ChiefsPlanet
Page 9 of 39 « First 5678 9 1011121319 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football CUTLER TO BEARS! (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=205240)

Mecca 04-02-2009 03:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 5634856)
This is all really quick and dirty, but if you assume that one-year-later = a one-round drop in value when it comes to draft choices, I figure the deal netted Denver a chart value of around 1300 for Cutler, plus Orton (who I'd say has very little value at all). That's equivalent to the #10 pick.

Even if you assume that the Bears' first's value next year is roughly equivalent to what it's worth this year, that still only puts the total value at the equivalent of our #3 pick. That's not at all too much for a franchise QB.
It's a great deal for the Bears...people who don't think it is either don't like Cutler because he was on the Broncos or they don't value the QB position at all.

EyePod 04-02-2009 03:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5634795)
Don't worry all the QB's in the draft suck, Chiefsplanet told me so.
Never said that, just said that Mark Sanchez does. And you've been saying all along that Stafford is going to suck.

Quesadilla Joe 04-02-2009 03:41 PM
We got ripped the **** off. Denver needed to get a top 10 pick, another 1st round pick, and a pro bowler to make this trade fair.:shake:

Beerfund 04-02-2009 03:42 PM
To complete the trade, the Broncos had to give back a third-round pick in 2009

Mecca 04-02-2009 03:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5634867)
I like how every analyst they've talked to on NFLN have said what a great deal this is for the Bears, how it's impossible to overpay for a franchise QB.

Then read the comments here about how the Donks got over on the Bears...

LMAO
Our fan base is loaded with ****tards who think QB isn't anymore valuable than the Jesus Curry.

EyePod 04-02-2009 03:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5634869)
It's a great deal for the Bears...people who don't think it is either don't like Cutler because he was on the Broncos or they don't value the QB position at all.
I do agree with you here. Kyle Orton is a big step down from Jay Cutler, so I'm pretty excited that he's going to be in Denver... will it be Simms or Orton... my answer is Who Cares?? They're both worse than Cutler.

OnTheWarpath15 04-02-2009 03:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 5634856)
This is all really quick and dirty, but if you assume that one-year-later = a one-round drop in value when it comes to draft choices, I figure the deal netted Denver a chart value of around 1300 for Cutler, plus Orton (who I'd say has very little value at all). That's equivalent to the #10 pick.

Even if you assume that the Bears' first's value next year is roughly equivalent to what it's worth this year, that still only puts the total value at the equivalent of our #3 pick. That's not at all too much for a franchise QB.
FWIW, the 12th and 18th pick is worth 2150.

They could move up to as high as #3.

EDIT: Duh. You mentioned that.

L.A. Chieffan 04-02-2009 03:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cutler7624 (Post 5634871)
We got ripped the **** off. Denver needed to get a top 10 pick, another 1st round pick, and a pro bowler to make this trade fair.:shake:
nice screenname

Kerberos 04-02-2009 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miles (Post 5634823)
Going to be strange to see an actual good QB in Chicago after all these years.
I thought they traded for Cutler?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutler7624 (Post 5634871)
We got ripped the **** off. Denver needed to get a top 10 pick, another 1st round pick, and a pro bowler to make this trade fair.:shake:
Whaaa?? This is Jay Cutler not Tom Brady. If you think C-untler is worth all that then pass whatever your smokin.

Gravedigger 04-02-2009 03:43 PM
They traded 2009 1st rounder 2010 1st rounder and Kyle Orton for Cutler... Bears got hozed.

Mecca 04-02-2009 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EyePod (Post 5634870)
Never said that, just said that Mark Sanchez does. And you've been saying all along that Stafford is going to suck.
I said that really?

That's news to me.

Frazod 04-02-2009 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 5634878)
nice screenname
:LOL:

Mecca 04-02-2009 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gravedigger (Post 5634883)
They traded 2009 1st rounder 2010 1st rounder and Kyle Orton for Cutler... Bears got hozed.
And they continue to show up...

orange 04-02-2009 03:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaCenterJunkie (Post 5634863)
Chiefs should take Sanchez or Stafford if available just to **** w/ the Broncos, and then trade one of their QBs for a first next year.
Yeah... because Cassel who's worth half-a-second at 11-5 is going to be worth a first at 15-17.

EyePod 04-02-2009 03:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5634867)
I like how every analyst they've talked to on NFLN have said what a great deal this is for the Bears, how it's impossible to overpay for a franchise QB.

Then read the comments here about how the Donks got over on the Bears...

LMAO
NFLN blows Cutler constantly though. I say that he's more proven than any QB in the draft, and with the right coaching/defense (like the Bears' defense), he can be phenomenal. Still a great trade for the Bears.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:00 AM.
Page 9 of 39 « First 5678 9 1011121319 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.