So, which player will The Sporting News select to go in the first round this year who won't even be drafted?

A dumbass is someone who says that Gholston lacks a motor when it's considered one of his greatest strengths and the same friggin' argument has been made 10 times on here in the last two days.

The potential was what Sure-Oz's comments, not mine.

And any scouting report that says Vernon Gholston could play D-Tackle should be burned and then pissed on.

As I was saying.

I made a point yesterday that some of the talking heads on TV said if you watch the tape of Gholston... he disappears. And for taking their word for it, I was tossed into the dumbass group.

Chris Long is the safe pick; Gholston is the kind of guy you build an entire defense around.

I'm not surprised that most people on here want to go with the safe, low-risk prospect.

You were provided the multiple sources that you said didn't exist. It's time to STFU and STFD.

You gotta consider your sources. Merril Hoge shouldn't be trusted to start an electric weed-eater, let alone give draft advice.

It's the same thing with TSN. When your source says that a guy who is 265 could play DT, they need to have their head examined.

It's like trusting Athan for draft advice (completely homer-filled mock), or Adam Teicher. Look at that mock Teicher made today. If that doesn't speak to a complete lack of understanding of what the purpose of the draft is, I don't know what does.

Not saying it's right, but probably because you formed your opinion on what some TV talking head said, instead of forming your own opinion.

Regardless, your good by me. Opinions is what makes this place go.

Is it possible that most people want to go for Chris Long because they feel he's simply better? Just curious.

That seems to be the word from a lot of analysis. Now before I get the "those draft experts don't know shit" common blast, I will say that I would take their word over any BB poster.

It mean it is their job to research this stuff 24 - 7.

I don't have any tape to form my own opinion on. I watch a lot of college football too. But Ohio State is not one of the teams I enjoy watching, so I usually watch another game instead. And I am cool with you OTW58. :toast:

Look, you ignorant c*nt. If you want to put your stock in a scouting report that says that Gholston could play D-Tackle, well I suggest you might as well have unprotected sex with a bisexual heroin-addicted Botswanan prostitute.


Scott Wright >> Direckshun>>> Mel Kiper >>> A drooling reerun >>>> The Sporting News.

Chris Long seems to be more of a finished product and ready to go where as gholston is a freak and could get tons better, or regress....if its up to me i would rather go with gholston first

I think Gholston would be great as a 3-4 pass rusher where he could bull rush the QB, run downhill. But I haven't seen many moves from him to think he'll be a great 4-3 DE. When I watch him he's very stiff and just relies completely on his speed to run by someone, no spins, no rips or sidesteps. Doesn't use his hands very well. He's not a Dwight Freeney or Osi Umenyiora type player with a good set of moves to get by someone to go along with speed.

Being in the Columbus area, O$U was on the tube every game (have Direct TV) and Gholston did hide at times in games....

Exactly, and most of the time they are former players.