You mean like:

- Brought about sweeping change in the organization
- Took power away from King Carl
- Made the team focus on the draft
- Stopped the team from blowing their money on FAs who never deliver
- Actually tried to build a team the right way

Even if Herm never wins another game as Chiefs coach and the offense finishes with negative yards in every game, he has already done more positive things for this franchise than anyone else in a decade.

Why I took your dumb ass off my ignore list is beyond me?

I am sorry, I forgot, John Tait, Carl and you were having nut-munching 3-somes with each other.

I did not mean to offend your sugar daddy.


John Tait and Carl loved each other. What the **** was I thinking ?

I suggest you look at the records of each Chiefs team from 1974-1989.

You're a ****ing moron.

2 losing seasons in a row, or 13 losing seasons out of 15 between '74-'89?

I would have done what he did too.

Exactly. The Chiefs do it three weeks ago and they are idiots. The Browns do it on MNF and they are creative genius'.

The problem was the Chiefs did it badly.

So 3 years and we still can't get more than 1 yard on 1st down and that is building the team the right way?



ROFL

This is ****ing classic!

We need to focus on the basics first, like getting a 1st down quicker than 24 mins and 4 possessions into the game.

No. What I did miss, though, was the part where we scored a touchdown with the sloption. Or gained a yard. Or made a positive gain. Or fooled anybody. Or accomplished anything. Whatsoever.

FAX

Nice deflection, ****stick.

I'm not defending anyone. The entire FO needs to be whacked.

However, you're talking out of your ass.

Sorry you don't like getting called out. Maybe you should think before you post.

So, like I said, PROVE the premise of your argument.

It's YOUR argument, how hard is it to PROVE it?

You mean take $14 million up front?

Was that some sort of statement or something?

The only thing we know for a fact about the Tait situation is that Chicago offered more than KC was willing to (or should have) paid. We can speculate about the Tait Carl relationship and what effect it may have had on re-signing him, but it's only speculation. Money is why we lost Tait. Period.

Ding.

I'll reserve my judgment till the end of the season, but I can't remember a team that looked this bad. Maybe the 86-87 team. That team was bad. But I think they won 4 games. At this rate, I don't see us doing that well this year.

Many of the others between 1979-1989 hovered around 6-10 and 8-8. That's bad, but not this bad.

I bet we win 3 games this year and it is the worst Chiefs team since 1977.

So, this is all about Tynes?

JFC.

Larry Twinkle-Toe Tynes?

He ****ing sucks.

But I guess you're used to sucking off losers.

So you think that building a team is based on how many hards a team gets on offense?

I see. No wonder you think Vermeil was great.

And no wonder everyone else thinks you are reeruned.