Originally Posted by ASS11 (Post 12511913)

Slowly, Dane begins his metamorphosis into a homer beatdown artist.

Soon he will be shitting on Reid and Smith left and right! I give it six weeks until he's fully transformed to his old, glorious self.

Originally Posted by Chief Northman (Post 12511948)

Did you buy a new crystal ball? Old one wasn't working?

Originally Posted by ASS11 (Post 12512023)

batting .1000.

Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 12512033)

so, wrong 90% of the time.

Originally Posted by ASS11 (Post 12512037)

:facepalm:

I've picked 5 of the games correctly this year. Please step off.

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 12512039)

Ive picked 6 :) Now listen...

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12509935)

One of the sportswriters I follow on Twitter recently said that the public has become numb to the fact that these guys have their bodies ripped open, have ligaments replaced or repaired and go through months, if not years, of recovery and rehab.

Yet the fans are at the point where they expect their favorite athlete to return quickly and play as if nothing happened. Sadly, this isn't always the case.

As I've mentioned several times, HGH testing has slowed recoveries to nearly a standstill. Charles is more than one year removed from his surgery yet he's clearly not 100% and at age 29, he most likely won't ever be the same player he was before this particular surgery. Fortunately, the Chiefs have players in Ware and West that take the sting out the loss of Charles.

Hopefully, Houston's recovery is without any speed bumps but considering that Phillip Gaines (age 25) is also having difficulty with his surgically repaired knee, it'll be surprising if he's able to step in and have the same kind of impact as he had in 2014 and 2015.

Originally Posted by ASS11 (Post 12512037)

:facepalm:

I've picked 5 of the games correctly this year. Please step off.

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12512058)

I think you are missing the math he was pointing out...

Originally Posted by ASS11 (Post 12512064)

He's trying to be clever. And failing.

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12512072)

He correctly pointed out that you said you were at .1000 correct, which is 10%. I think knowing simple decimals isnt clever as much as it is basic.

You meant to say that besides the one you got wrong, you have been entirely correct. Of course if you always discount things people got wrong, then everybody is always batting 1.000.

Originally Posted by ASS11 (Post 12512075)

Yes, I'm sorry I misplaced a decimal. He really got me, boy!

Originally Posted by R Clark (Post 12512336)

Your such a waste of space

Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 12512376)

You're*