ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs O-Line analysis (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=225191)

Titty Meat 03-21-2010 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6622019)
Kyle Calloway doesn't suck.

He won't be half the player Tony Washington will be.

aturnis 03-21-2010 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6621942)
Yea lets draft the guy who sucks more.

rated higher than sister ****er on nfldraftcountdown.

aturnis 03-21-2010 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6622187)
He won't be half the player Tony Washington will be.

So you like workout warriors. Good to know.

aturnis 03-21-2010 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6622044)
He's not really an answer, either.

If we used a 5th on him I'd be OK with it. Nothing higher though.

You wouldn't use a 4th rounder to finish 2010's o-line? A good pass blocker and a road grader. Yet EVERYONE here wanted a piece of ole Barry Richardson in the 3rd.

milkman 03-21-2010 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6622019)
Kyle Calloway doesn't suck.

I agree with mecca, who said in another thread, that Calloway is just another O'Callaghan.

I wouldn't spend a pick as high as the fifth round on Ryan Calloway.

And yes, I said "Ryan" on purpose.

milkman 03-21-2010 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 6622414)
You wouldn't use a 4th rounder to finish 2010's o-line? A good pass blocker and a road grader. Yet EVERYONE here wanted a piece of ole Barry Richardson in the 3rd.

Barry Richardson has the talent and athletic ability to be a damn good RT.

He just seems to lack the motivation and desire to achieve his potential.

DaneMcCloud 03-21-2010 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6622423)
Barry Richardson has the talent and athletic ability to be a damn good RT.

He just seems to lack the motivation and desire to achieve his potential.

We chatted about this before but I still feel his best position is left tackle, after having started 40 games for Clemson and filling in this past year.

For the Chiefs, I think it's a bit of the square peg/round hole syndrome.

SAUTO 03-21-2010 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6622426)
We chatted about this before but I still feel his best position is left tackle, after having started 40 games for Clemson and filling in this past year.

For the Chiefs, I think it's a bit of the square peg/round hole syndrome.

i think he s an option at either spot. let him and albert fight it out best lt win
Posted via Mobile Device

milkman 03-21-2010 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6622426)
We chatted about this before but I still feel his best position is left tackle, after having started 40 games for Clemson and filling in this past year.

For the Chiefs, I think it's a bit of the square peg/round hole syndrome.

At the end of the day, it doesn't really matter what we think.

First, I think that Albert has far more potential than Richardson at LT, but I think Richardson has some real talent to work with.

I also think that Richardson has more upside as a RT than Albert.
He isn't as long and lean as Albert, and has the frame to add 15 lbs or so without affecting the athletic ability he possesses, which could serve him well as both a run blocker as well as in pass protect.

I also watched Richardson closely at RT last year in the preseason and he played better than any of teh guys we trotted out there all season, including O'Callagahn.

But we saw that this staff does have some sacred cows in Niswanger and Goff.
And as soon as O'Callaghan became familiar with the system, he was trotted out there as the starter, and he proved to be the exact kind of player I said he was when I melted down after the final preseason roster cuts and waiver pickups.

DaneMcCloud 03-21-2010 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6622444)
At the end of the day, it doesn't really matter what we think.

First, I think that Albert has far more potential than Richardson at LT, but I think Richardson has some real talent to work with.

I also think that Richardson has more upside as a RT than Albert.
He isn't as long and lean as Albert, and has the frame to add 15 lbs or so without affecting the athletic ability he possesses, which could serve him well as both a run blocker as well as in pass protect.

I also watched Richardson closely at RT last year in the preseason and he played better than any of teh guys we trotted out there all season, including O'Callagahn.

But we saw that this staff does have some sacred cows in Niswanger and Goff.
And as soon as O'Callaghan became familiar with the system, he was trotted out there as the starter, and he proved to be the exact kind of player I said he was when I melted down after the final preseason roster cuts and waiver pickups.

I agree with everything you've stated, as I have in the past.

From my POV, Richardson has looked "smoother" at left tackle than right. If he can translate that to the right side, he'll be a 10 year starter.

If not, he may end up catching on elsewhere as a left tackle. But there's no doubt he's an NFL caliber lineman.

Titty Meat 03-21-2010 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 6622410)
So you like workout warriors. Good to know.

This is a dumbass statement. Was he a workout warrior when LSU offered him a scholarship?

SAUTO 03-21-2010 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6622489)
This is a dumbass statement. Was he a workout warrior when LSU offered him a scholarship?

what does that have to do with anything, did gholston have a scholorship?
Posted via Mobile Device

Titty Meat 03-21-2010 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6622495)
what does that have to do with anything, did gholston have a scholorship?
Posted via Mobile Device

Certainly you know the difference between a 1st round pick and a 4th round pick. Oh no you don't you're a ****ing idiot.

SAUTO 03-21-2010 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6622498)
Certainly you know the difference between a 1st round pick and a 4th round pick. Oh no you don't you're a ****ing idiot.

wow ok, says a lot about you that you are continually pimping a guy who ****ed his sister, and iirc got her pregnant. par for the course with you billy
Posted via Mobile Device

Deberg_1990 03-21-2010 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6622444)
But we saw that this staff does have some sacred cows in Niswanger and Goff.

heh..yea, im still baffled at the love they felt for these two last year? Any insight into that??


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.