![]() |
Quote:
|
The only LB that I’m taking in the first round is Owusu-Koramoah. And he won’t be there at #31.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
LB's don't cover =>good TE's. We need DLine and Secondary. |
Quote:
Pick a LB in the top 15. That's good value. Otherwise wait until the 2nd or 3rd. There's little value in LB's in the late first. You're likely getting a developmental player there. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Good to know. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
OK out of Notre Dame would be the Dirty Dan replacement. He can cover TEs and RBs....but he can also blitz and play the run well.
Too bad he won’t be there. |
The bottom line is this:
Top flight LB prospects like Kuechly, White, Simmons, and Bush go in the top 15. After that, the value at LB is outside the first round. Bobby Wagner is the PERFECT example of that. So by mentioning Kuechly and Wagner, you're proving my point. Again, I thank you. |
I totally agree that if all things are equal and we can choose between a game changing WR, OL, DE or LB @31, we should probably wait to take a LB and trading down would likely be very wise.
Where I disagree is that LB isn’t a valued position because we only use 2 linebackers the majority of the time. Like...haven’t you guys seen that glaring weakness against teams with balanced attacks? Spags saw Neimann as our best option in those sets. Think about that for a moment. Spags saw a complete liability as our best option for a set we use frequently and some of you don’t see that upgrade as a need worthy of the 31st or even our pick in the second. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.