![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm warming up to this guy.
I complained about his separation earlier but I think I may have been wrong on him. Might be the exception. He seems like a legitimate possibility |
Are y’all concerned about burks 3 cone of 7.28? I know he’s a big guy but that’s concerning?
https://www.mockdraftable.com/player/treylon-burks |
Deebo, who’s often comped to, had a 7.03 3 cone at 214 lbs. burks was 225 but 3 inches taller.
https://www.mockdraftable.com/player/deebo-samuel |
No DK Metcalf had a 7.38
|
DK isn’t a gadget player. If you draft burks, you’re hoping for some of those deebo gadget plays, right? Will burks have the quickness at that size to be a gadget player? And Dk is huge and ran a 4.33. Burks ran a 4.55.
|
Quote:
|
6 of the tes at the combine had 7.06 3 cone or quicker.
|
It's a huge concern for me. Others on here say he plays faster than he tests. But the tape on him still looks slow to me. He works in RPO situations though.
https://i.imgur.com/XLRe20g.jpg |
Burks doesn't really fit this offense.
|
Quote:
I've not seen his RAS though so no idea if he's more agile than I'm imagining, or if I've missed his better plays. I don't hate him in R3 but wouldn't want him earlier. |
Quote:
I don't see what you see at all. But who knows? |
Quote:
/duck for cover |
Anyone expecting Burks to be Deebo will be sorely disappointed.
He is nowhere near the threat that Deebo is with the ball in his hands. Watching that clip of Burks take a WR handoff around the corner was cringe. That is not his game. The Deebo comparisons are kind of lazy. They're mostly based off physical appearance IMO. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.