Well if we’re gonna use what bill does as our guide we should probably go ahead and roll with some sixth round qb

You guys are probably right and I would amend my take on possibly taking a rb in the late first

It’s not ideally what I’d do but you could have a situation where a great talent falls to you there

No way I’d do it early

You're not making any sense LMAO

But I like how you seem to think you're smarter than guys like Belichick and Sean McVay.

That’s not unusual for me

https://apexfantasyleagues.com/2019/...-2019-update/#

The Chiefs have gotten and will continue to get more long term value from Fisher who is not a great player than the Giants will from Barkley. Fisher is 28 now and can still play a lot more years. RBs are rarely still effective at 28. A RB in the top half of the 1st round makes little sense.

A lot of this basically stems from the drought of elite caliber backs since 2000 and it has been twisted into "they have no value"

The Fisher over Barkley thing is pretty funny though. I'm sure the Cardinals still love that they took Levi Brown over Adrian Peterson.

chargers are falling apart/Rivers is old as dirt
Chiefs/Mahomes are in for an unprecedented regression.
donks lol

Damn the entire division is shitting the bed. It's like handing the division title to Da Raiders on a silver platter. Love you too AFC West.

Barkley wouldn’t even be on the team at this point, and if he was he’d probably be breaking down and overpaid.

Of course all things even you take a Barkley over a Fisher, but I’d rather have Fisher right now than a overpaid aging RB. That’s the point.

Yes

When the Giants are ready to consistently compete Barkley will not be effective. Bad use of a pick.

Fisher had a horrible rookie year and got a holding call against an old James Harrison that cost us the Steelers playoff game. How have the Chiefs gotten more 'long term value' out of Eric Fisher when Saquon has only played one season? Unlike Fisher, Saquon had a great rookie year.

Such homers on here w the Eric Fisher over Saquon crap.

I have no problem paying a RB if they earned it. Not seeing it. What MG has going for him is they dont have a viable RB back behind him. It's a weak group without him. So he does have leverage and he could get paid.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Melvin Gordon thinks the Chargers “will cave” and pay him, or another team will be willing to trade for him if the holdout lasts “deep in the regular season,” a source told B/R’s <a href="https://twitter.com/mikefreemanNFL?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@mikefreemanNFL</a> �� <a href="https://t.co/UsuwUn1qiM">pic.twitter.com/UsuwUn1qiM</a></p>&mdash; B/R Gridiron (@brgridiron) <a href="https://twitter.com/brgridiron/status/1151533165191880705?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 17, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I think they'll cave. I hope they'll cave.

They see this as their window and have always been high on Gordon.

An aging vet QB with a young defense in their prime.

Within the next year or two they're going to have to pay their young talent and Rivers' arm already started to fade down the stretch last season.

Chargers will the take the Steelers road for sure on this one IMHO; go elsewhere and get your so-called big payday.:rolleyes: IF Leveon didn't get paid then Gordon definitely will not get paid because Gordon is no Bell and the Chargers know that.

You may be right as well and they do the stupid thing and screw their cap up.