap. Everyone deserves second chances!"

Yeah, I already watched the Kareem Hunt thing play out, and I think he's THE best running back in the NFL. No more shedding great players for nothing if they're just going to play elsewhere. I don't want to play AGAINST Tyreek Hill. **** THAT. Leave it to the Patriots to sign him, rebrand him as a hall of famer, and everyone to just ****ing ignore all the negative shit.

Shiver Me Timbers 05-09-2019 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLO (Post 14229606)
Are you in favor of Freeing the Cheetah?

NO!!

Mrs Piggy and KKK Kietzman can get a room with a view of riot night at Worlds of Fun

Carry on.........

GloryDayz 05-09-2019 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shiver Me Timbers (Post 14261571)
NO!!

Mrs Piggy and KKK Kietzman can get a room with a view of riot night at Worlds of Fun

Carry on.........

Kietzman has no dick or balls, no need for a room.

Shiver Me Timbers 05-09-2019 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 14261576)
Kietzman has no dick or balls, no need for a room.

True to that.
I try to listen to 810 on the internet. the afternoon kkk programing drives me bat shit crayz.

Pitt Gorilla 05-09-2019 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 14261570)
Nah, **** that.

KC releases Hill

The media would respond with "Oh, what a move by the chiefs, taking a stand. Good for them!"

Another team signs Tyreek Hill later and and it's all:

"Well, what a smart move to get a great player for so cheap. Everyone deserves second chances!"

Yeah, I already watched the Kareem Hunt thing play out, and I think he's THE best running back in the NFL. No more shedding great players for nothing if they're just going to play elsewhere. I don't want to play AGAINST Tyreek Hill. **** THAT. Leave it to the Patriots to sign him, rebrand him as a hall of famer, and everyone to just ****ing ignore all the negative shit.

how did people think the hunt deal would go down? I mean, who didn’t think he’d suit up for another team as soon as he was reinstated?

kcclone 05-09-2019 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shiver Me Timbers (Post 14261585)
True to that.
I try to listen to 810 on the internet. the afternoon kkk programing drives me bat shit crayz.



When I’m able to listen I listen to Soren from 10-2, then immediately turn to 610.

KK is such a whiny little b*tch (about everything not just this). It gets nauseating.

Granted 610 was right there with him on the Tyreek thing, but they seem to have walked it back a little.

Pitt Gorilla 05-09-2019 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcclone (Post 14261596)
When I’m able to listen I listen to Soren from 10-2, then immediately turn to 610.

KK is such a whiny little b*tch (about everything not just this). It gets nauseating.

Granted 610 was right there with him on the Tyreek thing, but they seem to have walked it back a little.

This freaking board is right there with them. Chief Fan doesn’t really give a **** about winning.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-09-2019 09:46 PM

KC sports radio is some of the lamest s*** I've ever heard. I wouldn't even waste my time with that garbage.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-09-2019 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLO (Post 14229606)
And if you vote no - you'd better have a good damn reason for doing so.

I really needed to f*** your mom in the ass later that day, so I went ahead and voted no.

We good fam?

Hammock Parties 05-09-2019 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 14261598)
KC sports radio is some of the lamest s*** I've ever heard. I wouldn't even waste my time with that garbage.

Tyreek trying to find Kietzman's tiny dick:


<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7-6CKCXntgE" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Shiver Me Timbers 05-09-2019 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 14261599)
I really needed to f*** your mom in the ass later that day, so I went ahead and voted no.

We good fam?

Pursuing (and presumably conquering) ones mother and then voting no to the poll has nothing to do with one or the other. But I would assume you are good if you fed her and she left happy.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-09-2019 10:05 PM

LMAO

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-09-2019 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shiver Me Timbers (Post 14261615)
Pursuing (and presumably conquering) ones mother and then voting no to the poll has nothing to do with one or the other. But I would assume you are good if you fed her and she left happy.

It's a political statement really. The post makes as much sense as keeping Hill away from team activities at this point.

Shiver Me Timbers 05-09-2019 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14261605)
Tyreek trying to find Kietzman's tiny dick:

I have come to a conclusion-
90% of the other NFL teams/ fans are scared to even visit this forum
Claynus and the 86 thread is the icing on the cake.
KKK is reading this and will respond in the PM. Or will be twittering soon....
You all rock.
Carry on

mr. tegu 05-09-2019 10:21 PM

It was ridiculous from the very first day to demand he be cut. It continues to be ridiculous at this point.

On the ridiculousness scale, it is also right up there to say we should trade him because of this, even if and when nothing comes of this whole situation.

Shiver Me Timbers 05-09-2019 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 14261594)
how did people think the hunt deal would go down? I mean, who didn’t think he’d suit up for another team as soon as he was reinstated?

Gorilla that is the problem- Nobody in the front office FULLY thought thru the actual /potential consequences with K Hunt release. With Tyreek- They are living once bitten twice shy. Damned if you Do / Damned if you don't has turned into the waiting game we are all living.

Pitt Gorilla 05-09-2019 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shiver Me Timbers (Post 14261646)
Gorilla that is the problem- Nobody in the front office FULLY thought thru the actual /potential consequences with K Hunt release. With Tyreek- They are living once bitten twice shy. Damned if you Do / Damned if you don't has turned into the waiting game we are all living.

There was literally no downside to keeping Hunt; I said the same at the time.

RINGLEADER 05-09-2019 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 14261650)
There was literally no downside to keeping Hunt; I said the same at the time.

Yes yes yes

Just don't get what releasing him proved, beyond the fact that no one is going to care when he takes the field in week 9 this year and the Chiefs got absolutely nothing for him.

007 05-09-2019 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 14261659)
Yes yes yes

Just don't get what releasing him proved, beyond the fact that no one is going to care when he takes the field in week 9 this year and the Chiefs got absolutely nothing for him.

I think the Chiefs expected the NFL to suspend him for the entire next season. They won't make the same mistake twice. Everyone knew he would suit up again.

Shiver Me Timbers 05-09-2019 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 14261650)
There was literally no downside to keeping Hunt; I said the same at the time.

I know that and regardless of what the uber lib /sjw crowd is espousing
I agree WITH YOU- as bad as it sound to the guy who works 9-5, drives a Prius and spends his weekend protesting the guberment for the injustice of the day.

Logic and reason is a powerful tool.

Pitt Gorilla 05-09-2019 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 007 (Post 14261663)
I think the Chiefs expected the NFL to suspend him for the entire next season. They won't make the same mistake twice. Everyone knew he would suit up again.

Even if they did, what’s the advantage in releasing him?

Shiver Me Timbers 05-09-2019 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 14261667)
Even if they did, what’s the advantage in releasing him?

Zero. Zilch. Nada.
That means no advantage to those of you who went to private skool

007 05-09-2019 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 14261667)
Even if they did, what’s the advantage in releasing him?

Getting away from the media firestorm it caused. Thats pretty much the only thing they could have been thinking.

Pitt Gorilla 05-09-2019 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 007 (Post 14261680)
Getting away from the media firestorm it caused. Thats pretty much the only thing they could have been thinking.

Lord knows the Browns are certainly taking it on the chin.

007 05-10-2019 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 14261683)
Lord knows the Browns are certainly taking it on the chin.

Well of course, they are the saviors that provided him a second chance. They come out smelling like roses. He will probably get comeback player of the year too.

Its a load of crap but it is what it is.

cooper barrett 05-10-2019 01:01 AM

Just how does having 1/2 of your offence being violent crininals charged or not affect he value of the team?

At what point does Clark say "Take the offer, get it in front of the League. I quit"?

BlackOp 05-10-2019 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cooper barrett (Post 14261709)
Just how does having 1/2 of your offence being violent crininals charged or not affect he value of the team?

At what point does Clark say Take the offer, get it in front of the League. I quit?

So "violent criminals" is now kicking a racist, drunk chick in the ass ...Damn, I think Quentin Tarantino has his next villain for a new movie.

"Dont look him in eye...He's been known to kick people in the ass for calling him n#gger...even the rarest of all cherished life-forms arent safe...a white entitled brat from the suburbs...he knows no bounds. He's a dangerous monster"

The internet has ruined humans...

Pitt Gorilla 05-14-2019 01:15 PM

Feel like this should be pinned to the top for reference.

JakeF 05-14-2019 01:50 PM

After the initial media releases, Hill looks like he probably didn't do it. We don't know and until we know the team shouldn't release him. Unless there is concrete proof, hell no.

Naptown Chief 05-14-2019 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shiver Me Timbers (Post 14261666)
I know that and regardless of what the uber lib /sjw crowd is espousing
I agree WITH YOU- as bad as it sound to the guy who is unemployed, plays Call of Duty 36 (or whatever installment it is now) all day, reposts _____'s latest fiery tweet about free shit, gun control, and orange man bad, then spends his weekend protesting the guberment for the injustice of the day

Logic and reason is a powerful tool.

fyp

smithandrew051 05-14-2019 02:07 PM

What if the Chiefs went ahead and announced that Tyreek will be back with the team next year?

Take the media shit storm now and no one will care by the time the season starts. There will be a bit of a circus at training camp, but this at least gives our players time to prepare for that. Reid has plenty of time to coach everyone up on their responses to the reporters.

JakeF 05-14-2019 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 14268037)
What if the Chiefs went ahead and announced that Tyreek will be back with the team next year?

Take the media shit storm now and no one will care by the time the season starts. There will be a bit of a circus at training camp, but this at least gives our players time to prepare for that. Reid has plenty of time to coach everyone up on their responses to the reporters.

Then you walk into a mob of protesters and reporters swarming the first day of TC. I suppose you could announce it and then have press conferences every day until they all get worn out and stop coming.

Pitt Gorilla 05-14-2019 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 14268037)
What if the Chiefs went ahead and announced that Tyreek will be back with the team next year?

Take the media shit storm now and no one will care by the time the season starts. There will be a bit of a circus at training camp, but this at least gives our players time to prepare for that. Reid has plenty of time to coach everyone up on their responses to the reporters.

It certainly wouldn't hurt, but the Chiefs don't exactly make smart decisions (see: Hunt, Kareem).

Pitt Gorilla 05-14-2019 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 14268080)
Then you walk into a mob of protesters and reporters swarming the first day of TC. I suppose you could announce it and then have press conferences every day until they all get worn out and stop coming.

Who gives a ****?

JakeF 05-14-2019 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 14268084)
Who gives a ****?

I imagine that Tyreek Hill, Andy Reid, and Veach care because they have to sit there and take shit for a couple of hours each day. At least they would probably get tired of asking the same questions and stop showing up.

smithandrew051 05-14-2019 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 14268080)
Then you walk into a mob of protesters and reporters swarming the first day of TC. I suppose you could announce it and then have press conferences every day until they all get worn out and stop coming.

If that’s going to happen, wouldn’t you prefer it happen at the beginning of Training Camp as opposed to Week 1? Go ahead and take the lumps if you know they’re coming.

Nothing says the Chiefs can’t release Tyreek Hill later if new evidence comes out. Just deal with it then.

JakeF 05-14-2019 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 14268090)
If that’s going to happen, wouldn’t you prefer it happen at the beginning of Training Camp as opposed to Week 1? Go ahead and take the lumps if you know they’re coming.

Nothing says the Chiefs can’t release Tyreek Hill later if new evidence comes out. Just deal with it then.

Yea, i get it. But it Hill would also get lost in the swarm of stuff going on during the start of training camp. Everyone interviewing people all over. Hill would be less of a spectacle when surrounded by a ton of other stuff during TC.

I don't know, there's good and bad either way. Hill is going to have to stand up and take shit sooner or later. The Chiefs would do well to take Hill to school about doing interviews. Teach him how to avoid certain words and never show anger etc. How Hill presents himself during Press Conference will help or hurt a lot.

King_Chief_Fan 05-14-2019 05:10 PM

Release him once the evidence says so.
Until then, u keep him suspended and practice and play without him.

Hammock Parties 05-14-2019 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 14268304)
u keep him suspended and practice and play without him.

ROFL

dude didn't do anything

how about we just let him play and skull**** everyone and give a giant middle finger to the rest of the league and the media?

FringeNC 05-14-2019 05:14 PM

What if Mahomes says he won't sign an extension if we cut Hill?

Hammock Parties 05-14-2019 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 14268309)
What if Mahomes says he won't sign an extension if we cut Hill?

Dude.

Tyreek Hill is not going to be cut under any circumstances.

Stop reading bullshit in the media.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.