each conference needs 1 playoff team and maybe add 2 at large bids. Wont change the outcome were currently seeing but atleast it will keep people more interested in the sport.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But then the bowls would have to agree. Lots of money there. Maybe this year is a way to get rid of some of the bowl games that suck. Then get rid of the dead time in Dec. I am not saying I have a better answer |
Adding more teams adds the chance for upsets.
I’m hoping the Oklahoma Florida game adds a second look into this current system. |
Alabama beat in the final rankings #2, #4, #5, #7 and #12 teams.
|
College football has become predictable and boring.
The same teams get the top recruits each year and most coast through the season until the playoffs begin, which once again are boring and predictable. If the same 4 to 6 teams out of 120 are in the playoffs each year, why bother watching? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Today, if you don't have a potential First Round QB as your starter, you're definitely not in the national conversation as the best team in the country. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It also increases the chances of some 4-5 star athletes to go to other schools to start, rather than go to Alabama to be a backup. Really what’s the downside of expanding the playoffs? An SEC school gets upset? ND maybe wins one game? |
Quote:
That's complete fantasy there. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.