When did they say they are taking action this week? I don't think the NFL takes any action until the police investigation is completely wrapped up.

I'm thinking the Chiefs need to get with the league and find a way that Tyreek can be suspended for the entire year, or most of it, or something.

Spend that year rehabilitating his public image so when they bring him back in 2020 on a franchise tag, it's socially acceptable in the same vein as if he had been cut and gone to another team.

He has a good year and then they can probably sign him to a decent extension, though certainly it won't be the riches he desired before all of this.

Worst case scenario he gets tagged again.

So yea um Crystal could be looking at international charges....

Apparently recording a conversation in Dubai is punishable under law

Yep- they'd have all the financial help they could ever want.

It's crazy he was looking at 100 million and now he'll never come close to that.

Federal Law:

Article 378 of Federal Law No.(3) of 1987 of the Penal Code as amended by Federal Law No. 34 of 2005 specificall states that:

"A punishment of confinement and fine shall be inflicted on any person who attacks the sanctity of individuals' private or family life by committing any of the following acts in other than the legally permitted cases or without the victim's consent:

A: Eavesdropping or recording or transmitting by any system of whatever kind, any conversation held at a particular place or via the phone or any other set.

B: Picking up or transmitting by any system of whatever kind, a person's picture at a particular place.

If the acts referred to in the above two cases during a meeting within the hearing or sight of the person attending, their consent shall be required.” It is clear that Tyreek’s girlfriend violated the UAE’s Federal Laws for recording that conversation but KCTV5, I believe, is not authorized to release an illegally obtained conversation, especially one that was out of the United States jurisdiction!

If he's suspended for the entire season, Chiefs won't have to worry about the franchise tag, he'd play 2020 on the last year of his deal.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...this-week/amp/
My bad "likely" .... but still same thing applies... if they do what has happened to Kraft. It's not an on the field issue.

I have to admit, you're doing a GREAT job of thinking like a mature and rational woman.



Unfortunately, that doesn't apply here. CLEARLY.

If Tyreek did do this it would be wise for the Chiefs to not release him as he could go off the deep end and possibly kill Crystal. Stay on the team and go to meetings and get the help he needs. He better thank Clark Hunt, Coach Reid and Brett Veach at his HOF press conference

so 2019 wouldn't count?

Stay within the system. Keep his rights, let the NFL decide what to do with him. If the league allows him to play again, then figure out what you want to do at that point. He might get blacklisted anyway. But I wouldn't just release him to make a point. Might even try to help him rehabilitate. Doesn't mean I condone his actions in any way, and doesn't mean he ever plays a down here again.

But I don't have nearly as much invested in this shituation as the Chiefs do.

Imagine Watkins, Hill and Hardman all on the field together with D Rob and the Williams bros. Oh yea I forgot Kelce as well. We would be unstoppable

I sure it's only the Chiefs recently who have had 2 shitheads do things that are grounds for dismissal for things that the NFL would/will/has suspended players for. I haven't read the negotiated agreement but to me it seems to need a clause for a team to have a "right of first refusal" for situations like Hunt, Hill, Vick and others out there. Player does something bad enough to go to jail or have everyone screaming for his dismissal so team does. A year or two later after paying their penance they want back in football. It's seems to me that the team with the original "rights" to the player should get a chance to bring them back if desired. My mind isn't made up on if they deserve compensation if they go elsewhere or not but at least a chance to say stay or go.
I hope this is addressed in the next negotiations.

If one of the two parties is consenting recording, it’s legal evidence.

In this case, she was consenting.

Except I’m pretty sure Hill has no idea he was being recorded