ChiefsPlanet
Page 9 of 15 « First 5678 9 10111213 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Bill Polian rumors start (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=267454)

wazu 12-07-2012 04:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9188368)
I'm a little gunshy on guys who have potentially been propped up by other minds, after what we are going thru right now.
I'm assuming this is an argument for Polian, correct?

O.city 12-07-2012 04:26 PM
At this point, I would be fine with Polian.


Statement more towards coaching.

wazu 12-07-2012 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9188361)
No it ****ing isn't. It's his ****ing son. ROFL
Yeah. Doesn't mean he's an idiot. Could be that it created uncomfortable roles in his personal life that he doesn't want to re-live.

Of course, he may still think hiring his son and trying to prop him up in that role was a great decision, in which case I think it's a good thing that he isn't the one who gets to hire his successor. Clark is.

ToxSocks 12-07-2012 04:30 PM
No

No

No

No

**** NO.

DO NOT WANT.

Indy has always had a shit roster aside from Peyton.

Sorter 12-07-2012 04:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wazu (Post 9188378)
Yeah. Doesn't mean he's an idiot. Could be that it created uncomfortable roles in his personal life that he doesn't want to re-live.

Of course, he may still think hiring his son and trying to prop him up in that role was a great decision, in which case I think it's a good thing that he isn't the one who gets to hire his successor. Clark is.
I doubt it. I assume he wants his son to be an effective GM and will do whatever he can to help him reach that goal.

I don't want Chris Polian involved in any kind of scouting or football decisions. I don't think that is possible if Bill is hired.

ToxSocks 12-07-2012 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 9188353)
anything > Peeoli
anything > Peterson

/2009

BigMeatballDave 12-07-2012 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9188386)
anything > Peterson

/2009
LOL

ToxSocks 12-07-2012 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9188083)
It would suck if a guy who was responsible for two of the greatest dynasties in the last 25 years became our GM for sure.

We're talking 17 seasons of 10+ wins.
Peyton Manning and Jim Kelly.

Once again, QB means everything. None of these men are geniuses....just their QB's.

wazu 12-07-2012 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9188383)
No

No

No

No

**** NO.

DO NOT WANT.

Indy has always had a shit roster aside from Peyton.
Bills went to four Superbowls in a row under Polian.
Panthers went to NFC Championship their second year under Polian.
Colts went to two Superbowls, winning one under Polian.

The Chiefs could use one of his shit rosters right about now.

wazu 12-07-2012 04:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9188392)
Peyton Manning and Jim Kelly.

Once again, QB means everything. None of these men are geniuses....just their QB's.
Yes, QB means everything. I'd kind of like to have a GM who realizes that and drafts accordingly.

O.city 12-07-2012 04:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9188392)
Peyton Manning and Jim Kelly.

Once again, QB means everything. None of these men are geniuses....just their QB's.
This is basically how you can evaluate every GM.


If he was highly successful, who was his QB?

Although, Polian has done it at multiple stops, so he has a pretty good record with that.

O.city 12-07-2012 04:40 PM
The fact that he apparently knows how important a QB is, is refreshing.

ToxSocks 12-07-2012 04:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wazu (Post 9188398)
Bills went to four Superbowls in a row under Polian.
Panthers went to NFC Championship their second year under Polian.
Colts went to two Superbowls, winning one under Polian.

The Chiefs could use one of his shit rosters right about now.
Jim Kelly & Peyton Manning.

How well did those teams do w/o them?

QB is everything.

If you wanna tell me the man knows how to identify a QB, then maybe you can sell me on that and you may have a case.

But that Indy roster was shit and was carried by Peyton. Everyone knew it and last year proved it.

ToxSocks 12-07-2012 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9188403)
This is basically how you can evaluate every GM.


If he was highly successful, who was his QB?

Although, Polian has done it at multiple stops, so he has a pretty good record with that.
True.

Maybe you guys are right, maybe what Polian CAN do is identify and acquire a franchise QB. After all, that is what is most important. Maybe i can get on board with this.....but then again....he was only able to win one SB with arguably the greatest QB in the history of the game....

O.city 12-07-2012 04:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9188414)
True.

Maybe you guys are right, maybe what Polian CAN do is identify and acquire a franchise QB. After all, that is what is most important. Maybe i can get on board with this.....but then again....he was only able to win one SB with arguably the greatest QB in the history of the game....
Yeah, but he also had to continually play arguably a better QB (playoff wise) damn near every year.


If you take Brady out of the equation, how many do the Colts win?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:08 AM.
Page 9 of 15 « First 5678 9 10111213 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.