ChiefsPlanet - Funny Stuff New Conference re-alignment thread

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

New Conference re-alignment thread (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249847)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7936755)

This list that keeps getting posted is really just ticket sales from what I can tell. The biggest stadiums are all at the top.

Not including TV deals, merchandise etc that create revenue outside of ticket sales.

That's why the bball school numbers appear so low.

It's just cherry picking, but who really cares at this point.

Why else would a school like Iowa be listed alongside Ohio State.

In reality the schools aren't even close in value.

Pretty sure that list is total revenue including TV revenue, because if it wasn't, there is no way in hell the Big 10 basketball schools would be ahead of Kansas. But most of the Big 10 basketball revenues are actually higher than Kansas. The only thing I don't think it takes into account is the Williams Fund. A large majority of the ticket revenue is not actually on that list and is privately accounted for from what I am told. Don't know many other schools that do it that way except UNC.

You are correct about the 3rd tier network Kansas has. I'm astounded it's worth as much as it is televising shitty games against Fort Hayes State.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie007 (Post 7936740)

I doubt it. Kansas barely turns a profit in football. I just looked up basketball and football revenue figures and KU is third to last in division 1 football profits. Revenue isn't all that much either.

If I was Pac 10, I'd want Oklahoma State over KU. Decent at football, Top 20 program in basketball. Throughout this I never thought of Oklahoma State as being the little brother of Oklahoma the same way K-State is to KU. OSU IMO is a legitimate school with a legitimate athletic program.

OSU also has T. Boone, which most schools don't have. Although I can believe some of the Pac 12 schools like Stanford do care about the academic side of it, which hurts OSU and Texas Tech. I also think all of the fans of California teams would probably rather light themselves on fire than make conference road trips to Lubbock, TX.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie007 (Post 7936765)

I searched that site for the source of their numbers.

I can't find it so who knows what those numbers actually are from.

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7936762)

So, that doesn't include football merchandise either? Oh shit.

I don't know what it includes.

It's a list created by a hot blonde girl who doesn't site any of her sources.

So who knows

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7936778)

I don't know what it includes.

It's a list created by a hot blonde girl who doesn't site any of her sources.

So who knows

False.

The data in these charts is from reports filed by each school with the U.S. Department of Education

I see that there is no new information here. oh well

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 7936808)

I see that there is no new information here. oh well

Its over. Everyone is stuck together as they should be. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7936833)

Its over. Everyone is stuck together as they should be. :)

Who is everyone? OU & UT

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveSteam (Post 7936834)

Who is everyone? OU & UT

I'm more concerned with the traditions of KU-MU-KSU

But sure. Throw the Sooners and Stacey King in there too!

Hey KSU just ran an option into the end zone. God I hope they take it to THE ****ING U

Quote:

A little confirmation on MU and the SEC

By Mike DeArmond - Posted on 24 September 2011

I am not big on looking to other reporters to re-confirm what I have already reported as true. But for all those who insist that the Missouri-SEC connection is a fabrication.

Tony Barnhart of CBS (and Mr. SEC to most folk) just said on national TV that Missouri needed to make up its mind about the SEC.

You cannot make up your mind on a offer that has not been made, informal or otherwise.

The interest from the SEC to make Missouri SEC No. 14 is there.

Will Missouri end up in the SEC? Should it?

My personal opinion is that if Missouri and the other non-University of Texas schools in the Big 12 can legislate or initiate change in the Big 12, then staying in the Big 12 makes the most sense for Mizzou.

Think of it this way:

1. Forget the Longhorn Network's cash payout to Texas. Nothing you can do about it but you can legislate what they are able to NOT show on it.

2. For the first time in history, the other eight Big 12 schools actually vote as a block and after grandfathering in the LHN, rewrite conference bylaws to legislate totally even revenue distribution on everything else from this day forward.

If Missouri cannot get that within the next two weeks, then go ahead and take the SEC offer, whether informal or formal.

Four hours to game time in Oklahoma.
And I for one am looking forward to covering a game.

Read more: http://campuscorner.kansascity.com/n...#ixzz1YuaezPdh

http://campuscorner.kansascity.com/node/2078

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7936776)

I searched that site for the source of their numbers.

I can't find it so who knows what those numbers actually are from.

http://businessofcollegesports.com/2...rgest-profits/

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie007 (Post 7936873)

http://businessofcollegesports.com/2...rgest-profits/

No I see that but they don't link it to any real site with data. Most meaningful being what comprises these numbers?

Tickets
Merchandise
TV Deals
Concessions
Donations (Williams Fund)
Adjust for regional inflation?

I'm just curious.

Boys, boys... Let's stay focused here. It's Saturday. Enjoy the games.

Man aTm looks good. Look out SEC