DeMarcus Ware ran that as a 265lb defensive end...it's a little different.

You can get back to me when you understand the different roles of the LB's in the 3-4, and anyway I can't take the opinion of someone seriously that thinks the best picks for the 3rd pick are a cover backer and a RT.

And you can go blow Dirty Sanchez while jerking off Rey, USC homer. NO ONE takes your schtick seriously because you're a blind homer.

So when did you become a dumbass...this is honestly the most tired schtick on this forum.

"Oh you're a homer" really I give honest takes about all players god forbid I should think a USC player is good. You know they only have the most NFL prospects of any college team.

Really get the shit out of your ears, well I guess you can't because you're just completely full of shit right now.

Ask anyone around here who reads my draft shit if I'm a homer or not.

If anyone could do it no one would care. It is a very difficult thing to do.

Don't worry it'll get ignored like it's no big deal we've been over this stuff before.

If you are so objective, as you claim to be, then why do you whine about having the USC homer thing brought up? It's hilarious that you can't see it... and it's also not surprising.

You were the one being a prick here. If you can't take it, then don't dish it out. I am more than happy to have a civil debate but if you start acting like a know-it-all prick I'm going to call you on it.

Because it gets spouted all the ****ing time, it's a tired comeback when you got nothing better to say.

You know who says people are know it alls...people who feel inferior at the time.

Sacks arent the job of the MLB in the 3-4.

And that's why its an excessively high pick to use on him.

What year did Pioli go to NE?

Here's a histroy of their first round picks since 1999:
2008: Mayo - LB (6)
2007: Meriweather - S (24)
2006: Maroney - RB (21)
2005: Mankins - G (32)
2004: Wilfork - DT (21)
2004: Watson - TE (32)
2003: Warren - DL (13)
2002: Graham - TE (21)
2001: Seymour - DL (6)
2000: None
1999: Woody - OL (17)
1999: Katzenmoyer - LB (28)

I believe he starts with the Seymour pick.

No, in this instance it is in response to a condescending, assinine post on your behalf:

If you're going to condescend people are going to jump your ass. Act like a prick, get treated like one.

Do you really expect to get anything different when you want to take a OT 3rd when we already have a LT?

A lot of lower-round picks, but: 3 DL, 2 TE, 1 OL, 1 RB, 1 DB, and 1 LB

Not exactly targeting "skill" positions. No QBs or WRs

I can completely see them going for Raji. They've addressed LB with Vrabel, and have DJohnson already, might move Hali there as well. But the DLine, especially the big NT, is a total question mark if we switch to a 3-4.