ChiefsPlanet
Page 85 of 283 « First 357581828384 85 8687888995135185 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Marcus Peters traded to Rams (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=314072)

RealSNR 02-23-2018 05:31 PM
What the **** is our goddamn ****ing hurry to trade him to the Rams if the compensation isn't good enough?

This is the THIRD ****ing time Dorsey/Veach haven't been able to ****ing contain themselves to wait until the league year begins before they trade a player. How often does that happen? I can't even recall it ever happening before he did it with Smith in 2013. Then the Smith trade AGAIN in 2018. I mean, that one was ****ing great, and I can understand why Veach made the offer he had, but Christ. To not even get a 1st rounder for ****ing Marcus ****ing Peters when the league year hasn't even begun? If the compensation isn't what you want, then JUST ****ING WAIT. Jesus ****ing Christ.

Oh, and guess what? The NFL doesn't like this nebulous "unofficial" trading. There's no rule against it, but it's the ****ing NFL, guys. Those assholes will interpret this secret meeting bullshit the Chiefs constantly partake in as going against rules for fair negotiations since other teams are waiting until March every year to get their shit done. You can damn well bet they're going to re-write the rule AND find a way to **** the Chiefs over and punish them for thinking they can constantly work around the NFL's rules on offseason trades.

That's all that's missing. We lose Peters. ****ing shitty as ****. We get ****ed on compensation. Double ****ing shitty as ****. It can't get any worse, right?

Nope. The NFL swoops in. Watch it happen. That's the only missing piece left.

I'm ****ing furious.

Simply Red 02-23-2018 05:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 13433454)
IGWF
oh yes me too! thanks u - all drak to thanks

Bwana 02-23-2018 05:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 13433434)
No one but Chiefs brass has the slightest clue what we're getting back

The whole thing is one big goat**** until we get some answers from Arrowhead
Yep LOTS of speculation and half baked theories but no concrete answers......yet.

staylor26 02-23-2018 05:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 13433439)
Just because an idiot said it doesn't mean it can't also happen to be true.

I mean Peters clearly disliked how Sutton ran the defense. Who can blame him. You really don't think keeping Sutton was part of this?
It might be one of the reasons Peters asked for a trade (definitely not the main reason). Also, Peters reportedly asked for a trade after the Titans game, so Nick’s claim that he asked for a trade because they retained Sutton doesn’t make sense.

It had absolutely nothing to do with why the Chiefs wanted him gone though.

Simply Red 02-23-2018 05:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KCBOSS1 (Post 13433453)
Peters heard it from KC fans over the national anthem thing. He also heard it from the fans because he was a distracted liability through about the 1st 2/3 of the season. He got torched considerably. I think the front office knew the writing was on the wall and they could get something for him now. His attitude sucked through much of the season. I will miss his talent, but character still means something to me; means something to the Chiefs office. Man, sometimes He is impressive though... gonna miss that.

Dude he heard it from his mama

Fish 02-23-2018 05:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KCBOSS1 (Post 13433453)
Peters heard it from KC fans over the national anthem thing. He also heard it from the fans because he was a distracted liability through about the 1st 2/3 of the season. He got torched considerably. I think the front office knew the writing was on the wall and they could get something for him now. His attitude sucked through much of the season. I will miss his talent, but character still means something to me; means something to the Chiefs office. Man, sometimes He is impressive though... gonna miss that.
Pretty sure Peters doesn't give one single **** about what the fans think.

CoMoChief 02-23-2018 05:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 13433415)
Shefter said he didn't think a 1st was involved.
<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/RGK9jWz0t89Hy" width="480" height="480" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/reaction-dogs-texting-RGK9jWz0t89Hy">via GIPHY</a></p>

DaneMcCloud 02-23-2018 05:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 13433449)
Fuller is gonna be good. Already is. Having him as Peters replacement though makes us a weaker secondary than last year and it was already a major issue.

All the net gain from the Fuller trade is potentially flying out the window.
Nah. The Chiefs received a 3rd from the Redskins and will receive additional picks for Peters.

Also, let’s keep in mind that the Chiefs merely need a good cornerback to replace Peters. A player that’s consistent and smart. While it would be nice, they don’t need an All Pro to replace him.

The Chiefs were 30th in defense with Peters and at this point, I fully trust Veach to find another good corner, along with other defensive upgrades.

Bwana 02-23-2018 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 13433449)
Fuller is gonna be good. Already is. Having him as Peters replacement though makes us a weaker secondary than last year and it was already a major issue.

All the net gain from the Fuller trade is potentially flying out the window.
It's along time before opening day, this team is going to make a lot of moves before then.

DaneMcCloud 02-23-2018 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fish (Post 13433461)
Pretty sure Peters doesn't give one single **** about what the fans think.
Out of everything posted in this thread, this statement is a 100% certainty

Simply Red 02-23-2018 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13433464)
Nah. The Chiefs received a 3rd from the Redskins and will receive additional picks for Peters.

Also, let’s keep in mind that the Chiefs merely need a good cornerback to replace Peters. A player that’s consistent and smart. While it would be nice, they don’t need an All Pro to replace him.

The Chiefs were 30th in defense with Peters and at this point, I fully trust Veach to find another good corner, along with other defensive upgrades.
Dane has been on-point through this whole thing, it's like exactly my position - only w/ football knowledge incld'd.

srvy 02-23-2018 05:35 PM
If you believe Keitzman he said he has a source high up in Chiefs front office. He told him that about every coach including Head coach sat down with Marcus to find out what was eating at him he wouldnt talk to them. Then the owner sat down with him trying to see what the organization could do for him here. He got nothing from the kid. If thats true and who knows but if so **** MP's.

Coogs 02-23-2018 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 13433388)
This is a dumb move that made the defense worse.
I listened to Stan Weber, and he disagrees with you on the defense got worse. He grades the defense on a 1-10 basis on each play, and said Peters has way too many plays where he grades out on a 1-3 score. Way more plays there than the occasional turnover he creates offsets those plays.

He also said he doesn't think the Chiefs are done getting rid of defenders that were the leaders of this team.

RunKC 02-23-2018 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 13433456)
What the **** is our goddamn ****ing hurry to trade him to the Rams if the compensation isn't good enough?

This is the THIRD ****ing time Dorsey/Veach haven't been able to ****ing contain themselves to wait until the league year begins before they trade a player. How often does that happen? I can't even recall it ever happening before he did it with Smith in 2013. Then the Smith trade AGAIN in 2018. I mean, that one was ****ing great, and I can understand why Veach made the offer he had, but Christ. To not even get a 1st rounder for ****ing Marcus ****ing Peters when the league year hasn't even begun? If the compensation isn't what you want, then JUST ****ING WAIT. Jesus ****ing Christ.

Oh, and guess what? The NFL doesn't like this nebulous "unofficial" trading. There's no rule against it, but it's the ****ing NFL, guys. Those assholes will interpret this secret meeting bullshit the Chiefs constantly partake in as going against rules for fair negotiations since other teams are waiting until March every year to get their shit done. You can damn well bet they're going to re-write the rule AND find a way to **** the Chiefs over and punish them for thinking they can constantly work around the NFL's rules on offseason trades.

That's all that's missing. We lose Peters. ****ing shitty as ****. We get ****ed on compensation. Double ****ing shitty as ****. It can't get any worse, right?

Nope. The NFL swoops in. Watch it happen. That's the only missing piece left.

I'm ****ing furious.
Peters is an enormous cancer that even Andy Reid got sick of. 1 team truly wanted him.

The market showed what the league thought of this guy and t wasn’t ****ing good

KChiefs1 02-23-2018 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-post Tom (Post 13433392)
My sister's husband's uncle's real estate agent knows Robert Quinn's sister. Says the moving vans are at Rob's house and the destination is Leawood, KS. So it must have been more than just draft picks. :):):)


https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...9e91def6a3.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...9b8bf7646b.jpg


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 PM.
Page 85 of 283 « First 357581828384 85 8687888995135185 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.