![]() |
Yeah he’s not good
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">It will be huge if Rob Havenstein is able to go for the Rams tonight against the Cardinals. <br><br>At one point, Joe Noteboom was a quality spot-starter. Has not been the case for awhile. Noteboom has two starts in Week 1 and 10. He's allowed 9 pressures + 2 sacks in those games.</p>— Blaine Grisak (@bgrisakTST) <a href="https://twitter.com/bgrisakTST/status/1873040822071116034?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 28, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Willie Roaf… not a free agent, was at the start of a 6 year contract… traded to the Chiefs.
OBJ… not a free agent… traded to the Chiefs. Think beyond just the current LT UFA’s and draft class since both are mostly trash. |
Quote:
We don't know. He might really be that bad. He might just need more time. So many guys came into the NFL looking like him and eventually became starters. And yes, a whole bunch of them failed or never became tackles. Are you going to write off ALL tackles who struggle in their first seasons as guards at best? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As I've said before, basically only future HOFers show up as rookies and immediately start kicking everyones ass... the rest need 1-3 years to really develop |
I really don’t think humphries is an option if we plan to bring in a veteran FA for competition. We’re either rolling with status quo next year and hoping he or Kingsley will improve. Or we let humphries walk and bring someone in. He is either on a prove it deal where he can be assured playing time. Or he will want to be paid on a long term deal more than backup money.
|
Quote:
Quote:
This staff felt VERY good about Kingsley going into the year. They don’t just pencil rookies in for starting roles. And he had that. He also just turned 22. That’s why throwing a ton of assets on another unknown doesn’t make sense. Will he develop into a franchise LT? No idea. But it’s not out of the realm of possibility |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
They ate money to let little develop because the floors the same and the ceilings yet to be seen. That says it all.
|
Quote:
OBJ had taken over for an injured Ronnie Stanley and played well-well enough that he refused to go back to the right side, as it was always his father's dream that he too would play LEFT tackle and make LEFT tackle money. And so he was traded. and then he thought he deserved more money than we were offering-and since he didn't get what he wanted, he signed with our top rival for less out of spite. So **** that guy. Neither of these are great examples for your argument. |
Quote:
For that matter, does Kingsley LOOK like a guard to you? He doesn't look like the body type to me. He's long and long legged. That doesn't scream 'guard' to me, it says 'tackle'. I'm not writing him off, but you need at least a stop-gap there. If you sign someone with the intent of being here for multiple years that's fine, too-you can play Kingsley at RT in '26. If he ain't ready by then, he ain't going to cut it period. |
Lookit-as Spags would say-
We don't watch practice. We don't know what the coaching staff thinks. Obviously things didn't go according to plan at LT this season. Much like WR, Plan A and plan B and plan C all failed. Now, if they and the doctors think Humphries can go with a full offseason in the program I won't gripe. He would be probably the cheapest option, unless a full season of rest and healing up has Bahktiari ready to go. Stanley's hurt too much for my taste at that price. Jackson's resume is thin, but that's the highest upside at that price. Robinson is probably the higher floor. We will need another excellent draft like '22 to fill holes, so we really can't get into LT range in the draft. Doesn't make sense to take on another project. So that's probably out. And that's just how I see it right now. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.