ChiefsPlanet
Page 9 of 15 « First 5678 9 10111213 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Joeckel vs. Alberts (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270299)

O.city 02-23-2013 12:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9427561)
Please.



Saying it's not smart doesn't make it not smart. What's not smart about it?
What team has paid a LG LT money? Ever? LG isn't viewed as a high impact position, therefor people don't pay big money for that position. There is a reason (right or wrong) why LT's make that much money.


Why do you think Albert can play LG?

O.city 02-23-2013 12:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9427565)
14. You simply can't resist turning everything back to a QB conversation can you?
And you simply can't resist making stupid ****ing claims like paying a LG LT money.

patteeu 02-23-2013 12:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9427562)
How are we improving the LT position? Albert is a top 10 LT. We don't even know if Joeckel can be a top 32 LT in the NFL.
If Albert is a top 10 LT and Joeckel is a top 5 LT, you've improved your LT position, that's how.

-King- 02-23-2013 12:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9427568)
If Albert is a top 10 LT and Joeckel is a top 5 LT, you've improved your LT position, that's how.
ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL

Ok, you're trolling. Got it.

patteeu 02-23-2013 12:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9427566)
What team has paid a LG LT money? Ever? LG isn't viewed as a high impact position, therefor people don't pay big money for that position. There is a reason (right or wrong) why LT's make that much money.


Why do you think Albert can play LG?
I asked you a question. Do you have an answer that actually addresses it?

O.city 02-23-2013 12:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9427568)
If Albert is a top 10 LT and Joeckel is a top 5 LT, you've improved your LT position, that's how.
Thats true, but in the grand scheme of winning football games, it wouldn't be a huge gap.


We then get into the difference in a top 10 LT and a top 5 LT. Honestly, I feel like the LT spot is a little overvalued at this point in time, but thats a different situation all together.

O.city 02-23-2013 12:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9427572)
I asked you a question. Do you have an answer that actually addresses it?
Actually I did in a previous post.


LG isn't a high impact spot, you can get good play for much cheaper, which allows you to spend said money elsewhere.

-King- 02-23-2013 12:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9427573)
Thats true
:spock::spock: How is it true? Joeckel could end up being just as good as Jason Smith in the league.

O.city 02-23-2013 12:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9427575)
:spock::spock: How is it true? Joeckel could end up being just as good as Jason Smith in the league.
He didn't say Joeckel would be, he said if he was. So technically, it would be improving the positions.

I don't think it's much difference between a top 10 LT and a top 5 LT, in terms of wins and losses though.

-King- 02-23-2013 12:59 AM
We should draft a RB 1st overall and move Charles to Fullback. We'll have improved two positions.

patteeu 02-23-2013 12:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9427566)
What team has paid a LG LT money? Ever? LG isn't viewed as a high impact position, therefor people don't pay big money for that position. There is a reason (right or wrong) why LT's make that much money.


Why do you think Albert can play LG?
BTW, both the Raiders and the Cardinals have done it. I'm sure there are others. Not that that makes any difference in this argument.

-King- 02-23-2013 01:00 AM
We should draft Jarvis Jones first overall and move Justin Houston to DE. We'll have improved two positions that way!

-King- 02-23-2013 01:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9427579)
BTW, both the Raiders and the Cardinals have done it. I'm sure there are others. Not that that makes any difference in this argument.
They have? When?

O.city 02-23-2013 01:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9427579)
BTW, both the Raiders and the Cardinals have done it. I'm sure there are others. Not that that makes any difference in this argument.
Well, IIRC, they did it because their LT wasn't good enough to play LT, so yeah, this is a different situation. We would be doing it because we found a better LT, which IMO, isn't necessary because Albert is very much above average at LT, so that first pick could be used to get a better player elsewhere.

O.city 02-23-2013 01:02 AM
I think he's referring to Gallery and I'm not sure about the Cardinals.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:04 PM.
Page 9 of 15 « First 5678 9 10111213 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.