Oh, so it's okay to draft some cheese dick that's a major reach because of serious holes in his game just because he plays a position that you think is important? Because that position is a bit more flashy than another? Courtney Brown ring a bell? Gaines Adams? David Carr? Ryan Sims? Charles Rogers? And I could go on and on and on.

**** that.

You should go buy a Redskins hat if that's the way you think. There's a team that drafts shit like that every year. You'd be in nirvana.

And besides, if you don't think that MLB is important, go tell the Bears and Ravens that they'd be a much better team without a guy like Urlacher and Lewis. That they weren't worth that first round pick. That a guy like Peter Warrick or Lawrence Phillips should have been the Bears or Ravens pick, respectively.

Oh MLB is very important, but Curry isn't a MLB.

Also I would give you a long list of ILB busts, but teams aren't dumb enough to draft them #3 overall.

So Gaines Adams is a bust already? God you're a ****ing dipshit. Let's just pick and choose players because they're busts.

Urlacher taken 9th overall. Value difference between the 3rd and 9th pick: 850 points - equal to the 20th pick in the draft.

Lewis taken 26th overall. Value difference between the 3rd and 26th pick: 1500 points - equal to the 7th pick in the draft.

Exactly.

Nice to see you discounting the position that is basically the quarterback of the defense, the guy who's calling the audibles, has to rush, cover, etc. I'm glad to see that you consider that position to be less valuable than, say a LDE, a LOLB, a one gap DT, etc.

However, I think that we do need help on the DL as well as the LB position, but I don't see a guy out there that is substantially better, or even equal to Curry in terms of immediate and long term contribution at any of the front seven spots. So, seeing that we need help on our front seven and Curry is the best of the bunch in this draft, what do you think we should do? I'd draft Curry. Who would you draft that would be a better alternative at the #3 spot? What position of need with what player is better than Curry as you look at the draft?

What are you going to do if we DO take Sanchez? And you do realize that if we trade down and whoever picks at #3 takes Sanchez, that validates these people's opinion as well, right?

Conversely, if he's able to tie his shoe correctly, he'll then surpass all of the expectations your type have of him or his position on the field.

Do you HONESTLY think Curry is going to be the QB of the defense?

Well there are two ILB's, and we can get away with the likes of DJ, Beisle, and/or Williams handling that a little longer. Monte would probably be the best at doing that, unless you believe you need to be a physical specimen for your teammates to hear your audible.

http://i41.tinypic.com/2gwgp4j.jpg

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ekQ_Ja02gTY&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ekQ_Ja02gTY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

MLB more important than DE, OLB and DT?

:popcorn:

So anyone that can tie their shoes can be a solid and consistent player?

He's average the same amount of sacks and 20 less tackles per year than Tamba Hali, and people around here have no problem jumping all over Hali's ass for being a bust, especially when he was picked 16 slots lower than Adams.