![]() |
Quote:
We would have traded for a QB, signed a QB, and drafted a QB and there would no longer be any doubt this team values and is attempting to improve the position. I'd hate trading Albert or going Joeckel but if we turned around and used a 2nd rounder on a QB that fell I'd feel completely different. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Just throwing this out there...
If Albert gets moved for a draft pick or two, do we become players to pick up Dumervil? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://media1.break.com/dnet/media/2008/12/79%20WTF.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Let's trade Peter King for a dipshit to be named later please.
|
Quote:
But trading Albert for THAT pathetic offer is not only a ****ing insult, but it shows that he's completely 100% incapable of making deals in the league. Maybe he's a brilliant talent evaluator, but that trade shows that he's a ****ing awful salesman and bargainer, which is the other side of being a great GM-- you can't just be all about talent evaluation. He's well-liked around the NFL. If he lets Albert go for a measly 2nd rounder, perhaps he's TOO well-liked. If he's the coward who always breaks first on every player deal, then he's a terrible GM. Period. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
For whatever reason, the Chiefs front offices have wanted to ship out Albert of possible. Haley rode his ass, made him lose weight and effectively changed his game, which was leverage and strength. I have no idea how Reid plans to scheme his offensive line but clearly, they'll move on if possible. And to say that a rookie LT would be a downgrade is complete speculation. We've seen plenty of first round tackle start day one and be effective, if not play at a Pro Bowl level out of the gate. |
Quote:
"Value" is overrated. Would you rather pay $8.5 million for Albert or $4.9 million for his replacement AND have a high second round pick? It's as much about the cap as it is the player. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.