Quote:
Originally Posted by scho63
(Post 17529874)
Why is LiveNation/Ticketmaster the bad guy when people pay $500 for a seat that was bought for $100 and the person who originally bought it makes a ton? That's free market.
The entertainment industry should find a way to help resolve this.
It seems that non-transferable tickets could work with todays technology.
I think it is a slippery slope.
|
Maybe you're finally getting it, I'm pretty sure that's the point of this lawsuit. Ticketmaster hasn't shown any interest in resolving this because they get to double dip. We'll have to see. I'm not sure they'll be broken up but this is obviously a play to get them to take their business more seriously.
What caused this isn't what you described. When Taylor Swift's last tour was announced, they didn't even have a "general" sale to the public. Ticketmaster themselves cancelled the public ticket sale a day or two before they even went on sale because of "extraordinarily" high demand. That's why the Swift fans flipped out and caused all this. The tickets never truly went to general sale. Now I'm sure some fans got tickets in a presale but a lot of those tickets ended up with scalpers and bots, LiveNation got dragged in front of Congress for it and pretty much admitted it was because of bots and scalpers. Taylor Swift herself called Ticketmaster out on it. Now some people think Ticketmaster is in on that game. They sell the tickets to scalpers, make a profit, then charge a second massive ticket fee when that scalper sells the ticket to a Swift fan for $1200. Whether they're in on it or not, they get to double dip basically.
Either way, the argument is their power over the music industry allows them to do whatever they want, strongarm venues and ticket resellers, and they have no incentive to figure out solutions for any issues that come up. That's literally the whole point of this.
|