ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Rick Gosselin draft grade: Chiefs get A+ (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227224)

DaneMcCloud 04-25-2010 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6714566)
But you know exactly what's been missing there: QB. And they've also done a terrible job trying to acquire a legit #1 WR.

Mason is money for a ton of receptions--much appreciated in PPR leagues--but he's not a game changer.

With Boldin and, I believe, an ascending Flacco, Baltimore is going to be a really solid team.

Yes, I do know what's been missing.

But apparently, while they seem to win the draft each year, their QB evaluation has been the only roadblock to the Super Bowl.

Regardless of why they haven't been to the Super Bowl, they haven't been to the Super Bowl.

philfree 04-25-2010 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714602)
Hell, I'll give you an out.

Start a poll asking if I'm one of the more knowledgeable posters on the forum. Or if my takes are respected.

Then you have nothing to do with it, other than leaving when you're proven wrong.

You made the claim, coward. Back it up.

You are a dumfuk/Chiefsplanet


Feel better now?

I D 10 T


PhilFree:arrow:

SenselessChiefsFan 04-25-2010 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6714598)
You know I want to elaborate on this statement you just made.

I had this thought the other day, and said to myself why draft a guy like Arenas in the 2nd round? When a lot of people would say you could have him in the 5th or 6th?

10 years ago I would agree you don't select a returner in the 2nd round because you could easily find those guys in the 5th, 6th or 7th rounds. But I think in todays NFL more teams are emphasizing and focusing on the kick return positon than ever before. With that being said, it forces the teams hands by taking them sooner rather than later because they just don't last to the later rounds anymore.

I understand where OTW is coming from on this. But, these were special talents with good character. The only other guys left were either guys with question marks or average good character kids.

While these may look like luxury picks... they are guys that are special. Not just bodies to fill the roster and guys that make an impact as soon as they get on the field.

I think the Chiefs played the draft perfectly.

DaneMcCloud 04-25-2010 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714570)
You act as if there aren't 31 other teams trying to get to the SB as well.

Dude, I respect you but this comment is way out of bounds. Out of respect to you, I'm not going to address it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714570)
You really want to use SB appearances as a knock on their drafting?

As Joey Porter (or some Miami Dolphin said last summer) about the Jets: "Hey man, they're the offseason Champs!"

It really doesn't matter how well you supposedly draft if the end result, especially after more than a decade of "winning" drafts, you have nothing to show for it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714570)
I'll remember that when we don't make the playoffs, much less the SB under Scott Pioli.

Now that's just your ego showing.

No one is suggesting that the Chiefs are a playoff team in 2011, let alone, 2010.

This team has a long, long way to go before they're consistently competing in the playoffs, regardless of whether or not Pioli's the GM or not.

splatbass 04-25-2010 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 6712294)
No - what's completely unfair is to forget that everyone is entitled to thier own opinion. If it's different from yours, it's not moronic, it's just a difference of opinion.

That goes both ways. The drafturbaters here shout down and insult anyone that dares disagree with them.

Just Passin' By 04-25-2010 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6714583)
The people who have been questioning this teams personnel decisions the last several years are wrong? 10 wins in 3 seasons and those griping are the ones not in touch with reality?

The jackholes who've been bitching about every pick that doesn't suit their agenda to a tee, yes.

Whether they, and apparently you, care to admit it or not, they don't know what the hell they're talking about. All the bitching about offensive linemen not getting drafted by the Chiefs last year should have made that abundantly clear when those same O-linemen accomplished essentially nothing on the field. Instead, those same ass clowns who ignore that lack of production from the offensive linemen rookies go bashing on the Chiefs because the rookies Pioli chose didn't all become Pro Bowlers in their first year.

aturnis 04-25-2010 09:52 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 6713728)
I just don't see it, personally. I mean 67% is way too high to be realistic IMO. Also 'constantly' I guess is subjective...but I see him as more of a situational player. 3rd downs, maybe some second & longs, and as a slot receiver...I just dont see it adding up to a 36th overall this season for this team...

I really hope I am wrong though. (I hope he has enough talent and durability to do more).

This is the percentage of plays per game New England plays Wes Welker. While I don't expect to see McCluster used quite as often. This does show that 50-60% of offensive snaps does make it realistic. Especially beings he seems to be a good blocker for a guy his size.

Hootie 04-25-2010 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714602)
Hell, I'll give you an out.

Start a poll asking if I'm one of the more knowledgeable posters on the forum. Or if my takes are respected.

Then you have nothing to do with it, other than leaving when you're proven wrong.

You made the claim, coward. Back it up.

are you not getting the point?

Seriously...

are you stupid?

IT IS A POPULARITY CONTEST...THAT'S ALL IT WOULD BE...

Is that so tough to understand?

CosmicPal 04-25-2010 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714578)
Does every team in the league NEED a OLB?

He fell approximately 10 spots. Did he fit the needs of any of those teams?

Do any of those teams even play a 34?

Let's put it this way: Had the Chiefs drafted Sergio Kindle in the 2nd round, this board, particularly YOU, Mecca, and Hamas would all be crying foul because Kindle is a serious injury risk- an injury that PALES in comparison to Moecki's minor injuries.

The fact is, had we drafted him you guys would be dissing the pick because you're NEVER, EVER content with anything the front office and coaching staff do. You guys just *****ing whine like a teenage girl with a bad haircut. It's the same shit with you guys every year. It gets ****ing old.

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6714615)
No one is suggesting that the Chiefs are a playoff team in 2011, let alone, 2010.

This team has a long, long way to go before they're consistently competing in the playoffs, regardless of whether or not Pioli's the GM or not.

Funny, I specifically recall you being in the group of people that expected a playoff caliber team by the 3rd year.

That group generally was expecting 4-12, 8-8, then a playoff run.

If you're backing down from that, fine. But make sure you explain why you're doing so.

My guess is because Scott Pioli hasn't done his job to the level he was expected.

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CosmicPal (Post 6714635)
Let's put it this way: Had the Chiefs drafted Sergio Kindle in the 2nd round, this board, particularly YOU, Mecca, and Hamas would all be crying foul because Kindle is a serious injury risk- an injury that PALES in comparison to Moecki's minor injuries.

The fact is, had we drafted him you guys would be dissing the pick because you're NEVER, EVER content with anything the front office and coaching staff do. You guys just *****ing whine like a teenage girl with a bad haircut. It's the same shit with you guys every year. It gets ****ing old.

Is that why I named 8-10 guys worthy of that spot? Kindle being one of them?

I expect this shit from Hootie, but you're better than this.

DaneMcCloud 04-25-2010 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714651)
Funny, I specifically recall you being in the group of people that expected a playoff caliber team by the 3rd year.

That group generally was expecting 4-12, 8-8, then a playoff run.

If you're backing down from that, fine. But make sure you explain why you're doing so.

My guess is because Scott Pioli hasn't done his job to the level he was expected.

No, I explained here, just in case you missed it:

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6712572)
I think I have this whole thing figured out.

I had no idea what Pioli was doing last year. He drafted guys for the 3-4 and brought in 40 players off the street that were mostly familiar with the "system", their way of doing things. I didn't agree with it, but I'm beginning to understand their philosophy.

First and foremost, they're looking for leaders, smart instinctive football players and guys that will be at the core of this team for a decade. Guys that will be willing to take a little less when free agency comes around, just to be part of the "system" that will be in place. I think this draft solidifies this notion.

I also believe that Pioli knows he can't find playmakers in free agency, so he drafted playmakers this year. Berry, McClusters, Arenas and Moeaki all have the potential to be explosive, game changing playmakers. Asamoah could be a 10 year starter, maybe longer. Lewis plays much faster on film than his 40 time indicates because he's got natural football instincts, same with Sheffield.

I think the Chiefs passed on fat**** Cody and broke Kindle (along with a few other defensive players) because they honestly believe that Jackson, Magee, Dorsey, Mays, Belcher and Studebaker make a big leap from year one in their defense to year two. Personally, I don't disagree.

I also think that it will be much easier for them to grab an NT and a few linebackers at cutdown than for them to find a dynamic WR/RB, CB/Returner and a TE in the mold of Dallas Clark.

What's become extremely clear is that Pioli has five full years in which to build this franchise in his image and that he's under no pressure to win now. With that being the case, he's going to build it exactly as he sees fit, regardless of what anyone else thinks or believes.

Only time will tell if he's successful or not, but I for one am in no way, shape or form, disappointed with this draft because he got playmakers and instinctual, productive football players that will help this team for a long time.


OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6714632)
are you not getting the point?

Seriously...

are you stupid?

IT IS A POPULARITY CONTEST...THAT'S ALL IT WOULD BE...

Is that so tough to understand?

So now it's a popularity contest when you have nothing to do with it?

I'm in a popularity contest with myself.

You're ****ing pathetic.

tonyetony 04-25-2010 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714602)
Hell, I'll give you an out.

Start a poll asking if I'm one of the more knowledgeable posters on the forum. Or if my takes are respected.

Then you have nothing to do with it, other than leaving when you're proven wrong.

You made the claim, coward. Back it up.

If you're trying to tie your self worth to the few posters that actually like you on this board you are PATHETIC. I think you've become a better poster the last 6 months but please don't overrate yourself it could be embarrassing for you.

Go ahead and start the poll and if you lose will you actually leave this time?

CosmicPal 04-25-2010 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714655)
Is that why I named 8-10 guys worthy of that spot? Kindle being one of them?

I expect this shit from Hootie, but you're better than this.

My emphasis was on those who were desirous of getting Kindle with the pick.

If you named 8-10 guys in an earlier post, I didn't see it. My apologies.

-King- 04-25-2010 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6714597)
ROFL

Oh, ok.

Damnit!

What a shitty draft we had! Only columnists like our draft...****! If only we hired Mecca/OTWP and Hamas Jenkins to do our drafts for us!

Looking at Hamas' 2009 CP mock draft picks, I have to say that he severely overestimates his draft knowledge.
Posted via Mobile Device

philfree 04-25-2010 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonyetony (Post 6714664)
If you're trying to tie your self worth to the few posters that actually like you on this board you are PATHETIC. I think you've become a better poster the last 6 months but please don't overrate yourself it could be embarrassing for you.

Go ahead and start the poll and if you lose will you actually leave this time?

LOL Ghey is ghey....


PhilFree:arrow:

RedThat 04-25-2010 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6714613)
I understand where OTW is coming from on this. But, these were special talents with good character. The only other guys left were either guys with question marks or average good character kids.

While these may look like luxury picks... they are guys that are special. Not just bodies to fill the roster and guys that make an impact as soon as they get on the field.

I think the Chiefs played the draft perfectly.

Me too. I must admit I like what Scott Pioli is doing.

I think he is focusing towards building a better culture in the locker room and at the same time he is adding players with playmaking ability. Thats impressive right there.

*As far as the luxury picks go, I don't exactly think of those picks as luxury picks mainly because I feel both McCluster and Arenas will provide versatility to this team and will improve this team in more ways than one.

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714659)
So now it's a popularity contest when you have nothing to do with it?

I'm in a popularity contest with myself.

You're ****ing pathetic.

I just think it's funny that you and your buddies get so worked up over this stuff when you are just cherrypicking this shit in the first place...and clearly the people you are cherrypicking it from don't know jackshit...just like you, just like me...

Walter Football...ROFL

whoever runs that site is more pathetic than mecca...and mecca is like 30, has never had a job, and lives at home

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 6714616)
That goes both ways. The drafturbaters here shout down and insult anyone that dares disagree with them.

No, we shout down and insult people that don't ****ing read, and then inaccurately post bullshit about what they "think" we are saying.

I was just accused of seing no value in the Asomoah pick, when I've done nothing but praise the pick all ****ing weekend.

Forgive me if I get pissed off when people sling bullshit - that they KNOW goes against what is posted here in black and white - just to troll.

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 6714671)
Looking at Hamas' 2009 CP mock draft picks, I have to say that he severely overestimates his draft knowledge.
Posted via Mobile Device

linkage?

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6714677)
I just think it's funny that you and your buddies get so worked up over this stuff when you are just cherrypicking this shit in the first place...and clearly the people you are cherrypicking it from don't know jackshit...just like you, just like me...

Walter Football...ROFL

whoever runs that site is more pathetic than mecca...and mecca is like 30, has never had a job, and lives at home

Keep moving those goalposts, coward.

DaneMcCloud 04-25-2010 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6713983)
I'll take that response as you saying that Detroit does have more talent than us, mainly because they don't value leadership over talent.

At this point, they really are only missing a lockdown corner and a true LTOTF. Though it is entirely possible that Fox could become that guy.

My guess is that they'll win 5-6 games this year in a brutal division, and we'll win the same amount in a terrible division and playing a weak schedule.

Dude, please.

You should know me much better by now. If I'm out to make a point, I'll make a point. I bypassed this in favor of answering your other question because it's kind of silly and pointless to compare both rosters, man by man. And in all honesty, I think the Chiefs have better coordinators and more talent on the whole than Detroit, outside of the QB position and the WR position.

The Chiefs could easily win six this year. If the ball rolls their way, they could conceivably win eight. Now, there's virtually no chance they make the playoffs but if their personnel decisions are even 50% correct (TJ, Weignman, Lilja along with the draft), I find it very difficult to argue that this team isn't dramatically improved.

They're not improved enough to challenge for the division title or a playoff spot, but they are improved.

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6714658)
No, I explained here, just in case you missed it:

Yeah, that's what you posted this weekend.

Did you, or did you not expect a playoff run by Year Three when Pioli was hired?

I'll gladly apologize if I'm wrong, but I recall you sharing a similar opinion to Me, Deez, Flopnuts, etc.

philfree 04-25-2010 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714686)
Keep moving those goalposts, coward.

NO...You are a pathetic person if this is where you're taking this.....I've read negative BS about this all day....It's invalid....

PhilFree:arrow:

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-25-2010 10:09 PM

I've posted this list from the 2009 draft multiple times, and Hootie never responds to it:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/image...s/viewpost.gif
Yeah..

Sanchez--Obviously a terrible pick
Beanie Wells--Another awful pick
Cody Brown--Hurt his wrist in PS, spent the year on IR
Coye Francies--Had a Donald Washington-esque year for the Browns.
Jasper Brinkley--Starting for the Vikings
David Bruton--Played the whole year for the Broncos
Cornelius Lewis--That's a bust of a pick, no doubt
Gerald Cadogan--Not a good pick
Mike Goodson--Drafted by Carolina. Spent the year behind Stewart and Williams.
Rhett Bomar--Giants 3rd/4th string QB as a rookie. Developmental player, that's notbad.
DeAngelo-Smith. Backup safety for the Lions
Terrance Knighton--45 tackles and 1.5 sacks as a rookie for the Jags. Was actually drafted in the 3rd round, got him in the 6th.
Josh Mauga--7th round LB. Bounced back and forth on the Jets' PS
Roy Miller--yth round DT who had 27 tackles and 2 sacks as a rookie. Was actually drafted in the 3rd round.
Kenny McKinley--WR drafted in the 5th by the Broncos I got in the 7th. Saw some KR and ST action as a n00b.
Brandon Tate--6th round pick for me, 3rd in reality. It's a pick you take and put him on IR b/c of his knee injury his Sr. Year. It'll pay off down the road.
Thomas Morestead--Punter for the Saints. They took him in the 5th, I got him in the 6th for the Pats.
Cary Harris--last pick for the Pats. He was drafted by the Bills in the 6th round. Had two picks as a rookie.
Don Carey-7th round pick who actually went in the 6th. Plays for the Jags. Developmental player who spent the year on IR.
Camerron Morrah-6th round pick by me who went in the 7th. Played the whole year for the Seahawks, but didn't see much time behind John Carlson.
Bradley Fletcher--6th round player I picked who actually went in the third. Finished with 3 starts and 23 tackles as a rookie
Robert Brewster--7th rounder that I got for the next to last pick in the draft. He was drafted in the 3rd round by Dallas, and projects to be their RTOTF.
Brandon Swain--DII player I took as MR. Irrelevant. Never amounted to anything. So sue me.

So please, tell me how terrible that draft is.




2008:


Gholston--Looking like a monumental bust
Nicks--One of the best young guards in football
Cliff Avril--3rd Round pick, 10.5 sacks and 7 FF in two years
Thomas DeCoud--Starter for the Falcons. 68 Tackles, 3 picks, 2 sacks, 2 FF last year
Matt Forte--Should have been the OROY. 4th round pick
Jonathan Goff-- Took over as starting MLB for the Giants last year
Tyvon Branch--2 year starter for the Raiders. 124 tackles last year as a safety


Those were my picks in the first four Rounds of the 2008 draft. Every one hit but Gholston.

So please, tell me I don't know anything about projecting players.


Hootie 04-25-2010 10:12 PM

Hamas embarrasses himself every year in that mock draft...

every year...

I think it's so funny that those guys watch one or two college football games per week, dodge this point every time, and then claim they know something based off of what they've seen...and won't admit they simply cherrypick the information from scouting services found on the internet and then decide what they want to roll with, and what they don't want to roll with based off of whether they like the guy with the information or not.

I'd be willing to bet Hamas didn't watch Bruce Campbell play more than two times...and that's being generous...

as he was bashing Charlie Casserly for saying Campbell looked bad on tape...acting like Casserly (the ballsy GM who took Mario Williams over Reggie Bush and was with Washington when they raped New Orleans in that Ricky Williams deal) doesn't know anything...

the dude took a late round OT before Anthony freaking Davis...

he passed on Bradford for a guy that ended up going 48th overall...at #1...

he took Vernon Gholston #1 overall because of his combine numbers...

that dude just needs to shut the **** up and start doing damage control...

Actually I'll go on...

He told me Peyton Manning's 1st half INT in the 2006 AFC Championship game (a game the Colts ended up winning) was more devastating to his team that game then Tom Brady's season ending INT in that same game, in Colts territory, where a TD sends the Pats to the Super Bowl. This is something he said...

He also said Brett Favre COULDN'T POSSIBLY be the best player on the Vikings because Peyton Manning is a better QB than Brett Favre and Brett Favre plays on the same team as Kevin Williams.

I know, right?

DaneMcCloud 04-25-2010 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714694)
Yeah, that's what you posted this weekend.

Did you, or did you not expect a playoff run by Year Three when Pioli was hired?

I'll gladly apologize if I'm wrong, but I recall you sharing a similar opinion to Me, Deez, Flopnuts, etc.

In year one, yes, absolutely. I incorrectly assumed that Scott Pioli would come in and pick up right where Carl & Kuharich left off.

I was wrong and have voiced my concerns ad nauseam on this forum for the better part of 14 months.

So in short, I do not believe that by year three, they'll be a consistent playoff team. It would be awesome IF it happens but at this point in time, I think it's going to be difficult.

I would love, however, to be wrong.

Titty Meat 04-25-2010 10:13 PM

My boy Phillip Dillard will be replacing Goff at ILB.

Hammock Parties 04-25-2010 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6714698)
I've posted this list from the 2009 draft multiple times, and Hootie never responds to it:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/image...s/viewpost.gif
Yeah..

Sanchez--Obviously a terrible pick
Beanie Wells--Another awful pick
Cody Brown--Hurt his wrist in PS, spent the year on IR
Coye Francies--Had a Donald Washington-esque year for the Browns.
Jasper Brinkley--Starting for the Vikings
David Bruton--Played the whole year for the Broncos
Cornelius Lewis--That's a bust of a pick, no doubt
Gerald Cadogan--Not a good pick
Mike Goodson--Drafted by Carolina. Spent the year behind Stewart and Williams.
Rhett Bomar--Giants 3rd/4th string QB as a rookie. Developmental player, that's notbad.
DeAngelo-Smith. Backup safety for the Lions
Terrance Knighton--45 tackles and 1.5 sacks as a rookie for the Jags. Was actually drafted in the 3rd round, got him in the 6th.
Josh Mauga--7th round LB. Bounced back and forth on the Jets' PS
Roy Miller--yth round DT who had 27 tackles and 2 sacks as a rookie. Was actually drafted in the 3rd round.
Kenny McKinley--WR drafted in the 5th by the Broncos I got in the 7th. Saw some KR and ST action as a n00b.
Brandon Tate--6th round pick for me, 3rd in reality. It's a pick you take and put him on IR b/c of his knee injury his Sr. Year. It'll pay off down the road.
Thomas Morestead--Punter for the Saints. They took him in the 5th, I got him in the 6th for the Pats.
Cary Harris--last pick for the Pats. He was drafted by the Bills in the 6th round. Had two picks as a rookie.
Don Carey-7th round pick who actually went in the 6th. Plays for the Jags. Developmental player who spent the year on IR.
Camerron Morrah-6th round pick by me who went in the 7th. Played the whole year for the Seahawks, but didn't see much time behind John Carlson.
Bradley Fletcher--6th round player I picked who actually went in the third. Finished with 3 starts and 23 tackles as a rookie
Robert Brewster--7th rounder that I got for the next to last pick in the draft. He was drafted in the 3rd round by Dallas, and projects to be their RTOTF.
Brandon Swain--DII player I took as MR. Irrelevant. Never amounted to anything. So sue me.

So please, tell me how terrible that draft is.




2008:


Gholston--Looking like a monumental bust
Nicks--One of the best young guards in football
Cliff Avril--3rd Round pick, 10.5 sacks and 7 FF in two years
Thomas DeCoud--Starter for the Falcons. 68 Tackles, 3 picks, 2 sacks, 2 FF last year
Matt Forte--Should have been the OROY. 4th round pick
Jonathan Goff-- Took over as starting MLB for the Giants last year
Tyvon Branch--2 year starter for the Raiders. 124 tackles last year as a safety


Those were my picks in the first four Rounds of the 2008 draft. Every one hit but Gholston.

So please, tell me I don't know anything about projecting players.


http://i.imgur.com/OGASr.png

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6714687)
Dude, please.

You should know me much better by now. If I'm out to make a point, I'll make a point. I bypassed this in favor of answering your other question because it's kind of silly and pointless to compare both rosters, man by man. And in all honesty, I think the Chiefs have better coordinators and more talent on the whole than Detroit, outside of the QB position and the WR position.

The Chiefs could easily win six this year. If the ball rolls their way, they could conceivably win eight. Now, there's virtually no chance they make the playoffs but if their personnel decisions are even 50% correct (TJ, Weignman, Lilja along with the draft), I find it very difficult to argue that this team isn't dramatically improved.

They're not improved enough to challenge for the division title or a playoff spot, but they are improved.

Why is it silly to compare, Dane?

Some of us were championing Schwartz as the new HC of the Chiefs.

He was hired at the same time as Pioli/Haley.

Why is it silly to compare two teams that started over, both with next to nothing on their roster?

I know that if I were trying to make the point that KC has done a better job over the past 15 months, I wouldn't want to compare the rosters either.

This isn't a knock on you personally. You're my boy. But the overall tone of this place is EXACTLY like last year.

Everyone hates the picks initially, (sans Berry and Asomoah) then begin to rationalize it because some pundits like it - instead of sticking to their opinion.

It happened after the Cassel trade, it happened after last year's draft, and it happened this weekend.

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714684)
No, we shout down and insult people that don't ****ing read, and then inaccurately post bullshit about what they "think" we are saying.

I was just accused of seing no value in the Asomoah pick, when I've done nothing but praise the pick all ****ing weekend.

Forgive me if I get pissed off when people sling bullshit - that they KNOW goes against what is posted here in black and white - just to troll.

no one accused you of that ROFLROFLROFL

you were blasting the McCluster and Arenas picks citing Gosselin's top 100...and conveniently ignoring the fact Moeaki was #48 and Asomoah was like #54...

You cited a guy who gave us an A+ to prove your point on why our draft sucked.

In other words...

your and idiot

RedThat 04-25-2010 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6714687)
Dude, please.

You should know me much better by now. If I'm out to make a point, I'll make a point. I bypassed this in favor of answering your other question because it's kind of silly and pointless to compare both rosters, man by man. And in all honesty, I think the Chiefs have better coordinators and more talent on the whole than Detroit, outside of the QB position and the WR position.

The Chiefs could easily win six this year. If the ball rolls their way, they could conceivably win eight. Now, there's virtually no chance they make the playoffs but if their personnel decisions are even 50% correct (TJ, Weignman, Lilja along with the draft), I find it very difficult to argue that this team isn't dramatically improved.

They're not improved enough to challenge for the division title or a playoff spot, but they are improved.

Yup. I agree.

I even think last year as bad as this team was last year, they could've won 6 or 7 games. Only reason I say that, they blew 2 or 3 they should of won. And, if you think about it, lets say Charles started the whole season alone from game 1, I think just having him alone would of helped us win a couple of more games.

LJ sucked so bad, and he was clearly a big reason why this team and offense was atrocious from the start. As soon as the Chiefs released him and Charles started, they were a bit of a different team.

*I think they could win 7 this year. You're right not improved enough to challenge for a playoff spot. I think they will though once they improve the defense.

-King- 04-25-2010 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6714685)
linkage?

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=203486
Posted via Mobile Device

Mr. Flopnuts 04-25-2010 10:16 PM

One of these days I'm going to have to look through the mocks to see how I've done picking players. I've honestly never bothered.

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6714696)
NO...You are a pathetic person if this is where you're taking this.....I've read negative BS about this all day....It's invalid....

PhilFree:arrow:

I'm pathetic Phil?

The coward claims I know nothing about football.

I simply asked him to poll the people. If I'm the football idiot he says I am, it shouldn't be an issue.

You understand the concept of standing behind your claims, don't you Phil?

You wouldn't make false accusations, just to troll the board, and then hide behind your keyboard when called on it, would you?

I don't think you would, Phil, because you appear to have some integrity.

I'm just asking him to be a man, and stand behind his comment.

Mr. Flopnuts 04-25-2010 10:17 PM

And in today's NFL it doesn't matter how devoid your roster is of talent. It's not a 5 year process anymore. It's from 1-3 tops in my humble opinion.

That said, I'm still firmly on the 8-8 or GTFO band wagon.

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6714717)

2009 is not good...especially since you took Sanchez when the team already spent a high 2nd on Cassel...****ing moron of a pick...

Beanie Wells is a good, yet obvious pick. When you take a RB early, he better be good.

Other than that...I see NOTHING that makes me think, "wow, I'd sure love to have that player on KC!"

and 2008...

you took Vernon Gholston #1 overall.

...

Matt Forte is a dime a dozen back...

Uh...

Avril and Nicks...good picks. Congrats.

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6714713)
In year one, yes, absolutely. I incorrectly assumed that Scott Pioli would come in and pick up right where Carl & Kuharich left off.

I was wrong and have voiced my concerns ad nauseam on this forum for the better part of 14 months.

So in short, I do not believe that by year three, they'll be a consistent playoff team. It would be awesome IF it happens but at this point in time, I think it's going to be difficult.

I would love, however, to be wrong.

Thank you for your honesty.

KCwolf 04-25-2010 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714719)
Why is it silly to compare, Dane?

Some of us were championing Schwartz as the new HC of the Chiefs.

He was hired at the same time as Pioli/Haley.

Why is it silly to compare two teams that started over, both with next to nothing on their roster?

I know that if I were trying to make the point that KC has done a better job over the past 15 months, I wouldn't want to compare the rosters either.

This isn't a knock on you personally. You're my boy. But the overall tone of this place is EXACTLY like last year.

Everyone hates the picks initially, (sans Berry and Asomoah) then begin to rationalize it because some pundits like it - instead of sticking to their opinion.

It happened after the Cassel trade, it happened after last year's draft, and it happened this weekend.

Very Very Few were happy about last years Draft........

splatbass 04-25-2010 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714694)
Did you, or did you not expect a playoff run by Year Three when Pioli was hired?

You realize this is year two, right?

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714729)
I'm pathetic Phil?

The coward claims I know nothing about football.

I simply asked him to poll the people. If I'm the football idiot he says I am, it shouldn't be an issue.

You understand the concept of standing behind your claims, don't you Phil?

You wouldn't make false accusations, just to troll the board, and then hide behind your keyboard when called on it, would you?

I don't think you would, Phil, because you appear to have some integrity.

I'm just asking him to be a man, and stand behind his comment.

You're missing the point...

I don't give a shit what anyone else thinks...

I form my own opinions based off of what I believe...

I don't care what GoChiefs, or Dane, or Flopnuts, or Knowmo, or Vailpass, or Frazod, OR ANYONE thinks...if I agree with them it's because I honestly agree with them...

I honestly think you're a want-to-be know-it-all who ends up knowing far less than he really knows and you keep proving it and proving it and proving it.

Every time you click "Submit Reply"...

Titty Meat 04-25-2010 10:20 PM

OTW you are comparing apples to oranges my friend. This time last year the team didn't sign a guy like Chambers or Jones. Didn't draft anyone nearly as good as Berry or an impact player like McCluster. I'll even say there was no player this time last year that was good of a pick as Asmogah sp?

RedThat 04-25-2010 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6714730)
And in today's NFL it doesn't matter how devoid your roster is of talent. It's not a 5 year process anymore. It's from 1-3 tops in my humble opinion.

That said, I'm still firmly on the 8-8 or GTFO band wagon.

I think it depends what kind of shape your roster is in once a new regime takes over.

3 years is a solid amount of time to build a team imo. Provided that a lot of things go your way. But it could take longer sometimes. It all depends Flop.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-25-2010 10:21 PM

The rest of my picks from '08

Jalen Parmele: Took over KR duty for the Ravens last year and averaged 31 yards per return (7th rounder)
Kerry Brown: Busted Out (5th)
Lance Leggett: Never Stuck (7th)
King Dunlap: Philly's back up LT (6th)
Kellen Davis: Red zone threat for the Bears caught 3 TDs last year. (6th)
Brian Johnston: We all remember him (6th)

That was the rest of my '08

philfree 04-25-2010 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714729)
I'm pathetic Phil?

The coward claims I know nothing about football.

I simply asked him to poll the people. If I'm the football idiot he says I am, it shouldn't be an issue.

You understand the concept of standing behind your claims, don't you Phil?

You wouldn't make false accusations, just to troll the board, and then hide behind your keyboard when called on it, would you?

I don't think you would, Phil, because you appear to have some integrity.

I'm just asking him to be a man, and stand behind his comment.

You are out of touch if you want a poll to secure your ? Planethood? Grow up man. You have devalued yourself....Why?

PhilFree:arrow:

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6714720)
no one accused you of that ROFLROFLROFL

you were blasting the McCluster and Arenas picks citing Gosselin's top 100...and conveniently ignoring the fact Moeaki was #48 and Asomoah was like #54...

You cited a guy who gave us an A+ to prove your point on why our draft sucked.

In other words...

your and idiot

I didn't ignore anything, you coward. There you go, yet again.

I've done nothing but PRAISE the Asomoah pick the entire ****ing weekend.

How exactly am I ignoring his value?

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:22 PM

Hamas...

whoever you cherrypick your information from drafts almost as good as Carl Peterson...nice job!

DeezNutz 04-25-2010 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6714741)
I'll even say there was no player this time last year that was good of a pick as Asmogah sp?

True.

I'm sorry, but the specter of a dog shit QB looms large over this franchise, and I admit that it clouds my perception and potential optimism.

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714747)
I didn't ignore anything, you coward. There you go, yet again.

I've done nothing but PRAISE the Asomoah pick the entire ****ing weekend.

How exactly am I ignoring his value?

If we took Asomoah at 36, how would you have felt?

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6714745)
You are out of touch if you want a poll to secure your ? Planethood? Grow up man. You have devalued yourself....Why?

PhilFree:arrow:

I don't need anyone to secure anything, Phil I'm not the one hiding behind the keyboard. I attend Planet functions, go on road trips with Planeteers, etc. I'm not hiding - I'm right here in the open.

What I would like, however, is the coward to stand behind his statement.

Shit like this has gone unchecked for too ****ing long.

Put up, or shut up.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-25-2010 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6714731)
2009 is not good...especially since you took Sanchez when the team already spent a high 2nd on Cassel...****ing moron of a pick...

Beanie Wells is a good, yet obvious pick. When you take a RB early, he better be good.

Other than that...I see NOTHING that makes me think, "wow, I'd sure love to have that player on KC!"

and 2008...

you took Vernon Gholston #1 overall.

...

Matt Forte is a dime a dozen back...

Uh...

Avril and Nicks...good picks. Congrats.

Forte had almost 2000 yards from scrimmage as a rookie
Branch would have led our team in tackles last year
Goff is a starter on a really good front seven

From 2009, Sanchez is going to be a franchise QB

Beanie Wells went to Tampa who other people didn't think needed a RB. He wasn't an obvious pick

I had no second rounders and yet got 3 players in the 6th round or later who were picked in the third, including Terrance Knighton, who was an all-rookie performer.

That's not to mention guys like Brinkley or Harris, who would be perfect fits for this defense, or Thomas Morestead, who ruined the Super Bowl for your beloved Peyton.

Just Passin' By 04-25-2010 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6714730)
And in today's NFL it doesn't matter how devoid your roster is of talent. It's not a 5 year process anymore. It's from 1-3 tops in my humble opinion.

That said, I'm still firmly on the 8-8 or GTFO band wagon.

I posted this in another thread, and it's not aimed at you (save to show you the number part) so please don't take any offense where none is intended, but your 1-3 year notion is out of touch with the reality of the NFL:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...18#post6712918

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6714753)
If we took Asomoah at 36, how would you have felt?

Moving the goalposts AGAIN?

We didn't. What's the point?

Mr. Flopnuts 04-25-2010 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6714742)
I think it depends what kind of shape your roster is in once a new regime takes over.

3 years is a solid amount of time to build a team imo. Provided that a lot of things go your way. But it could take longer sometimes. It all depends Flop.

The only way it takes longer in my opinion is if your new GM decides to come in and completely ignore what little strengths the team has and scraps the whole thing and starts over.

I guess this fan base has decided since it hasn't won a Super Bowl in 40 years, 5 more to making the playoffs is no big deal. That's not good enough for me. Not that my opinion means shit anyways.

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:25 PM

I think Sanchez is going to end up being a bust...didn't see anything I liked from him last year...that team did everything they could to protect the fact they had no confidence in that guy throwing passes...

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonyetony (Post 6714664)
If you're trying to tie your self worth to the few posters that actually like you on this board you are PATHETIC. I think you've become a better poster the last 6 months but please don't overrate yourself it could be embarrassing for you.

Go ahead and start the poll and if you lose will you actually leave this time?

Embarrassing for me?

Who are you, again?

DaneMcCloud 04-25-2010 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714719)
Why is it silly to compare, Dane?

Some of us were championing Schwartz as the new HC of the Chiefs.

He was hired at the same time as Pioli/Haley.

Why is it silly to compare two teams that started over, both with next to nothing on their roster?

It's silly to compare because the Lions have, for the most part, been at the bottom of the NFL for nearly a decade. They should have much more talent on their roster than the Chiefs, just due to draft position alone.

I would really like to avoid getting into a position by position analysis in this particular thread, but I'd take Albert over Backus, Waters/Asamoah over Barry Sims, and the turd I just cut over Gosder Cherilus.

I think Delmas is a player but I'll take Berry every time. They play a 4-3, we play a 3-4 so the LB position is different, I'd take our running backs, CB's, etc.

I think the Chiefs will be further along in the "process" (****, I hate the word) than the Lions in 2010 and 2011.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714719)
But the overall tone of this place is EXACTLY like last year.

Everyone hates the picks initially, (sans Berry and Asomoah) then begin to rationalize it because some pundits like it - instead of sticking to their opinion.

It happened after the Cassel trade, it happened after last year's draft, and it happened this weekend.

See, here's the thing: I only worry about me.

I form my opinions based on information I've gathered, whether it's from this site, SI, PFT, Playboy or Tube8.com.

It's ALL me.

Secondly, I put my ass so far out on the line each year that if I'm wrong, people either take shots at me, relinquish the fact that I'm right, or I have to fess up. Either way, I'm good.

I'm not trying to change anyone's perception when I post and I'm not trying to gain popularity.

This is the ONE place I can come and talk about the Chiefs freely, regardless of whether I'm right, wrong or indifferent because I'm basically on an island in SoCal. No one gives a shit about the Chiefs. It would be like if you were a die hard Dodgers fan living in St. Louis. Who would give a ****?

Chiefsplanet will alway be comprised by a majority of fans that see no wrong with what their hometown does because it's their hometown team.

I'm just a dude with an outsider's perspective.

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714762)
Moving the goalposts AGAIN?

We didn't. What's the point?

our first four picks were amazingly good picks...

that's been my point for three days now

Mr. Flopnuts 04-25-2010 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6714760)
I posted this in another thread, and it's not aimed at you (save to show you the number part) so please don't take any offense where none is intended, but your 1-3 year notion is out of touch with the reality of the NFL:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...18#post6712918

Hey, shut me down and I'll give you credit. I only get offended at cheap shots because I don't take them. In other words, we're good. :thumb:

And I understand the Super Bowl argument. But I'm saying that a team should be competing in the playoffs by the 3rd year, not making the Super Bowl. I didn't clarify that, and I should have. 5 years for a title is fine. But I don't expect a team to make the playoffs for the first time in a rebuild and win the Super Bowl in the same year. That's a tough thing to do.

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6714760)
I posted this in another thread, and it's not aimed at you (save to show you the number part) so please don't take any offense where none is intended, but your 1-3 year notion is out of touch with the reality of the NFL:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...18#post6712918

Excellent defense.

Link a post in which you were thoroughly owned, and backed away with your tail between your legs. It doesn't take 5 years to build a playoff team from scratch. And it should take even less when the Executive of the Decade is the one pulling the strings.

philfree 04-25-2010 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714758)
I don't need anyone to secure anything, Phil I'm not the one hiding behind the keyboard. I attend Planet functions, go on road trips with Planeteers, etc. I'm not hiding - I'm right here in the open.

What I would like, however, is the coward to stand behind his statement.

Shit like this has gone unchecked for too ****ing long.

Put up, or shut up.

I hope you had a life before you ever logged into the planet. This a great place if it's self defining for you then.....I'm sorry.


PhilFree:arrow:

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-25-2010 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6714766)
I think Sanchez is going to end up being a bust...didn't see anything I liked from him last year...that team did everything they could to protect the fact they had no confidence in that guy throwing passes...

God knows there was nothing to like from him in the playoffs.

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:28 PM

how tall is OTWP in real life?

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6714777)
God knows there was nothing to like from him in the playoffs.

watched all three games...

he had a good game against Cincy...although it was basically all from the play-action pass and the fact they had the #1 rush offense in the NFL...

The Colts game...

They had them.

HAD THEM

but they wouldn't take the diapers off of Sanchez and they played to not let Sanchez **** up rather than take a shot at going to the Super Bowl.

DaneMcCloud 04-25-2010 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714735)
Thank you for your honesty.

You're welcome.

:D

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6714770)
our first four picks were amazingly good picks...

that's been my point for three days now

In YOUR opinion.

You think Tony Romo is a HOF QB. Sorry if I don't genuflect at your alter.

In MY opinion, two of our picks were amazingly good, one got us a playmaker even though there were playmakers available at positions of greater need, and one got us a KR that people are trying to convince me will be a decent NCB.

Guess we'll find out in a few years.

Titty Meat 04-25-2010 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6714741)
OTW you are comparing apples to oranges my friend. This time last year the team didn't sign a guy like Chambers or Jones. Didn't draft anyone nearly as good as Berry or an impact player like McCluster. I'll even say there was no player this time last year that was good of a pick as Asmogah sp?

OTW?

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6714774)
I hope you had a life before you ever logged into the planet. This a great place if it's self defining for you then.....I'm sorry.


PhilFree:arrow:

Can you read, Phil?

This isn't about self definition. I know exactly where I stand among the people I know and have allowed into my personal life.

This is about being slandered, and expecting people to stand by their statements.

I don't understand why this is so hard to understand.

DaneMcCloud 04-25-2010 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714789)


Guess we'll find out in a few years.

Hey, and let's be clear about one thing: None of us really know the outcome of this draft.

While I'm happy today, 4/25/2010, it's possible that I'm as wrong as Tony "I just came in my sister again" Washington on 4/25/2013.

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:35 PM

I think Tony Romo is a HOF caliber QB...we'll see how it plays out...

Hamas said Tony Romo was among the worst QB's in the NFL.

...

you guys...

I know why I get to you so easily...it's because I'm always so much righter than you...

Whether it's Romo, or Palmer, or Manning, or Brady...

Sorry bra!

tonyetony 04-25-2010 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714767)
Embarrassing for me?

Who are you, again?

I'm a dude that watched you get banned and not take it, I'm also a dude that watched you make a total fool of yourself for the first 3 years you posted.

I lost my post count for some reason but don't really care why, because unlike you I actually have a life.

RedThat 04-25-2010 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6714763)
The only way it takes longer in my opinion is if your new GM decides to come in and completely ignore what little strengths the team has and scraps the whole thing and starts over.

I guess this fan base has decided since it hasn't won a Super Bowl in 40 years, 5 more is no big deal. That's not good enough for me. Not that my opinion means shit anyways.

True. I agree with that.

Also, I think the GM has to be a really good gun slinger. I think the GM needs to score a lot. Missing is no good. I think its pure hit and miss.

If you're a bad team drafting in the top 5 two years in a row and you miss on those picks you are in deep trouble because it's those picks that are the differential makers that either set your team back or make your team go forward.

Im part of that fanbase where I've been patient but just willing to hang in there from time to time. If it takes them 3 years great, if it takes them 5, Im cool with that too. As a fan, the most important thing Im always keeping in mind, is, progress. As long as my team is making strides thats what counts. Sometimes it takes long, sometimes it doesn't. But it's the patience that plays an integral role in that sense. The frustration kicks in when I see my team regressing....Herman *cough* Edwards *cough*

Just Passin' By 04-25-2010 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6714771)
Hey, shut me down and I'll give you credit. I only get offended at cheap shots because I don't take them. In other words, we're good. :thumb:

And I understand the Super Bowl argument. But I'm saying that a team should be competing in the playoffs by the 3rd year, not making the Super Bowl. I didn't clarify that, and I should have. 5 years for a title is fine. But I don't expect a team to make the playoffs for the first time in a rebuild and win the Super Bowl in the same year. That's a tough thing to do.

But again, go back and look at how few teams achieve the goal that you think is a "should". It almost never happens. When a team gets down to 1-3 wins, it's usually because they really, really suck and have little to no talent. Making it even more difficult, free agency doesn't produce the number of quality players it used to, because the huge jump in the salary cap made cap casualties essentially a thing of the past. Hell, it was even worse this year, with the CBA language limiting free agency even more than usual.

If I were a Chiefs fan, I'd be looking for improvement this season, and not looking for hard win totals of any kind until next season. After all, your notion of the playoffs means that the Chiefs will have to get past some number of the following:

Chargers
Broncos
Patriots
Jets
Ravens
Steelers
Bengals

in order to get there. Out of those teams, do you really see any way that the Chiefs will so quickly overtake the talent on any of those rosters other than the Bengals, who were probably a fluke destined to miss the playoffs this year before Roethlisberger went clubbing?

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:36 PM

the Bengals are probably a 5 win team...

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:37 PM

Steelers don't scare me, Jets are overrated...

I like the Texans next year...

Lets see...

Chargers
Patriots
Colts
Ravens
Texans
Titans

Those are my playoff teams.

OnTheWarpath15 04-25-2010 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonyetony (Post 6714799)
I'm a dude that watched you get banned and not take it, I'm also a dude that watched you make a total fool of yourself for the first 3 years you posted.

I lost my post count for some reason but don't really care why, because unlike you I actually have a life.

Excuse me?

I've never been banned in my 5 years here. Nor have I not honored a bet.

What is it with people making shit up this evening?

philfree 04-25-2010 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714795)
Can you read, Phil?

This isn't about self definition. I know exactly where I stand among the people I know and have allowed into my personal life.

This is about being slandered, and expecting people to stand by their statements.

I don't understand why this is so hard to understand.

I guess I missed the slandering......I read you slandering but besides that I'm at a loss.

PhilFree:arrow:

Hootie 04-25-2010 10:38 PM

the Colts are going to have a tough, tough schedule...

I'm thinking next year could actually be the Chargers year to represent the AFC in the Super Bowl.

Just Passin' By 04-25-2010 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6714772)
Excellent defense.

Link a post in which you were thoroughly owned, and backed away with your tail between your legs. It doesn't take 5 years to build a playoff team from scratch. And it should take even less when the Executive of the Decade is the one pulling the strings.

You may be the stupidest person on this site. I wasn't owned, because I was correct. I didn't back away, either. I waited for some time before leaving the site, but I had things to do and couldn't wait all day for Deez to try spinning his boneheaded comment yet another time.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.