| 'Hamas' Jenkins |
03-08-2010 12:09 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by aturnis
(Post 6586241)
Hey Hamas, look up you ****ing abortion. Don't act like you too haven't scoffed at the notion of drafting a LT in the 2nd in favor of moving Albert.
What you DoucheyMcdoucherton's fail to realize is that I do not condone such a move. I'd be all over Gaithers if I though we had a chance at him, but, I don't. A team will give up a 1st for him. If not, then we ought to give up 2b if it'd be enough, 2a if it comes to hardball.
|
No, we've been against the notion of spending a top five pick over a guy who wouldn't be better than Albert.
If we could get someone who could be as good, and perhaps better (while also the same age) as Albert, for a 2nd round pick, you do that.
What second round tackle in this draft has the potential of Branden Albert?
Even if we play Gaither at RT, he's got a great game for RT, particularly in this scheme.
There is no one in this draft with the ability that Gaither has, save Bruce Campbell (if he pans out).
Would you be wary of drafting Bruce Campbell at #50? Sure as shit is brown, I wouldn't. |
